Effects of stoichiometry on electronic states of Au and Pt supported on TiO2(110)
Source abstract
Abstract
We have investigated electronic structures and charge transfers of Au and Pt supported on the TiO2(110) surface, using first-principles calculation. In order to investigate the effect of stoichiometry, we examined Au or Pt adsorption on three kinds of TiO2(110) surface with different stoichiometry; the stoichiometric surface, the surface formed by removing bridging-oxygen atoms (Ti-rich surface), and the surface formed by removing bridging-oxygen and sixfold titanium atoms (O-rich surface). We considered the on-top site above the bridging-oxygen atom (site A) or above the fivefold titanium atom (site B) for the stoichiometric surface, the bridging-oxygen vacant site (site C) for the Ti-rich surface, and the sixfold titanium vacant site (site D) for the O-rich surface as the adsorption site. The adhesive energies between the metal layer and the TiO2(110) surface for the nonstoichiometric surfaces are much lager than that of the stoichiometric surface. Moreover, the Pt atom is adsorbed more stable than the Au atom for the all surface stoichiometry. The interaction between the metal and the TiO2(110) surface depends on the surface stoichiometry and the kind of metal. The reason is that the charge transfers and the electronic structures of adsorbed metal depend on those.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. G. R. BAMWENDA, T. TSUBOTA, T. NAKAMURA and M. HARUTA, Catal. Lett 44 (1997) 83.10.1023/A:1018925008633 ↗
2. M. VALDEN, X. LAI and D. W. GOODMAN, Science 281 (1998) 1647.10.1126/science.281.5383.1647 ↗
3. T. KOBAYASHI, A. UEDA, Y. YAMADA and H. SHIOYAMA, Appl. Surf. Sci 223 (2004) 102.10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00905-X ↗
4. P. PANAGIOTOPOULOU and D. I. KONDARIDES, J. Catal 225 (2004) 327.10.1016/j.jcat.2004.04.030 ↗
5. S. ICHIKAWA, K. OKAZAKI, T. AKITA, M. OKUMURA, K. TANAKA and M. KOHYAMA, in “Spatially Resolved Characterization of Local Phenomena in Materials and Nanostructures”, edited by D. A. Bonnell, J. Piqueras, A. P. Shreve and F. Zypman, MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 738 (Material Research Society, Pittsburgh, 2003) p. 547.10.1557/PROC-738-G13.11 ↗
6. S. ICHIKAWA, T. AKITA, K. OKAZAKI, M. OKUMURA, K. TANAKA and M. KOHYAMA, “Continuous Nanophase and Nanostructured Materials”, edited by S. Komarneni, J. C. Parker and J. J. Watkins, MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 788 (Material Research Society, Pittsburgh, 2004) p. 443.10.1557/PROC-788-L8.21 ↗
7. L. THIÊN-NGA and A. T. PAXTON, Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998) 13233.10.1103/PhysRevB.58.13233 ↗
8. K. OKAZAKI, Y. MORIKAWA, S. TANAKA, K. TANAKA and M. KOHYAMA, ibid 69 (2004) 235404.10.1103/PhysRevB.69.235404 ↗
9. S. H. KE, T. UDA and K. TERAKURA, Appl. Surf. Sci 188 (2002) 319.10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00944-8 ↗
10. T. HAYASHI, Y. MORIKAWA and H. NOZOYE, J. Chem. Phys 114 (2001) 7615.10.1063/1.1360245 ↗
11. Y. MORIKAWA, T. HAYASHI, C. C. LIEW and H. NOZOE, Surf. Sci 507/510 (2002) 46.10.1016/S0039-6028(02)01173-1 ↗
12. N. LOPEZ and J. K. NØRSKOV, ibid 515 (2002) 175.10.1016/S0039-6028(02)01873-3 ↗
13. K. OKAZAKI, Y. MAEDA, Y. MORIKAWA, S. TANAKA and M. KOHYAMA, ibid in submitting.
14. Z. YANG, R. WU and D. W. GOODMAN, Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 14066.10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14066 ↗
15. L. M. MOLINA and B. HAMMER, ibid 69 (2004) 155424.10.1103/PhysRevB.69.155424 ↗
16. L. M. MOLINA, M. D. RASMUSSEN and B. HAMMER, J. Chem. Phys 120 (2004) 7673.10.1063/1.1687337 ↗