Effect of polyurethane composition and the fabrication process on scaffold properties
Source abstract
Abstract
The microdomain structure of polyurethanes (PUR) determines their unique physical properties and makes polyurethanes attractive candidates for various tissue engineering applications. 3D scaffolds based on polyurethanes with different contents of hard segments were fabricated by a salt-leaching/polymer coagulation method. The process parameters were carefully considered, particularly the polymer solution concentration and characteristics of the polyurethane, which are the critical parameters for the control of porosity and pore size distribution. In this study, 3D polyurethane scaffolds were fabricated with interconnected pores and porosity from 64% to 80%. Pore size distribution was evaluated using quantitative image analysis and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). The scaffolds fabricated from polyurethanes with 70 wt.% of hard-domain content were found to have the best compression properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Polymer composites and self-healing · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Palsson B, Hubbell JA, Plonsey R et al (2003) Tissue engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida10.1201/9780203011423 ↗
2. Bronzino JD (2006) Tissue engineering and artificial organs. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida10.1201/9781420003871 ↗
3. Oh SH, Park IK, Kim JM et al (2007) Biomaterials 28:166410.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.024 ↗
4. Zhang Z, Wang Z, Liu S et al (2004) Biomaterials 25:17710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00478-2 ↗
5. Wei HJ, Liang H Ch, Lee MH et al (2005) Biomaterials 26:1905–191310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.014 ↗
6. Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR et al (1999) Tissue Eng 5:3510.1089/ten.1999.5.35 ↗
7. Lu JX, Flautre B, Anselme K (1999) J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:11110.1023/A:1008973120918 ↗
8. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Biomaterials 26:547410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
9. Hutmacher DW (2000) Biomaterials 21:252910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
10. Zhang J, Zhang H, Wu L, Ding J (2006) J Mater Sci 41:1725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-2873-710.1007/s10853-006-2873-7 ↗
11. Draghi L, Resta S, Pirozzolo MG, Tanzi MC (2005) J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:109310.1007/s10856-005-4711-x ↗
12. Chen G, Ushida T, Tateishi T (2001) Mater Sci Eng C 17:6310.1016/S0928-4931(01)00338-1 ↗
13. Mikos AG, Thorsen AJ, Czerwonka LA et al (1994) Polymer 35(5):106810.1016/0032-3861(94)90953-9 ↗
14. Van Tienen TG, Heijkants RGJC, Buma P et al (2002) Biomaterials 23:173110.1016/S0142-9612(01)00280-0 ↗
15. Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen J (2003) Biomaterials 24:193710.1016/S0142-9612(02)00562-8 ↗
16. Kim SS, Park MS, Jeon O et al (2006) Biomaterials 27:139910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.016 ↗
17. Hentze HP, Antonietti M (2002) Rev Mol Biotechnol 90:2710.1016/S1389-0352(01)00046-0 ↗
18. Lamba NMK, Woodhouse KA, Cooper SL (1997) Polyurethanes in biomedical applications. CRC Press, New York
19. Chen KS, Leon Yu T, Chen YS et al (2001) J Polym Res 82:9910.1007/s10965-006-0139-3 ↗
20. Sanchez-Adsuar MS (2000) Int J Adhes Adhes 20:29110.1016/S0143-7496(99)00059-7 ↗
21. Ioan S, Grigorescu G (2002) Eur Polym J 38:229510.1016/S0014-3057(02)00108-8 ↗
22. Tang YW, Labow RS, Santerre JP (2001) J Biomed Mater Res (2001) 56(4):51610.1002/1097-4636(20010915)56:4<516::AID-JBM1123>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
23. Takahara A, Tashita J, Kajiyama T et al (1985) J Biomed Mater Res 19:1310.1002/jbm.820190104 ↗
24. Guan J, Fujimoto KL, Sacksa MS, Wagner WR (2005) Biomaterials 26:396110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.018 ↗
25. Riboldi SA, Sampaolesi M, Neuenschwander P, Cossu G, Mantero S (2005) Biomaterials 26:460610.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.035 ↗
26. Grad S, Kupcsik L, Gorna K et al (2003) Biomaterials 24:516310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00462-9 ↗
27. Zhang J, Doll BA, Beckman EJ et al (2003) J Biomed Mater Res 67A:38910.1002/jbm.a.10015 ↗
28. Groot JH, Nijenhuis AJ, Bruin P et al (1990) Colloid Polym Sci 268:107310.1007/BF01410672 ↗
29. Wojnar L, Kurzydłowski KJ, Szala J (2002) Praktyka analizy obrazu Polskie Towarzystwo Steorologiczne, Kraków
30. Ho ST, Hutmacher DW (2006) Biomaterials 27:136210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.035 ↗
31. Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen J (2003) Biomaterials 24:1937–194710.1016/S0142-9612(02)00562-8 ↗
32. Heijkants RGJC, van Tienen TG, de Groot JH et al (2006) J Mater Sci 41:2423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7065-y10.1007/s10853-006-7065-y ↗
33. Lee HK, Kimb JY, Kimb YD, Shinb JY, Kimb SC (2001) Polymer 42:389310.1016/S0032-3861(00)00707-2 ↗
34. Nam YS, Park TG (1999) Biomaterials 20:178310.1016/S0142-9612(99)00073-3 ↗
35. Hacker M, Ringhofer M, Appel B et al (2007) Biomaterials 28:349710.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.018 ↗
36. Reignier J, Huneault MA (2006) Polymer 47:470310.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.029 ↗