Progress in the enhancement of gas–liquid mass transfer by porous nanoparticle nanofluids
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanofluids are a new mass transfer enhancement technology can effectively reduce mass transfer resistance, improve gas–liquid mass transfer rate and enhance absorption process. Using nanoparticles to enhance gas–liquid mass transfer could greatly reduce energy consumption, equipment size and industrial production costs. Different from traditional nanoparticles, this paper reviews the research results of gas–liquid mass transfer and the influence of porous nanoparticles for the first time. The gas–liquid mass transfer of nanofluids was related to the amount added, type, scale, morphology and surface functionalization of the nanoparticle. Transfer was also related to the physicochemical properties of base fluids and the strengthening sites. Enhancement mechanisms such as grazing effect, hydrodynamic action and the prevention of bubble coalescence were elaborated upon. Several research methods and related mathematical models were briefly introduced. Nonetheless, current research in this area is still in its infancy, so it is necessary to strengthen microscopic visualization and mathematical model research for future improvements in this area. The molecular mass simulation and collision theory should be used to quantitatively reveal the internal mass and energy transfer processes of nanofluids.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim YK, Lee SY, Oh BK (2016) Enhancement of formic acid production from CO2 in formate dehydrogenase reaction using nanoparticles. RSC Adv 6:109978–10998210.1039/C6RA23793B ↗
2. Muñoz R, Soto C, Zuñiga C et al (2018) A systematic comparison of two empirical gas–liquid mass transfer determination methodologies to characterize methane biodegradation in stirred tank bioreactors. J Environ Manag 217:247–25210.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.097 ↗
3. Madhvanand NK, Albert R, Lioubov KM (2011) Gas–liquid and liquid–liquid mass transfer in microstructured reactors. Chem Eng Sci 66:3876–389710.1016/j.ces.2011.05.015 ↗
4. Krieger W, Lamsfuß J, Zhang W et al (2017) Local mass transfer phenomena and chemical selectivity of gas–liquid reactions in capillaries. Chem Eng Technol 40:2134–214310.1002/ceat.201700420 ↗
5. Liu YZ (2009) Chemical engineering process and technology in high gravity. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing
6. Ezhov VK (2015) Distribution of the diffusion resistance to mass transfer between the liquid and vapor phases during rectification of mixtures. Atom Energy 118:265–27110.1007/s10512-015-9991-8 ↗
7. Fougerit V, Pozzobon V, Pareau D et al (2019) Experimental and numerical investigation binary mixture mass transfer in a gas–liquid membrane contactor. J Membr Sci 572:1–1110.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.042 ↗
8. Mansourizadeh A, Ismail AF (2009) Hollow fiber gas–liquid membrane contactors for acid gas capture: a review. J Hazard Mater 171:38–5310.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.026 ↗
9. Wenten IC, Julian H, Panjaitan NT (2012) Ozonation through ceramic membrane contactor for iodide oxidation during iodine recovery from brine water. Desalination 306:29–3410.1016/j.desal.2012.08.032 ↗
10. Choi SUS, Eastman JA (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. ASME Fed 231(MD66):99–105
11. Madhura KR, Babitha ISS (2017) Impact of heat and mass transfer on mixed convective flow of nanofluid through porous medium. Int J Appl Comput Math 3:1361–138410.1007/s40819-017-0424-3 ↗
12. Arya H, Sarafraz MM, Arjomandi M (2018) Heat transfer and fluid flow of MgO/ethylene glycol in a corrugated heat exchanger. J Mech Sci Technol 32:3975–398210.1007/s12206-018-0748-x ↗
13. Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F, Peyghambarzadeh SM et al (2015) Upward flow boiling to DI-water and CuO nanofluids inside the concentric annuli. J Appl Fluid Mech 8:651–65910.18869/acadpub.jafm.67.223.19404 ↗
14. Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F, Kamalgharibi M (2014) Sedimentation and convective boiling heat transfer of CuO–water/ethylene glycol nanofluids. Heat Mass Transf 50:1237–124910.1007/s00231-014-1336-y ↗
15. Sarafraz MM, Nikkhah V, Nakhjavani M (2018) Thermal performance of a heat sink microchannel working with biologically produced silver–water nanofluid: experimental assessment. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 91:509–51910.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.11.007 ↗
16. Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F (2016) Experimental investigation on the pool boiling heat transfer to aqueous multi-walled carbon nanotube nanofluids on the micro-finned surfaces. Int J Therm Sci 100:255–26610.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.10.006 ↗
17. Salari E, Peyghambarzadeh S, Sarafraz M et al (2016) Thermal behavior of aqueous iron oxide nano-fluid as a coolant on a flat disc heater under the pool boiling condition. Heat Mass Transf 53:1–11
18. Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F (2014) Forced convective and nucleate flow boiling heat transfer to alumina nanofluids. Chem Eng New York 58:37–46
19. Sarafraz MM, Arya A, Nikkhah V et al (2016) Thermal performance and viscosity of biologically produced silver/coconut oil nanofluids. Chem Biochem Eng Q 30:489–50010.15255/CABEQ.2015.2203 ↗
20. Salari E, Peyghambarzadeh M, Sarafraz MM et al (2016) Boiling heat transfer of alumina nano-fluids: role of nanoparticle deposition on the boiling heat transfer coefficient. Period Polytech Chem 60:252–25810.3311/PPch.9324 ↗
21. Nikkhah V, Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F (2015) Application of spherical copper oxide(II) water nano-fluid as a potential coolant in a boiling annular heat exchanger. Chem Biochem Eng Q 29:405–41510.15255/CABEQ.2014.2069 ↗
22. Hu ZS, Dong JX, Chen GX (1998) Study on antiwear and reducing friction additive of nanometer ferric oxide. Tribol Int 31:355–36010.1016/S0301-679X(98)00042-5 ↗
23. Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F, Silakhori M et al (2016) On the fouling formation of functionalized and non-functionalized carbon nanotube nano-fluids under pool boiling condition. Appl Therm Eng 95:433–44410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.11.071 ↗
24. Sarafraz MM, Nikkhah V, Madani SA et al (2017) Low-frequency vibration for fouling mitigation and intensification of thermal performance of a plate heat exchanger working with CuO/water nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 121:388–39910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.083 ↗
25. Sarafraz MM, Peyghambarzadeh SM (2012) Nucleate pool boiling heat transfer to Al2O3–water and TiO2–water nanofluids on horizontal smooth tubes with dissimilar homogeneous materials. Chem Biochem Eng Q 26:199–206
26. Hadad K, Rahimian A, Nematollahi MR (2013) Numerical study of single and two-phase models of water/Al2O3 nanofluid turbulent forced convection flow in VVER-1000 nuclear reactor. Ann Nucl Energy 60:287–29410.1016/j.anucene.2013.05.017 ↗
27. Li XK, Zou CJ, Qi AH (2016) Experimental study on the thermo-physical properties of car engine coolant (water/ethylene glycol mixture type) based SiC nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 77:159–16410.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.08.009 ↗
28. Arshad W, Ali HM (2017) Graphene nanoplatelets nanofluids thermal and hydrodynamic performance on integral fin heat sink. Int J Heat Mass Transf 107:995–100110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.10.127 ↗
29. Rafati M, Hamidi AA, Niaser MS (2012) Application of nanofluids in computer cooling systems (heat transfer performance of nanofluids). Appl Therm Eng 45–46:9–1410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.03.028 ↗
30. Nakhjavani M, Nikkhah V, Sarafraz MM et al (2017) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using green tea leaves: experimental study on the morphological, rheological and antibacterial behaviour. Heat Mass Transf 53:1–910.1007/s00231-017-2065-9 ↗
31. Mohammed HA, Al-aswadI AA, Shuaib NH et al (2011) Convective heat transfer and fluid flow study over a step using nanofluids: a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 15:2921–293910.1016/j.rser.2011.02.019 ↗
32. Saien J, Bamdadi H (2012) Mass transfer from nanofluid single drops in liquid–liquid extraction process. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:5157–516610.1021/ie300291k ↗
33. Krishnamurthy S, Bhattacharya P, Phelan PE et al (2006) Enhanced mass transport in nanofluids. Nano Lett 6:419–42310.1021/nl0522532 ↗
34. Beiki H, Esfahany MN, Etesami N (2013) Laminar forced convective mass transfer of γ-Al2O3/electrolyte nanofluid in a circular tube. Int J Therm Sci 64:251–25610.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.09.004 ↗
35. Kang TK, Kim HJ, Lee KI (2008) Heat and mass transfer enhancement of binary nanofluids for H2O/LiBr falling film absorption process. Int J Refrig 31:850–85610.1016/j.ijrefrig.2007.10.008 ↗
