The role of friction to the indentation size effect in amorphous and crystallized Pd-based alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The role of friction between the indenter and the test specimen in amorphous and crystallized Pd40Cu30Ni10P20 alloy was investigated through instrumented nanoindentation under unlubricated and lubricated conditions. It was found that the reduction of hardness with the increasing penetration depth, i.e., the indentation size effect (ISE), becomes milder in the lubricated test than that in the unlubricated measurement. The important role of friction that related to the surface area to volume (S/V) was discussed in terms of the proportional specimen resistance (PSR) model and energy dissipation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Schuh CA, Nieh TG (2004) J Mater Res 19:4610.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.46 ↗
2. Schuh CA (2006) Mater Today 9:3210.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X ↗
3. Joshi SS, Melkote SN (2004) J Manuf Sci Eng 126:67910.1115/1.1688375 ↗
4. Nix WD, Gao H (1998) J Mech Phys Solids 46:41110.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
5. Gao H, Huang Y, Nix WD (1999) Naturwissenschaften 86:50710.1007/s001140050665 ↗
6. Gao H, Huang Y, Nix WD et al (1999) J Mech Phys Solids 47:123910.1016/S0022-5096(98)00103-3 ↗
7. Li H, Ghosh A, Han YH et al (1993) J Mater Res 8:102810.1557/JMR.1993.1028 ↗
8. Atkinson M (1995) J Mater Res 10:290810.1557/JMR.1995.2908 ↗
9. Gerberich WW, Tymiak NI, Grunlan JC et al (2002) J Appl Mech 69:43310.1115/1.1469004 ↗
10. Skinner J, Gane N (1972) J Phys D: Appl Phys 5:208710.1088/0022-3727/5/11/316 ↗
11. Bull SJ, Page TF, Yoffe EH et al (1989) Philos Mag Lett 59:28110.1080/09500838908206356 ↗
12. Wei YG, Wang XZ, Zhao MH (2004) J Mater Res 19:20810.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.208 ↗
13. Wright WJ, Saha R, Nix WD (2001) Mater Trans 42:64210.2320/matertrans.42.642 ↗
14. Spaepen F (1977) Acta Metall 25:40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
15. Concustell A, Sort J, Alcalá G et al (2005) J Mater Res 20:271910.1557/JMR.2005.0331 ↗
16. Bei H, Xie S, George EP (2006) Phys Rev Lett 96:10550310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.105503 ↗
17. Van Steenberge N, Sort J, Concustell A et al (2007) Scr Mater 56:60510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.12.014 ↗
18. Yang FQ, Geng KB, Law PK et al (2007) Acta Mater 55:32110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.063 ↗
19. Lam DCC, Chong ACM (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 318:31310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01329-6 ↗
20. Li N, Chan KC, Liu L (2008) J Phys D: Appl Phys 41:15541510.1088/0022-3727/41/15/155415 ↗
21. Li N, Liu L, Chan KC et al (2009) J Mater Res (online)
22. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
23. Li H, Bradt RC (1993) J Mater Sci 28:917. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0040087410.1007/BF00400874 ↗
24. Shi H, Atkinson M (1990) J Mater Sci 25:2111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0104577410.1007/BF01045774 ↗
25. Sangwal K, Surowsk B, Błaziak P (2002) Mater Chem Phys 77:51110.1016/S0254-0584(02)00086-X ↗
26. Fröhlich F, Grau P, Grellmann W (1977) Phys Stat Sol 42:7910.1002/pssa.2210420106 ↗