Influence of crystal orientation on the processing of copper single crystals by ECAP
Source abstract
Abstract
Single crystals of high-purity copper, having two different orientations, were pressed through one pass in equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) at room temperature and then examined using several different analytical techniques. For both orientations, it is shown that elongated arrays of cells or subgrains are formed in the first pass with their long axes aligned parallel to the primary $${(\bar {1}\bar {1}\bar {1})[\bar {1}10]}$$ slip system. The average width of these subgrains was measured as ∼0.2 μm which is similar to the equilibrium grain size reported in polycrystalline Cu after processing by ECAP. These results confirm earlier observations using an aluminum single crystal except only that the subgrain width in copper is significantly smaller. This difference is attributed to the lower stacking-fault energy in copper and the consequent low rate of recovery.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Valiev RZ, Islamgaliev RK, Alexandrov IV (2000) Prog Mater Sci 45:10210.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
2. Lowe TC, Zhu YT (2003) Adv Eng Mater 5:37310.1002/adem.200310076 ↗
3. Segal VM (1995) Mater Sci Eng A197:15710.1016/0921-5093(95)09705-8 ↗
4. Segal VM (2004) Mater Sci Eng A386:26910.1016/j.msea.2004.07.023 ↗
5. Horita Z, Fujinami T, Langdon TG (2001) Mater Sci Eng A318:3410.1016/S0921-5093(01)01339-9 ↗
6. Semiatin SL, DeLo DP (2000) Mater Design 21:31110.1016/S0261-3069(99)00085-0 ↗
7. Alexandrov IV, Raab GI, Shestakova LO, Valiev RZ, Dowding RJ (2000) In: Greenfield MS, Oakes JJ (eds) Tungsten, hard metals and refractory alloys 5. Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton NJ, pp 27–45
8. Furukawa M, Iwahashi Y, Horita Z, Nemoto M, Langdon TG (1998) Mater Sci Eng A257:32810.1016/S0921-5093(98)00750-3 ↗
9. Furukawa M, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2002) Mater Sci Eng A332:9710.1016/S0921-5093(01)01716-6 ↗
10. Fukuda Y, Oh-ishi K, Furukawa M, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2004) Acta Mater 52:138710.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.028 ↗
11. Furukawa M, Kawasaki Y, Miyahara Y, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2005) Mater Sci Eng A410–411:19410.1016/j.msea.2005.08.082 ↗
12. Fukuda Y, Oh-ishi K, Furukawa M, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2006) Mater Sci Eng A420:7910.1016/j.msea.2006.01.086 ↗
13. Iwahashi Y, Wang J, Horita Z, Nemoto M, Langdon TG (1996) Scr Mater 35:14310.1016/1359-6462(96)00107-8 ↗
14. Yoshida Y, Cisar L, Kamado S, Koike J, Kojima Y (2003) Mater Sci Forum 419–422:53310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.419-422.533 ↗
15. Kim HS, Seo MH, Hong SI (2000) Mater Sci Eng A291:8610.1016/S0921-5093(00)00970-9 ↗
16. Kim HS (2001) Mater Sci Eng A315:12210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01188-1 ↗
17. Park JW, Suh JY (2001) Metall Mater Trans A 32A:300710.1007/s11661-001-0175-x ↗
18. Kim HS (2002) J Mater Res 17:17210.1557/JMR.2002.0026 ↗
19. Semiatin SL, DeLo DP, Park JW (2002) J Mater Proc Tech 122:25510.1016/S0924-0136(02)00057-2 ↗
20. Iwahashi Y, Horita Z, Nemoto M, Langdon TG (1998) Acta Mater 46:331710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00494-1 ↗
21. Terhune SD, Swisher DL, Oh-ishi K, Horita Z, Langdon TG, McNelley TR (2003) Metall Mater Trans A 33A:2173
22. Iwahashi Y, Horita Z, Nemoto M, Langdon TG (1998) Metall Mater Trans A 29A:250310.1007/s11661-998-0222-y ↗
23. Komura S, Horita Z, Nemoto M, Langdon TG (1999) J Mater Res 14:404410.1557/JMR.1999.0546 ↗
24. Miyamoto H, Erb U, Koyama T, Mimaki T, Vinogradov A, Hashimoto S (2004) Philos Magn Lett 84:23510.1080/09500830410001663734 ↗
25. Miyamoto H, Fushimi J, Mimaki T, Vinogradov A, Hashimoto S (2005) Mater Sci Eng A405:22110.1016/j.msea.2005.05.091 ↗