36. Ma XH, Su FM, Chen JB et al (2009) Enhancement of bubble absorption process using a CNTs-ammonia binary nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 36:657–66010.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.02.016 ↗
37. Park SY, Chang SH (2011) Measurement of local two-phase flow parameters of nanofluids using conductivity double-sensor probe. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:28410.1186/1556-276X-6-284 ↗
38. Wen T, Lin L, Zhong H (2018) Investigation on the dehumidification performance of LiCl/H2O–MWNTs nanofluid in a falling film dehumidifier. Build Environ 139:8–1610.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.010 ↗
39. Irani V, Tavasoli A, Vahidi M (2018) Preparation of amine functionalized reduced graphene oxide/methyl diethanolamine nanofluid and its application for improving the CO2 and H2S absorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 527:57–6710.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.018 ↗
40. Esmaeili Faraj SH, Nasr Esfahany M (2016) Absorption of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in water based nanofluids. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:4682–469010.1021/acs.iecr.5b04816 ↗
41. Lee J, Kim K, Chang IS et al (2016) Enhanced mass transfer rate of methane in aqueous phase via methyl-functionalized SBA-15. J Mol Liq 215:154–16010.1016/j.molliq.2015.12.041 ↗
42. Lee SY, Mo KS, Choi JH et al (2015) Enhancement of CH4–water mass transfer using methyl-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Korean J Chem Eng 32:1744–174810.1007/s11814-014-0383-x ↗
43. Irani V, Tavasoli A, Maleki A et al (2018) Polyethyleneimine-functionalized HKUST-1/MDEA nanofluid to enhance the absorption of CO2 in gas sweetening process. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:5610–561910.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.120 ↗
44. Vahidi M, Tavasoli A, Rashidi AM (2016) Preparation of amine functionalized UiO-66, mixing with aqueous N-methyldiethanolamine and application on CO2 solubility. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 28:651–65910.1016/j.jngse.2015.11.050 ↗
45. Maleki A, Vahid I, Tavasoli A et al (2018) Enhancement of CO2 solubility in a mixture of 40 wt% aqueous N-methyldiethanolamine solution and diethylenetriamine functionalized graphene oxide. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 55:219–23410.1016/j.jngse.2018.04.032 ↗
46. Kanawade RB, Vaidya PD, Subramanian K et al (2016) On the Acceleration of CO2 reaction with N-ethyldiethanolamine in aqueous solutions by the addition of promoters. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:38–4410.1021/acs.iecr.5b02496 ↗
47. Khan AA, Halder G, Saha AK (2017) Experimental investigation on efficient carbon dioxide capture using piperazine (PZ) activated aqueous methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) solution in a packed column. Int J Greenh Gas Control 64:163–17310.1016/j.ijggc.2017.07.016 ↗
48. Jafari B, Rahimi MR, Ghaedi M et al (2018) CO2 capture by amine-based aqueous solution containing atorvastatin functionalized mesocellular silica foam in a counter-current rotating packed bed: central composite design modeling. Chem Eng Res Des 129:64–7410.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.005 ↗
49. Tan TE (2013) Principle of chemical industry. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing
50. Whitman W (1962) The two film theory of gas absorption. Int J Heat Mass Transf 5:429–43310.1016/0017-9310(62)90032-7 ↗
51. Higbie R (1935) The rate of absorption of a pure gas into a still liquid during short periods of exposure. Inst Chem Eng 31:365–389
52. Danckwerts PV (1951) Significance of liquid–film coefficients in gas absorption. Ind Eng Chem 43:1460–146710.1021/ie50498a055 ↗
53. Kars RL, Best RJ, Drinkenburg AAH (1979) The sorption of propane in slurries of active carbon in water. Chem Eng J 17:201–21010.1016/0300-9467(79)80104-5 ↗
54. Ashrafmansouri SS, Esfahany MN (2014) Mass transfer in nanofluids: a review. Int J Therm Sci 82:84–9910.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.03.017 ↗
55. Sheng W, Wu WD, Zhang H et al (2012) Mechanism analysis on performance enhancement of ammonia bubble absorption by nanofluid. Adv Mater Res 433–440:195–20110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.195 ↗
56. Alper E, Wichtendahl B, Deckwer WD (1980) Gas absorption mechanism in catalytic slurry reactors. Chem Eng Sci 35:217–22210.1016/0009-2509(80)80090-X ↗
