Fatigue property of semisolid A357 aluminum alloy under different heat treatment conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Effect of heat treatment conditions on fatigue property of a semisolid A357 aluminum alloy under cyclic tensile loading was investigated. Comparison of the fatigue property of the semisolid A357 under T5 and T6 heat treatment conditions with other aluminum alloys including conventional casting A357-T6 alloy and four wrought aluminum alloys: 2024-T4, 7075-T6, 5052-T6 and 6061-T6 was made. It is found that the fatigue strength of the semisolid A357 under both heat treatment conditions is much higher than that of the casting A357-T6 alloy, comparable to that of the 6061-T6, but lower than that of the 2024-T4 and 7075-T6. Two-parameter Weibull distribution of fatigue data for the semisolid A357 under the two heat treatment conditions was constructed to show the statistical significance in fatigue lifetime. Fatigue fracture surface of the semisolid A357 under T5 and T6 heat treatment conditions was examined using scanning electron microscope (SEM). In the stable crack propagation region, the semisolid A357-T5 shows fatigue damage species of severely deformed grains, void coalescence, striations and ridgelines, while the A357-T6 displays less plastic deformation as revealed by the fatigue damage features of intergranular cracks, and transgranular cleavage patterns.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Spencer DP, Mehrabian R, Flemings MC (1972) Metal Trans 3:192510.1007/BF02642580 ↗
2. Kirkwood DH (1993) Int Mat Rew 39:17310.1179/095066094790150946 ↗
3. Jung HK, Seo PK, Kang CG (2001) J Mater Process Technol 113:56810.1016/S0924-0136(01)00708-7 ↗
4. Kang CG, Jung KD (2001) J Mater Eng Perform 10:41910.1361/105994901770344836 ↗
5. McLelland ARA, Hendeeson NG, Atkinson HV, Kirkwood DH (1997) Mater Sci Eng A232:11010.1016/S0921-5093(97)00105-6 ↗
6. Kapranos P, Ward PJ, Atkinson HV, Kirkwood DH (2000) Mater Des 21:38710.1016/S0261-3069(99)00077-1 ↗
7. Witulskil T, Morjan U, Niedick I, Hirt G (1998) The thixoformability of aluminum alloys. In: Bhasin A, Moore JJ, Young KP, Midson S (eds) Proceedings of the fifth international conference on semisolid processing of alloys and composites, Golden (CO), p 353
8. Kapranios P, Liu TY, Atkinson HV, Kirkwood DH (2001) J Mater Process Technol 111:3110.1016/S0924-0136(01)00534-9 ↗
9. Jung HK, Kang CG (2002) J Mater Process Technol 120:35510.1016/S0924-0136(01)01162-1 ↗
10. Kang CG, Son YI, Youn SW (2001) J Mater Process Technol 113:25110.1016/S0924-0136(01)00707-5 ↗
11. Barkhudarov MR, Bosnisz CL, Hirt CW (1996) Three-dimensional thirotropic flow model. In: Kirkwood DH, Kapranos P (eds) Proceedings of the fourth international conference on semisolid processing of alloys and composites, Golden (CO), p 110
12. Kapranos P, Barkhudarov MR, Kirkwood DH (1998) Modeling of microstrauctural breakdown during rapid compression of semi-solid alloy slurries. In: Bhasin A, Moore JJ, Young KP, Midson S (eds) Proceedings of the fifth international conference on semisolid processing of alloys and composites, Golden (CO), p11
13. Avelle M, Belingardi G, Cavatorta MP, Doglione R (2002) Int J Fatigue 24:110.1016/S0142-1123(01)00112-8 ↗
14. Wang QG, Apelian D, Lados DA (2001) J Light Metals 1:7310.1016/S1471-5317(00)00008-0 ↗
15. Buffiere JY, Savelli S, Jouneau PH, Maire E, Fougeres R (2001) Mater Sci Eng A361:11510.1016/S0921-5093(01)01225-4 ↗
16. Tan YH, Lee SL, Wu HY (1996) Int J Fatigue 18:13710.1016/0142-1123(95)00034-8 ↗
17. Wang QG, Apelian D, Lados DA (2001) J Light Metals 1:8510.1016/S1471-5317(00)00009-2 ↗
18. Reinhart TL (1996) Fatigue and fracture properties of aluminum alloy castings. In: Lampman S (ed) Fracture and fatigue, vol 19. ASM Metals Handbook, Materials Park (OH) ASM International, p 81310.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002407 ↗
19. Beck T, Lang KH, Lohe D (2001) Mater Sci Eng A319–321:66210.1016/S0921-5093(00)02022-0 ↗
20. Buck A (1988) Fatigue data sheets. Fatigue strength calculation, Materials science surveys No.6, Brookfield, Trans Tech Publications, p 383
21. Bergsma SC, Li X, Kassner ME (2001) Materials Sci Eng A297:6910.1016/S0921-5093(00)01248-X ↗
22. Wang MZ, Kassner ME (2002) J Mater Eng Perform 11:167
23. Weibull W (1951) J Appl Mechanics 18:29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
24. Williams PT, Bass BR, McAfee MJ (2000) Application of the Weibull methodology to a shallow-flaw cruciform bend specimen tested under biaxial loading conditions. In: Halford GR, Gallagher JP (eds) Fatigue and fracture mechanics, ASTM STP 1389, vol.31. West Conshohocken (PA), American Society for Testing and Materials, p 24210.1520/STP14804S ↗
25. Anderson TL (1991) In: Fracture Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 714