Investigation on reliability of nanolayer-grained Ti3SiC2 via Weibull statistics
Source abstract
Abstract
Weibull modulus of bending strength of nanolayer-grained ceramic Ti3SiC2 was estimated with over 50 specimens, using the least square method, the moment method and the maximum likelihood technique, respectively. The result demonstrated that the m-value of this layered ceramic ranged from 25 to 29, which is much higher than that of traditional brittle ceramics. The reason of high Weibull modulus was due to high damage tolerance of this material. Under stress, delamination and kinking of grains and shear slipping at interfaces give this material high capacity of local energy dissipation and easy local stress relaxation, leading to the excellent damage tolerance of Ti3SiC2. The effect of amounts of specimens on the reliability of the estimated m-values was also investigated. It was confirmed that the stability of the estimated m-value increased with increasing numbers of specimens. The parameter obtained using the maximum likelihood technique showed the highest reliability than other methods. The ranges of failure probability were determined using the Weibull estimates calculated from the maximum likelihood technique.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Davidge RW (1979) Mechanical behavior of ceramics. Cambridge University Press, UK
2. Papargyris AD (1998) J Eur Ceram Soc 18:45110.1016/S0955-2219(97)00165-9 ↗
3. Weibull W (1951) J Appl Mech 18:25310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
4. Bergman W (1987) In: Freer R, Newsam S, Syers G (eds) Engineering with ceramics 2. British Ceramic Proceeding No. 39, Dec. 1987, p 175
5. Gong JH, Li Y (1999) J Am Ceram Soc 82:44910.1111/j.1551-2916.1999.tb20084.x ↗
6. ISO/TC 206/FDIS 20501:2003(E), Fine ceramics – Weibull statistics of strength data, 2003
7. Bao YW, Wang W, Zhou YC (2004) Acta Mater 52:539710.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.002 ↗
8. Bao YW, Hu CF, Zhou YC (2006) Mater Sci Technol 21:2710.1179/mte.2006.21.1.27 ↗
9. Kooi BJ, Poppen RJ, Carvalho NJM, Hosson JThM, Barsoum MW (2003) Acta Mater 51:285910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00091-0 ↗
10. Bao YW, Chen JX, Wang XH, Zhou YC (2004) J Eur Ceram Soc 24:85510.1016/S0955-2219(03)00328-5 ↗
11. Tzenov NV, Barsoum MW (2000) J Am Ceram Soc 83:82510.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01281.x ↗
12. Barsoun MW, El-Raghy T (1996) J Am Ceram Soc 79:195310.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08018.x ↗
13. Wang XH, Zhou YC (2002) Acta Mater 50:3141
14. Low IM, Lee SK, Lawn BR, Barsoum MW (1998) J Am Ceram 81:22510.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02320.x ↗
15. Dcosta DJ, Sun W, Lin F, El-Raghy T (2002) J Mater Process Tech 127:35210.1016/S0924-0136(02)00320-5 ↗
16. El-Raghy T, Zavaliangos A, Barsoum MW, Kalidindi SR (1997) J Am Ceram Soc 80:51310.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02861.x ↗