Activation energy for growth in single size distribution and the dissolution features of γ′ precipitates in the superalloy IN738LC
Source abstract
Abstract
Activation energy for the growth of γ′ precipitates in single size unimodal distribution has been determined by annealing the solution-treated and quenched alloy with fine 70 nm size cooling precipitates at 1,040°, 1,080°, and 1,100 °C for different periods of time up to 100 h. Results obtained using the LSW matrix diffusion model concur with the deductions of earlier work that the activation energy for growth of precipitates in single size distribution is not a constant, but increases with increasing size of precipitates. Also, the activation energy plotted against the corresponding precipitate sizes yields a straight line with a positive slope. During long-time annealing, precipitate particles line up to reduce interactive free energy and grow to fairly coarse sizes along the matrix grain boundaries. Some of the particles in isolated islands or those lined along the matrix grain boundaries attain critical maximum sizes and begin to dissolve into the matrix in four different ways, designated as Modes 1 through 4. The various modes of dissolution are described and the possibility of repeated growth and dissolution in cycles is envisaged.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Balikci E, Raman A, Mirshams RA (1997) Met Mater Trans A 28A:199310.1007/s11661-997-0156-9 ↗
2. Balikci E (1998) Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
3. Roy I, Balikci E, Ibekwe S, Raman A (2005) J Mater Sci 40(23):620710.1007/s10853-005-3154-6 ↗
4. Miyazaki T, Imamura M, Kozakai T (1982) Mater Sci Eng 54:910.1016/0025-5416(82)90024-6 ↗
5. Doi M, Miyazaki T, Wakatsuki T (1984) Mater Sci Eng 67:24710.1016/0025-5416(84)90056-9 ↗
6. Yeom SJ, Yoon DY, Henry MF (1993) Met Trans A 24A:1975; see also references 14 to 19 given in that work for prior observation of octets10.1007/BF02666332 ↗
7. Khachaturyan AG, Semenovskaya SV, Morris JW Jr (1988) Acta Met 36(6):156310.1016/0001-6160(88)90224-6 ↗
8. Balikci E, Mirshams RA, Raman A (1999) Z Metallkd 90:132
9. Mughrabi H, Tetzlaff U (2000) Adv Eng Mater 2(6):31910.1002/1527-2648(200006)2:6<319::AID-ADEM319>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
10. Lifshitz I, Slyozov V (1961) J Phys Chem Solids 11:3510.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
11. Wagner C (1961) Z Electrochem 65:581
12. Baldan A (2002) J Mater Sci 37(12):239110.1023/A:1015408116016 ↗
13. Balikci E, Ferrell RE Jr, Raman A (1999) Z Metallkd 90:141
14. Kuehmann CJ, Voorhees PW (1996) Met Mater Trans 27A:93710.1007/BF02649761 ↗
15. Snyder VA, Alkemper J, Voorhees PW (2001) Acta Mater 49:69910.1016/S1359-6454(00)00342-6 ↗
16. Footner PK, Richards BP (1982) J Mater Sci 17(7):214110.1007/BF00540433 ↗
17. Ges A, Fornaro O, Palacio H (1997) J Mater Sci 32(14):368710.1023/A:1018694716756 ↗
18. Ardell AJ, Ozolins V (2005) Nat Mater 4:30910.1038/nmat1340 ↗
19. Roy I (2003) M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA