journal article·2013-08

Fracture behavior of carbon nanotube/carbon microfiber hybrid polymer composites

Noa Lachman, Hui Qian, Matthieu Houllé, Julien Amadou, Milo S. P. Shaffer, H. Daniel Wagner

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Growing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on the surface of fibers has the potential to modify fiber–matrix interfacial adhesion, enhance composite delamination resistance, and possibly improve toughness. In the present study, aligned CNTs were grown upon carbon fabric via chemical vapor deposition. Continuously monitored single-fiber composite fragmentation tests were performed on pristine and CNT-grafted fibers embedded in epoxy, and single-laminate compact-tension specimens were tested for fracture behavior. A significant increase (up to 20 %) was observed in the interfacial adhesion, at the cost of a decrease in the fiber tensile strength. As a result, the maximum load of the composite was decreased, but its residual load-bearing capacity more than doubled. The likely sources of these effects are discussed, as well as their implications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Nanotechnology research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Launey ME, Ritchie RO (2009) Adv Mater 21:210310.1002/adma.200803322 ↗
2. Bekyarova E, Thostenson ET, Yu A, Kim H, Gao J, Tang J, Hahn HT, Chou T-W, Itkis ME, Haddon RC (2007) Langmuir 23:397010.1021/la062743p ↗
3. Veedu VP, Cao A, Li X, Ma K, Soldano C, Kar S, Ajayan PM (2006) Nat Mater 5:45710.1038/nmat1650 ↗
4. Qian H, Greenhalgh ES, Shaffer MSP, Bismarck A (2010) J Mater Chem 20:475110.1039/c000041h ↗
5. Guzmán de Villoria R, Hart AJ, Wardle BL (2011) ACS Nano 5:485010.1021/nn2008645 ↗
6. Ray MC, Guzmán de Villoria R, Wardle BL (2009) J Adv Mater 41:82
7. Garcia EJ, Wardle BL, Hart AJ, Yamamoto N (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68:203410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.028 ↗
8. Lachman N, Carey BJ, Hashim DP, Ajayan PM, Wagner HD (2012) Compos Sci Technol 72:171110.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.004 ↗
9. Sager RJ, Klein PJ, Lagoudas DC, Zhang Q, Liu J, Dai L, Baur JW (2009) Compos Sci Technol 69:89810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.021 ↗
10. Qian H, Bismarck A, Greenhalgh ES, Shaffer MSP (2010) Compos Sci Technol 70:39310.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.014 ↗
11. Qian H, Bismarck A, Greenhalgh ES, Shaffer MSP (2010) Compos A 41:110710.1016/j.compositesa.2010.04.004 ↗
12. Qian H, Bismarck A, Greenhalgh ES, Kalinka G, Shaffer MSP (2008) Chem Mater 20:186210.1021/cm702782j ↗
13. Kepple KL, Sanborn GP, Lacasse PA, Gruenberg KM, Ready WJ (2008) Carbon 46:202610.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.010 ↗
14. ASTM Standard D6671/D6671M–06 (2006) Standard test method for mixed mode I-mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/D6671-06
15. Wagner HD, Eitan A (1990) Appl Phys Lett 56:196510.1063/1.103012 ↗
16. Yavin B, Gallis HE, Scherf J, Eitan A, Wagner HD (1991) Polym Compos 12:43610.1002/pc.750120609 ↗
17. Lachman N, Wagner HD (2010) Compos A 41:109310.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.023 ↗
18. Mathur RB, Chatterjee S, Singh BP (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68:160810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.020 ↗
19. Gati A, Wagner HD (1997) Macromolecules 30:393310.1021/ma961027z ↗
20. Zhang F, Wang R, He X, Wang C, Ren L (2009) J Mater Sci 44:3574. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3484-x10.1007/s10853-009-3484-x ↗
21. Lachman N, Wiesel E, Guzman de Villoria R, Wardle BL, Wagner HD (2012) Compos Sci Technol 72:141610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.015 ↗
22. Atkins AG (1975) J Mater Sci 10:819. doi: 10.1007/BF0116307710.1007/BF01163077 ↗