journal article·2025-09-23

Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Boundary Resistance of Low–Dielectric Constant Interlayer Dielectrics in Advanced Very Large Scale Integration Interconnects

Tianzhuo Zhan, Chong Zheng, Mao Xu, Zhi Cao, Yen-Ju Wu, Yibin Xu, Ryo Yokogawa, Atsushi Ogura, Yanming Xue, Haidong Wang, Mengjie Song, Wei Wang, Bo Chen, Takanobu Watanabe, Yonggang Jiang, Huawei Chen, Deyuan Zhang

ACS Applied Electronic Materials· Volume 7· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Low–dielectric constant (low- k ) interlayer dielectrics (ILDs) are necessary to reduce signal propagation delay and electronic crosstalk in advanced very large–scale integration (VLSI) circuits. The thermal conductivity of low- k ILDs substantially influences the temperature rise of VLSI interconnects, which in turn affects the performance and reliability of VLSI circuits. Furthermore, as the technology node is scaled, the thermal boundary resistance (TBR) between wires and low- k ILDs becomes increasingly critical for thermal management in VLSI interconnects. In this study, we experimentally investigated the thermal conductivities and TBRs of methylpolysiloxane-based low- k ILDs. The results showed that although a 5% increase in the methyl content minimally affected the thermal conductivity, it substantially increased the TBR, while curing enhanced both the thermal conductivity and TBR. Persistent homology analysis was performed on the transmission electron microscopy images of the low- k ILDs to extract hidden structural features and quantify the medium-range order, which further elucidated the mechanisms underlying the thermal conductivity modification. The enhanced thermal conductivities of the cured ILDs were attributed to both enhanced phonon group velocities and effective mean free paths of delocalized vibration modes owing to film densification. Fourier-transform infrared spectra revealed that variations in TBR were primarily attributed to modifications of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic functional groups. In the low- k ILDs, more hydrophobic methyl or fewer hydrophilic hydroxyl and silanol groups reduced interfacial bonding between the low- k ILD and its adjacent layers, thereby enhancing the TBR. Contact angle measurements revealed a linear relationship between the interfacial bonding strength and TBR. Our findings offer insights into thermal transport in low- k ILDs and at interfaces, which are both essential for developing next-generation thermally conductive low- k ILDs and composite thermal interface materials for thermal management in VLSI circuits.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian, Beijing 100191, China

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan

Department of Basic Science, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan

National Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashimita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 214-0033, Japan

School of Materials Science and Engineering

Hebei University of Technology

School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, 30 Shuangqing Road, Haidian, Beijing 100084, China

School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Street, Zhongguancun, Haidian, Beijing 100081, China

Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Science

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS). 2022.
2. Murdoch, G.; Tőkei, Zs.; Paolillo, S.; Pedreira, O. V.; Vanstreels, K.; Wilson, C. J. Semidamascene Interconnects for 2nm Node and Beyond IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC) 2020.10.1109/IITC47697.2020.9515597 ↗
3. 10.1109/TED.2016.255456110.1109/TED.2016.2554561 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41563-021-00934-310.1038/s41563-021-00934-3 ↗
5. 10.1002/advs.20220732110.1002/advs.202207321 ↗
6. Tőkei, Z.; Vega, V.; Murdoch, G.; O’Toole, M.; Croes, K.; Baert, R.; Van der Veen, M.; Adelmann, C.; Soulié, J. P.; Boemmels, J.; Wilson, C.; Park, S. H.; Sankaran, K.; Pourtois, G.; Sweerts, J.; Paolillo, S.; Decoster, S.; Mao, M.; Lazzarino, F.; Versluijs, J.; Blanco, V.; Ercken, M.; Kesters, E.; Le, Q.T.; Holsteyns, F.; Heylen, N.; Teugels, L.; Devriendt, K.; Struyf, H.; Morin, P.; Jourdan, N.; Van Elshocht, S.; Ciofi, I.; Gupta, A.; Zahedmanesh, H.; Vanstreels, K.; Na, M. H. Inflection Points in Interconnect Research and Trends for 2nm and Beyond in Order to Solve the RC Bottleneck, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2020; pp 32.2.1–32.2.4.10.1109/IEDM13553.2020.9371903 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.6b0718110.1021/acsami.6b07181 ↗
8. 10.1149/2.0271501jss10.1149/2.0271501jss ↗
9. Baklanov M. R. · 201210.1002/9781119963677 ↗
10. 10.1109/101.96068510.1109/101.960685 ↗
11. 10.1109/TED.2005.85961210.1109/TED.2005.859612 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.152430510.1063/1.1524305 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.483261510.1063/1.4832615 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat256810.1038/nmat2568 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12274-010-1019-z10.1007/s12274-010-1019-z ↗
16. 10.3390/mi1411207610.3390/mi14112076 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598-017-07150-710.1038/s41598-017-07150-7 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.0c0301010.1021/acsami.0c03010 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.1c2036610.1021/acsami.1c20366 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-023-42195-510.1038/s41467-023-42195-5 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.512482110.1063/1.5124821 ↗
22. 10.1038/s43246-020-00100-310.1038/s43246-020-00100-3 ↗
23. 10.1073/pnas.152087711310.1073/pnas.1520877113 ↗
24. 10.7566/JPSJ.91.09101310.7566/JPSJ.91.091013 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0265789410.1007/BF02657894 ↗
26. 10.7567/JJAP.50.10660210.7567/JJAP.50.106602 ↗
27. 10.1080/14686996.2018.146017710.1080/14686996.2018.1460177 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.00810.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.008 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.161835810.1063/1.1618358 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.09420510.1103/PhysRevB.65.094205 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.04402310.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.044023 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0995510.1021/acs.jpcb.5b09955 ↗
33. 10.1080/1364281990822305410.1080/13642819908223054 ↗
34. 10.1088/0268-1242/31/11/11300310.1088/0268-1242/31/11/113003 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms263010.1038/ncomms2630 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.05590210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.055902 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.486679910.1063/1.4866799 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.486712210.1063/1.4867122 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.37052310.1063/1.370523 ↗
40. 10.1038/nmat330310.1038/nmat3303 ↗
41. 10.1038/nmat346510.1038/nmat3465 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.348041310.1063/1.3480413 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.01400910.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.014009 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.0c0925310.1021/acsami.0c09253 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.15610110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.156101 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.18610110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.186101 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.481274910.1063/1.4812749 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.6b1207310.1021/acsami.6b12073 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsami.8b0370910.1021/acsami.8b03709 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.08530710.1103/PhysRevB.82.085307 ↗
51. 10.1149/1.266798010.1149/1.2667980 ↗
52. 10.1149/1.139338110.1149/1.1393381 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0133610.1021/acsomega.3c01336 ↗
54. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-4710.1186/1556-276X-9-47 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.09.02810.1016/j.apsusc.2006.09.028 ↗