Deformation behavior of spray-formed hypereutectic Al–Si alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
The deformation behavior of spray-formed hypereutectic aluminum–silicon alloys—AlSix (x = 18, 25, and 35 wt%)—has been studied by means of compression test at various temperatures and strain rates. The flow stress of the spray-formed Al–Si alloys increases with decreasing compression temperature and increasing strain rate. Higher silicon content in the alloys also leads to higher flow stress during deformation. The flow curves determined from the compression tests exhibit that the deformation of the materials is controlled by two competing mechanisms: strain hardening, and flow softening. Particle damage during the deformation may have an influence on the flow curves of the alloys with large silicon particles. Based on the flow curves obtained from the compression tests and knowledge of aluminum extrusion, the spray-formed hypereutectic Al–Si alloy billets have been hot extruded into wires with a high area reduction ratio around 189. Since primary silicon particles were greatly refined and uniformly distributed in the spray-formed materials, the heavy deformations of the spray-formed Al–Si alloys containing high amount of silicon were successfully performed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Hatch JE (1984) Aluminium, properties and physical metallurgy. American Society for Metals, Metals Park
2. Wu Y, Cassada WA, Lavernia EJ (1995) Metall Mater Trans 26A:123510.1007/BF02670618 ↗
3. Yamauchi I, Ohnaka I, Kawamoto S, Fukusako T (1986) Trans Jpn Inst Met 27:19510.2320/matertrans1960.27.195 ↗
4. Lavernia EJ, Wu Y (1996) Spray atomization and deposition. Wiley, New York
5. Grant PS (1995) Prog Mater Sci 39:49710.1016/0079-6425(95)00004-6 ↗
6. Lawley A (2000) In: Bauckhage K, Uhlenwinkel V, Fritsching U (eds) Spray deposition and melt atomization SDMA 2000. University Bremen, Germany, p 3
7. Leatham AG (1999) Met Powder Rep 54:36
8. Grant PS (2007) Metall Mater Trans 38A:152010.1007/s11661-006-9015-3 ↗
9. Chiang CH, Tsao CYA (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 417:9010.1016/j.msea.2005.09.107 ↗
10. Chiang CH, Tsao CYA (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 396:26310.1016/j.msea.2005.01.017 ↗
11. Ha TK, Park WJ, Ahn S, Chang YW (2002) J Mater Process Technol 130–131:691
12. Hogg SC, Lambourne A, Ogilvy A, Grant PS (2006) Scr Mater 55:11110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.051 ↗
13. Johnston C, Crossley A (2004) MSTNEWS 4:14
14. Johnson W, Mellor PB (1973) Engineering plasticity. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, London
15. Dieter GE (1988) Mechanical metallurgy. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
16. Davis JR (1993) ASM specialty handbook, aluminum and aluminum alloys. ASM International, Materials Park
17. McQueen HJ (1998) J Met 50(6):28
18. Prasad YVRK, Seshacharyulu T (1998) Int Mater Rev 43(6):24310.1179/imr.1998.43.6.243 ↗
19. Xia X, McQueen HJ (1997) Appl Compos Mater 4:333
20. Xiao BL, Fan JZ, Tian XF, Zhang WY, Shi LK (2005) J Mater Sci 40:5757. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1292-510.1007/s10853-005-1292-5 ↗
21. Kouzeli M, Weber L, San Marchi C, Mortensen A (2001) Acta Mater 49:49710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00334-7 ↗
22. Kouzeli M, Weber L, San Marchi C, Mortensen A (2001) Acta Mater 49:369910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00279-8 ↗
23. San Marchi C, Cao F, Kouzeli M, Mortensen A (2002) Mater Sci Eng A337:20210.1016/S0921-5093(02)00035-7 ↗
24. Tshätsch H (1987) Handbuch Umformtechnik: Arbeitsverfahren, Maschinen, Werkzeuge, Hoppenstedt-Technik-Tab.-Verl., Darmstadt
25. Cui C, Schulz A, Matthaei-Schulz E, Zoch HW (2009) J Mater Sci 44:4814. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3734-y10.1007/s10853-009-3734-y ↗