journal article·2000-05

Prediction of intrinsic fracture toughness for brittle materials from the apparent toughness of notched-crack specimen

Wang Fenghui

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

In this investigation, fracture process zone model is used to establish a new relationship to predict the intrinsic fracture toughness from the apparent fracture toughness of a notched-crack specimen. The parameters needed in the proposed model are very rare, such as, the fracture process zone size of materials, the notch radius. Specimens made up of two kinds of polycrystalline alumina and one soda-lime glass with notch radii as small as a few micrometer are used to verify the predictions of this model. Besides, the results also show that fracture toughness of ceramics decreases with the decreasing of notch root radius. Under condition of the radius of crack tip is not greater than the averaged grain size, the apparent toughness can be approximately regarded as the fracture toughness of the materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Q. C. Zhang, “Mechanical Properity of Ceramics,” (Science Press Beijing, 1987).
2. M. Mizuno and H. Okada, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (1995) 1793.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08891.x ↗
3. T. Nose and T. Fuji, ibid. 71(5) (1988) 323.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05049.x ↗
4. L. Ewart and S. Suresh, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 5 (1986) 774.10.1007/BF01730087 ↗
5. M. J. Reece, F. Guiu and M. F. R. Sammu, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73(2) (1993) 348.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06133.x ↗
6. Z. X. He, Master thesis, Northwestern Polytechnic University, 1992.
7. V. E. Annamalai, R. Ponraj, S. Ramakrishna Iyer, C. V. Gularathnam and R. Krishnamurthy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(3) (1993) 785.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03680.x ↗
8. S. M. Wiederhorn, “Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Vol. 2” (Plenum, New York, 1974) p. 613.10.1007/978-1-4615-7014-1_12 ↗
9. T. Nishida, Y. Hanaki and G. Pezzotti, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77(2) (1994) 606.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07038.x ↗
10. F. E. Buresh, ASTM STP678 151-165 1979, Philadephia P A.
11. R. J. Myers and B. M. Hillbery, “Fracture, Vol. 3B,” edited by D. M. R. Taplin (Pergamon Press, New York, 1977) p. 1001.
12. Z. D. Zhuan, “Physics Property of Inorganic Materials” (Qinghua Univ Press, Beijing, 1992).
13. F.-H. Wang, Liu Wei, Lu Minxu and Zheng Xiulin, J. Inorganic Mater 12(1) (1997) 121.
14. S. Usami, H. Kimoto, I. Takahashi and S. Shida, Eng. Fract. Mech. 23(4) (1986) 745.10.1016/0013-7944(86)90120-7 ↗
15. T. Hoshide, ibid. 44(3) (1993) 403.10.1016/0013-7944(93)90032-N ↗
16. E. R. Delos, K. Ando and R. H. Biddulph, Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct. 13 (1990) 431.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1990.tb00613.x ↗
17. K. Ando, B. A. Kim, M. Iwasa and N. Ogura, ibid. 15(2) (1992) 139.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1992.tb00044.x ↗
18. Y. Bao and Z. Jin, ibid. 16(8) (1993) 829.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00122.x ↗
19. G. A. Irwin, J. Appl. Mech. 24 (1957) 361.10.1115/1.4011547 ↗
20. Z. B. Kuang, Eng. Fract. Mech. 16(1) (1982) 19.10.1016/0013-7944(82)90032-7 ↗
21. H. M. Westgarad, J. Appl. Mech. 61 (1939) A49.10.1115/1.4008919 ↗
22. M. Sakai and R. C. Bradt, Int. Mater. Reviews 38(2) (1993) 53.10.1179/imr.1993.38.2.53 ↗
23. R. L. Bertolotti, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 56 (1973) 107.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1973.tb12373.x ↗
24. T. Takahashi, S. Usami, K. Nakakadom, H. Miyata and S. Shida, J. Ceram. Soc. Japan 93 (1985) 186.