57. Zhang ZE, Cai JC, Chen F et al (2018) Progress in enhancement of CO2 absorption by nanofluids: a mini review of mechanisms and current status. Renew Energy 118:527–53510.1016/j.renene.2017.11.031 ↗
58. Kluytmans JH, Wachem BGMV, Kuster BFM et al (2003) Mass transfer in sparged and stirred reactors: influence of carbon particles and electrolyte. Chem Eng Sci 58:4719–472810.1016/j.ces.2003.05.004 ↗
59. Kim JH, Jung CW, Kang TK (2014) Mass transfer enhancement during CO2 absorption process in methanol/Al2O3 nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 76:484–49110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.04.057 ↗
60. Kluytmans JHJ, Kuster BFM, Schouten JC (2001) Gas holdup in a slurry bubble column: influence of electrolyte and carbon particles. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:5326–533310.1021/ie001078r ↗
61. Van DZM, Hamerama PJ, Poels EK et al (1999) Gas–solid adhesion and solid–solid agglomeration of carbon supported catalysts in three phase slurry reactors. Catal Today 48:131–13810.1016/S0920-5861(98)00367-8 ↗
62. Ruthiya KC, Schaaf JVD, Kuster BFM et al (2004) Modeling the effect of particle-to-bubble adhesion on mass transport and reaction rate in a stirred slurry reactor: influence of catalyst support. Chem Eng Sci 59:5551–555810.1016/j.ces.2004.07.097 ↗
63. Craig VSJ (2004) Bubble coalescence and specific-ion effects. Curr Opin Colloid Interface 9:178–18410.1016/j.cocis.2004.06.002 ↗
64. Roizard C, Poncin S, Lapicque F et al (1999) Behavior of fine particles in the vicinity of a gas bubble in a stagnant and a moving fluid. Chem Eng Sci 54:2317–232310.1016/S0009-2509(98)00415-1 ↗
65. Ruthiya KC, Kuster BFM, Schouten JC (2010) Gas–liquid mass transfer enhancement in a surface aeration stirred slurry reactors. Can J Chem Eng 81:632–63910.1002/cjce.5450810340 ↗
66. Evans W, Fish J, Keblinski P (2006) Role of Brownian motion hydrodynamics on nanofluid thermal conductivity. Appl Phys Lett 88:219–482
67. Sonawane S, Bhandarkar U, Puranik B et al (2012) Convective heat transfer characterization of aviation turbine fuel–metal oxide nanofluids. J Thermophys Heat Transf 26:619–62810.2514/1.T3893 ↗
68. Munyalo JM, Zhang X (2018) Particle size effect on thermophysical properties of nanofluid and nanofluid based phase change materials: a review. J Mol Liq 265:77–8710.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.129 ↗
69. Golkhar A, Keshavarz P, Mowla D (2012) Investigation of CO2 removal by silica and CNT nanofluids in microporous hollow fiber membrane contactors. J Membr Sci 433:17–2410.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.022 ↗
70. Rezakazemi M, Darabi M, Soroush E et al (2019) CO2 absorption enhancement by water-based nanofluids of CNT and SiO2 using hollow-fiber membrane contactor. Sep Purif Technol 210:920–92610.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.005 ↗
71. Lee JK, Koo J, Hong HK et al (2010) The effects of nanoparticles on absorption heat and mass transfer performance in NH3/H2O binary nanofluids. Int J Rrefrig 33:269–27510.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.10.004 ↗
72. Zhu H, Shanks BH, Heindel TJ (2008) Enhancing CO–water mass transfer by functionalized MCM-41 nanoparticles. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:7881–788710.1021/ie800238w ↗
73. Zhu H, Shanks BH, Choi DW et al (2010) Effect of functionalized MCM-41 nanoparticles on syngas fermentation. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1624–162710.1016/j.biombioe.2010.06.008 ↗
74. Jorge L, Coulombe S, Girard-Lauriault PL (2016) Nanofluids containing MWCNTs coated with nitrogen-rich plasma polymer films for CO2 absorption in aqueous medium. Plasma Process Polym 12:1311–132110.1002/ppap.201500040 ↗
75. Ahn B, Park SE, Oh BK et al (2018) Effect of nanoparticle on cellular growth and lipid production in Chlorella vulgaris culture. Biotechnol Prog 34:929–93310.1002/btpr.2641 ↗
76. Cui M, Chen S, Qi T et al (2018) Investigation of CO2 capture in nonaqueous ethylethanolamine solution mixed with porous solids. J Chem Eng Data 63:1198–120510.1021/acs.jced.7b00761 ↗
77. Beiki H, Esfahany MN, Etesami N et al (2013) Turbulent mass transfer of Al2O3 and TiO2 electrolyte nanofluids in circular tube. Microfluid Nanofluid 15:501–50810.1007/s10404-013-1167-z ↗
78. Amaris C, Bourouis M, Vallès M (2014) Passive intensification of the ammonia absorption process with NH3/LiNO3 using carbon nanotubes and advanced surfaces in a tubular bubble absorber. Energy 68:519–52810.1016/j.energy.2014.02.039 ↗
