journal article·2007-08-28

Effects of contact shape on biological wet adhesion

Yewang Su, Baohua Ji, Yonggang Huang, Kehchih Hwang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

Wet adhesion is widely adopted in biological adhesion systems in nature. Wet adhesion is studied in this paper with the focus on the effect of different contact shapes (flat, concave, convex, and ring-like) on the adhesion force. The evolution of the liquid bridge between a fiber tip and substrate during the detaching process shows two transition points. The first transition from the radius-controlled to the contact-angle controlled process is critical to influence the strength and robustness of adhesion. We show that a concave shape is more effective than a flat one, while a convex shape has no advantage. A ring-like contact shape has advantages in a hydrophobic environment and on a rough surface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Gao H, Wang X, Yao H, Gorb S, Arzt E (2005) Mech Mater 37:27510.1016/j.mechmat.2004.03.008 ↗
2. Federle W, Riehle M, Curtis ASG, Full RJ (2002) Integr Comp Biol 42:110010.1093/icb/42.6.1100 ↗
3. Gao H, Ji B, Buehler MJ, Yao H (2004) Mol Cel Biol 1:37
4. Jiao YK, Gorb S, Scherge M (2000) J Exp Biol 203:188710.1242/jeb.203.12.1887 ↗
5. Gorb S, Gorb E, Kastner V (2001) J Exp Biol 204:142110.1242/jeb.204.8.1421 ↗
6. Autumn K, Peattie AM (2002) Integr Comp Biol 42:108110.1093/icb/42.6.1081 ↗
7. Kesel AB, Martin A, Seidl T (2004) Smart Mater Struct 13:51210.1088/0964-1726/13/3/009 ↗
8. Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YCA, Peattie AM, Hansen WR, Sponberg S, Kenny TW, Fearing R, Israelachvili JN, Full RJ (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:1225210.1073/pnas.192252799 ↗
9. Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1060310.1073/pnas.1534701100 ↗
10. Orr FM, Scriven LE (1975) J Fluid Mech 67:72310.1017/S0022112075000572 ↗
11. Rabinovich YI, Adler JJ, Esayanur MS, Ata A, Singh RK, Moudgil BM (2002) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 96:21310.1016/S0001-8686(01)00082-3 ↗
12. Choe H, Hong MH, Seo Y, Lee K, Kim G, Cho Y, Ihm J, Jhe W (2005) Phys Rev Lett 9510.1103/PhysRevLett.95.187801 ↗
13. Huber G, Mantz H, Spolenak R, Mecke K, Jacobs K, Gorb SN, Arzt E (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1629310.1073/pnas.0506328102 ↗
14. Sun WX, Neuzil P, Kustandi TS, Oh S, Samper VD (2005) Biophys J 89:L1410.1529/biophysj.105.065268 ↗
15. Qian J, Gao HJ (2006) Acta Biomater 2:5110.1016/j.actbio.2005.08.005 ↗
16. Spolenak R, Gorb S, Gao H, Arzt E (2005) Proc R Soc London Ser A-Math Phys Eng Sci 461:30510.1098/rspa.2004.1326 ↗
17. Federle W, Brainerd EL, McMahon TA, Holldobler B (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:621510.1073/pnas.111139298 ↗
18. Gorb S, Jiao YK, Scherge M (2000) J Comp Physiol A-Sens Neural Behav Physiol 186:82110.1007/s003590000135 ↗
19. Gao H, Yao H (2004) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:785110.1073/pnas.0400757101 ↗
20. Scherge M, Gorb SN (2000) J Micromech Microeng 10:35910.1088/0960-1317/10/3/309 ↗
21. Langer MG, Ruppersberg JP, Gorb S (2004) Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 271:220910.1098/rspb.2004.2850 ↗
22. Saito S, Motokado T, Obata KJ, Takahashi K (2005) Appl. Phys Lett 87
23. Obata KJ, Motokado T, Saito S, Takahashi K (2004) J Fluid Mech 498:11310.1017/S0022112003006955 ↗
24. Fortes MA (1982) Powder Metall Int 14:96
25. Gao H, Ji B, Jager IL, Arzt E, Fratzl P (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:559710.1073/pnas.0631609100 ↗