RETRACTED ARTICLE: MD simulations on the melting and compression of C, SiC and Si nanotubes
This record is marked as retracted by the source. Review the publisher’s notice before using its findings.
Source abstract
Abstract
By the Tersoff potential based molecular dynamics (MD) method, the melting and axial compression of the (5,5) C, SiC, and Si nanotubes are simulated, and their molecular configurations, atomic radial distribution functions (RDF) and energy changes during heating-up, as well as their compressive force–strain curves, are obtained. According to the computed results, the differences of the melting and compressive mechanical properties of the three nanotubes are discussed. It is found that the melting C, SiC, and Si nanotubes have netlike, loose spherical and compact spherical configurations respectively, and that the C nanotube has the highest melting point, specific heat, melting heat and load support capability, whereas the Si nanotube has the lowest ones.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Iijima SH (1991) Nature 354(6348):5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. Dai HJ, Hafner JH, Rinzler AG, Colbert DT, Smalley RE (1996) Nature 384(6605):14710.1038/384147a0 ↗
3. Shen H, Mu X (2005) J Mater Sci Eng 23(3):321
4. Dmitrii FP, Federico R (2006) Small 2(1):2210.1002/smll.200500276 ↗
5. Seifert G, Köhler Th, Urbassek HM, Hernández E, Frauenheim Th (2001) Phys Rev B 63:19340910.1103/PhysRevB.63.193409 ↗
6. Tang YH, Pei LZ, Chen YW, Guo C (2005) Phys Rev Lett 95:11610210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.116102 ↗
7. Durgun E, Tongay S, Ciraci S (2005) Phys Rev B 72:7542010.1103/PhysRevB.72.075420 ↗
8. Durgun E, Tongay S, Ciraci S (2005) Turk J Phys 29:307
9. Jaeil B, Zeng XC, Hideki T, Zeng JY (2004) Chemistry 101(9):2664
10. Shen H (2004) Comput Appl Chem 21(3):485
11. Young-Kyun K, Savas B, David T (2004) Phys Rev Lett 92:1590110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.015901 ↗
12. Yeau-Ren J, Ping-Chi T (2005) J Chem Phys 122:22471310.1063/1.1924694 ↗
13. Madhu M, Ernst R (2004) Phys Rev B 69:11532210.1103/PhysRevB.69.115322 ↗
14. Fletcher R, Reeves C (1964) Comput J 7:14910.1093/comjnl/7.2.149 ↗
15. Tersoff J (1998) Phys Rev Lett 56(6):63210.1103/PhysRevLett.56.632 ↗
16. Tersoff J (1988) Phys Rev Lett 61:287910.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2879 ↗
17. Sekkai W, Zaoui A (2002) New J Phys 4:9110.1088/1367-2630/4/1/391 ↗
18. Tersoff J (1989) Phys Rev B 39(8):556610.1103/PhysRevB.39.5566 ↗
19. Leach AR (1996) Molecular modeling. Addison Wesley Longman Limited, pp 316–317
20. Seong GK, David T (1999) Phys Rev Lett 72:2418
21. Nose S (1984) J Chem Phys 81(1):51110.1063/1.447334 ↗
22. Shen H (2006) Chinese J Mater Res 20(1):93
23. Wang L, Hu H (2004) Acta Mech Solida Sinica 25(3):233