79. Ozturk S, Hassan YA, Ugaz VM (2010) Interfacial complexation explains anomalous diffusion in nanofluids. Nano Lett 10:665–67110.1021/nl903814r ↗
80. Ashrafmansouri SS, Esfahany MN, Azimi G et al (2014) Experimental investigation of water self-diffusion coefficient and tracer diffusion coefficient of tert-butanol in water-based silica nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 86:166–17410.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.07.002 ↗
81. Jiang JZ, Zhang S, Liu L (2018) A microscopic experimental study of nanoparticle motion for the enhancement of oxygen absorption in nanofluids. Nanotechnol Rev 7:529–53910.1515/ntrev-2018-0072 ↗
82. Qian M, Yan Q, Ni XW et al (2010) Detection of nanoparticle brownian motions in a nanofluid using laser speckle velocimetry. Laser Eng 20:117–128
83. Pecora R (1976) Dynamic light scattering. Plenum Press, New York
84. Veilleux J, Coulombe S (2010) A total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy study of mass diffusion enhancement in water-based alumina nanofluids. J Appl Phys 108:10431610.1063/1.3514138 ↗
85. Sara ON, İçer F, Yapici S et al (2011) Effect of suspended CuO nanoparticles on mass transfer to a rotating disc electrode. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 35:558–56410.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.12.011 ↗
86. Komati S, Suresh AK (2010) Anomalous enhancement of interphase transport rates by nanoparticles: effect of magnetic iron oxide on gas–liquid mass transfer. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:390–40510.1021/ie900302z ↗
87. Lu SM, Xing M, Sun Y et al (2013) Experimental and theoretical studies of CO2 absorption enhancement by nano-Al2O3 and carbon nanotube particles. Chinese J Chem Eng 21:983–99010.1016/S1004-9541(13)60550-9 ↗
88. Sakiyama R, Hamada H, Blau B et al (2018) Evaluation of the mass transfer rate using computer simulation in a three-dimensional interwoven hollow fiber-type bioartificial liver. Biotechnol Lett 40:1567–157810.1007/s10529-018-2609-1 ↗
89. Wein O (2012) Estimate of mass-transfer rate via Nernst model with Ohmic losses. Russ J Electrochem 48:704–71110.1134/S1023193512060134 ↗
90. Holstvoogd RD, Rtasionaki KJ (1986) Penetration model in a slurry containing finite insoluble particle. Chem Eng Sci 41:867–87310.1016/0009-2509(86)87169-X ↗
91. Zhang GD, Cai WF, Xu CJ et al (2006) A general enhancement factor model of the physical absorption of gases in multiphase systems. Chem Eng Sci 61:558–56810.1016/j.ces.2005.07.035 ↗
92. Kratochvíl J, Kaštánek F (1989) Mass transfer rate from gas bubbles into liquid in presence of solid particles with strong adsorbing properties. Collect Czech Chem C 54:3061–306810.1135/cccc19893061 ↗
93. Nagy E, Feczkó T, Koroknai B (2007) Enhancement of oxygen mass transfer rate in the presence of nanosized particles. Chem Eng Sci 62:7391–739810.1016/j.ces.2007.08.064 ↗
94. Demmink JF, Mehra A, Beenackers AACM (1998) Gas absorption in the presence of particles showing interfacial affinity: case of fine sulfur precipitates. Chem Eng Sci 53:2885–290210.1016/S0009-2509(98)00104-3 ↗
95. Brilman DWF, Goldschmidt MJV, Versteeg GF et al (2000) Heterogeneous mass transfer models for gas absorption in multiphase systems. Chem Eng Sci 55:2793–281210.1016/S0009-2509(99)00491-1 ↗
96. Darabi M, Rahimi M, Dehkordi AM (2017) Gas absorption enhancement in hollow fiber membrane contactors using nanofluids: modeling and simulation. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 119:7–1510.1016/j.cep.2017.05.007 ↗
97. Rezakazemi M, Darabi M, Soroush E et al (2019) CO2 absorption enhancement by water-based nanofluids of CNT and SiO2 using hollow-fiber membrane contactor. Sep Purif Technol 210:920–92610.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.005 ↗
98. Hamida MBBEN, Belghaieb J, Hajji N (2018) Numerical study of heat and mass transfer enhancement for bubble absorption process of ammonia–water mixture without and with nanofluids. Therm Sci 22:3107–312010.2298/TSCI170313229B ↗
99. Wang G, Zhang QL, Zeng M et al (2018) Investigation on mass transfer characteristics of the falling film absorption of LiBr aqueous solution added with nanoparticles. Int J Refrig 89:149–15810.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.01.017 ↗
100. Koronaki IP, Nitsas MT, Vallianos CA (2016) Enhancement of carbon dioxide absorption using carbon nanotubes—a numerical approach. Appl Therm Eng 99:1246–125310.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.02.030 ↗