Effect of UV exposure on the microstructure and mechanical properties of long fiber thermoplastic (LFT) composites
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, the effect of ultraviolet (UV) exposure on the microstructure and dynamic Young’s modulus of polypropylene (PP)/21 vol.% E-glass LFT and neat PP was investigated. Microscopic observations revealed that the damage due to UV was confined to the surface region only in the form of surface cracking and exposure of fibers to the surface in the case of long fiber thermoplastic (LFT) and surface cracking in the case of neat PP. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed that the crystallinity of PP in the damaged layer increased, both in neat PP as well as in LFT, with exposure time. This is due to chemicrystallization, which involves rearrangement of amorphous broken polymer chains into crystalline form. Crystallinity of PP in the damaged layer in LFT increased at a higher rate as compared to that in neat PP. Results of nanoindentation showed that the Young’s modulus of the PP in the damaged layer increased, with UV exposure time; the rate of modulus increase being higher in the case of LFT than in neat PP. Although the local Young’s modulus of the degraded layer increased, the dynamic Young’s modulus of the overall composite showed a decrease with UV exposure time.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Bartus SD, Vaidya UK (2005) Compos Struct 67:26310.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.023 ↗
2. Chawla KK (1998) Composite materials: science and engineering, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-2966-5 ↗
3. Qureshi FS, Amin MB, Maadhah AG, Hamid SH (1990) J Polym Eng 9:6710.1515/POLYENG.1990.9.1.67 ↗
4. Yakimets I, Lai D, Guigon M (2004) Polym Degrad Stab 86:5910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.01.013 ↗
5. Selden R, Nystrom B, Langstrom R (2004) Polym Compos 25:54310.1002/pc.20048 ↗
6. Lundlin T, Cramer SM, Falk RH, Felton C (2004) J Mater Civil Eng 16:54710.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(547) ↗
7. Lundlin T, Falk RH, Felton C (2001) Proceedings of the 6th International Woodfiber-Plastic Composites Conference, Forest Products Society, May, Madison, Wisconsin, p 87
8. Rabello MS, White JR (1997) Polym Degrad Stab 56:5510.1016/S0141-3910(96)00202-9 ↗
9. Larena A, Jiménez De Ochoa S, Domínguez F (2006) Polym Degrad Stab 91:94010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.034 ↗
10. Rabello MS, White JR (1997) Polymer 38:637910.1016/S0032-3861(97)00213-9 ↗
11. White JR, Turnbull A (1994) J Mate Sci 29:58410.1007/BF00445969 ↗
12. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
13. Li X, Bhushan B (2002) Mater Charact 48:1110.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
14. Simmons G, Wang H (1971) Single crystal elastic constants and calculated aggregate properties: a handbook. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
15. Karger-Kocsis J (ed) (1999) Polypropylene: an A-Z reference. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
16. ASTM E 1876–99 (1999) Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials
17. Tong L, White JR (1997) Polym Eng Sci 37:32110.1002/pen.11674 ↗
18. Signor AW, Vanlandingham MR, Chin JW (2003) Polym Degrad Stab 79:35910.1016/S0141-3910(02)00300-2 ↗