Evaluation of cell proliferation and differentiation on a poly(propylene fumarate) 3D scaffold treated with functional peptides
Source abstract
Abstract
Synthetic polymers were used to fabricate a three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffold of poly(propylene fumarate)/diethyl fumarate (PPF/DEF). PPF-based materials are good candidates for bone regeneration, because of their non-toxic, biodegradable byproducts, and excellent mechanical properties. However, they exhibit hydrophobic surface properties that have negative effects on cell adhesion. To change the surface properties of a PPF/DEF scaffold, the authors used three peptide modifications (RGD, cyclo RGD, and RGD-KRSR mixture) to the scaffold and tested the effects on MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. The results indicated that peptide modification (particularly the RGD-KRDR mixture) altered the hydrophobic surface properties of the PPF/DEF scaffold, and promoted cell adhesion. Thus, it was suggest that peptide modification is a useful method for changing the properties of the PPF/DEF scaffold surface and may be applicable in bone tissue engineering.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Lan PX, Lee JW, Seol Y-J, Cho D-W (2009) J Mater Sci Mater Med 20(1):27110.1007/s10856-008-3567-2 ↗
2. Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H (2003) Biomaterials 24:438510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00343-0 ↗
3. Chen Y, Mak AFT, Wang M, Li J, Wong MS (2006) Surface Coatings Technol 201:57510.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.12.005 ↗
4. Tosatti S, Schwartz Z, Campbell C, Cochran DL, Vande Vondele S, Hubbell JA, Denzer A, Simson J, Wieland M, Lohmann CH, Textor M, Boyan BD (2005) J Biomed Mater Res A 68A(3):45810.1002/jbm.a.20082 ↗
5. Domb AJ (1989) US Patent 4888413
6. Domb AJ, Kost J, Wiseman DM (1997) Handbook of biodegradable polymers. Harwood Academic Publishers, London
7. Frazier DD, Lathi VK, Gerhart TN, Hayers WC (1997) J Biomed Mater Res 35:38310.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970605)35:3<383::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
8. Dettin Monica, Conconi MariaTeresa, Gambartto Roberta, Pasquato Antonella, Folin Marcella, Bello CarloDi, Parnigotto PierPaolo (2002) J Biomed Mater Res A 60(3):46610.1002/jbm.10066 ↗
9. Lee JW, Ahn G, Kim DS, Cho D-W (2009) Microelec Eng 86:146510.1016/j.mee.2008.12.038 ↗
10. Dee KC, Andersen TT, Bizios R (1998) J Biomed Mater Res 40(3):37110.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980605)40:3<371::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
11. Kim TG, Park TG (2006) Tissue Eng Bio 12(2):22110.1089/ten.2006.12.221 ↗
12. Lee JW, Jung JH, Kim DS, Lim G, Cho D-W (2009) Microelelc Eng 86:145110.1016/j.mee.2008.12.052 ↗
13. Lin Y-C, Brayfield CA, Gerlach JC, Rubin JP, Marra GK (2009) Acta Biomater 5:141610.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.031 ↗
14. Yoon JJ, Song SH, Lee DS, Park TG (2004) Biomaterials 25:561310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.014 ↗