Strain-rate dependence of the tensile strength of glass fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
It is well known that the strength of glass fibers increases with increasing strain rate. Consequently, impact strength of glass fiber is competitive with that of carbon fiber. This strengthening phenomenon is well recognized for bulk glass. Strain-rate dependence of the strength for bulk glass was described by considering slow crack growth in glass. The analytical model that considered the slow crack growth of glass is proposed to predict the strength of glass fibers. The proposed model considered the stress corrosion limit and a constant crack velocity region. Calculations showed almost same results with the previous model, however, some differences were confirmed. To discuss the validity of the analysis, tensile tests of E-glass fiber bundles were conducted at various strain rates. It was observed that the fracture behaviors differ with the strain rates. Experimental results showed that the strength of E-glass fibers increased with increasing strain rate. Furthermore, we confirmed that the analytical results were in good agreement with the experimental results. The strain-rate dependence of the strength of glass fibers was successfully predicted by considering the slow crack growth in glass.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Hayakawa M, Taniguchi N, Nishiwaki T, Hirayama N, Kawada H (2010) Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng A 76:65210.1299/kikaia.76.652 ↗
2. Yoshihiko A, Kotani M, Sato S, Kawada H (2010) J Jpn Soc Exp Mech 10:420
3. Harding J, Welsh LM (1983) J Mater Sci 18:1810. doi: 10.1007/BF0054207810.1007/BF00542078 ↗
4. Taniguchi N, Nishiwaki T, Hirayama N, Nishida H, Kawada H (2009) Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng A 75:128410.1299/kikaia.75.1284 ↗
5. Brown K, Brooks R, Warrior NA (2010) Compos Sci Technol 70:27210.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.018 ↗
6. Lee GD, Lim TS, Chen SS (2000) Compos Struct 20:38110.1016/S0263-8223(00)00117-3 ↗
7. Barre S, Chotard T, Benzeggagh L (1996) Compos A 27:116910.1016/1359-835X(96)00075-9 ↗
8. Cheon SS, Lee DG, Jeong KS (1997) Compos Struct 38:22910.1016/S0263-8223(97)00058-5 ↗
9. Wiederhorn SM, Johnson H, Diness AM, Heuer AH (1974) J Am Ceram Soc 54:33610.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb10917.x ↗
10. Wiederhorn SM (1978) Fracture mechanics of ceramics. Plenum Press, New York
11. Wiederhorn SM (1969) J Am Ceram Soc 52:9910.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb13350.x ↗
12. Pauchard V, Brochado S, Chateauminois A, Campion H, Grosjean F (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19:214110.1023/A:1026782928403 ↗
13. Charles RJ (1958) J Appl Phys 29:165710.1063/1.1723019 ↗
14. Evans AG (1974) Int J Fract 10:25110.1007/BF00113930 ↗
15. Nejma R, Lang KH, Lohe D (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 387–389:83210.1016/j.msea.2004.02.090 ↗
16. Marshall DB, Lawn BR (1980) J Am Ceram Soc 63:53210.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10759.x ↗
17. Muraoka M, Abe H (1996) J Am Ceram Soc 79:5110.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07879.x ↗
18. Muraoka A, Abe H (1991) Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng A 57:20010.1299/kikaia.57.672 ↗
19. Feih S, Manatpon K, Mathys Z, Gibson AG, Mouritz A (2009) J Mater Sci 44:392. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3140-x10.1007/s10853-008-3140-x ↗
20. Tanichi N, Arao Y, Nishiwaki T, Hirayama N, Nakamura K, Kawada H (2012) J Japan Society Compos Mater 3810.6089/jscm.38.137 ↗
21. Koike A, Tomozawa M, Ito S (2007) J Non-Cryst Solids 353:267510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.05.006 ↗
22. Koike A, Tomozawa M (2006) J Non-Cryst Solids 352:552210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.09.023 ↗