Kinetics of orthorhombic martensite decomposition in TC21 alloy under isothermal conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
The kinetics of martensite decomposition in TC21 alloy was investigated at isothermal conditions in the temperature range 500–850 °C. The dilatometry technique was utilized to trace the transformation process for different aging temperatures. Within the framework of the Avrami theory, the analysis of the experimental data was made by means of the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami (JMA) equation. A very good correspondence between the calculated and the experimental results was found. The JMA kinetic parameters obtained from different aging temperatures implied different mechanisms of the transformation. The α″ phase transforms to α + α″ (rich) at 500 °C and the transformation is incomplete. Further increase of the temperature to 800 and 850 °C results in directly transformation α″ →α + β. The mechanism of the transformation alters during the course of the transformation for 550, 600, 650, 700, and 750 °C. Moreover, The TTT diagram was constructed for the martensite decomposition in TC21 alloy based on the dilatometry analysis and JMA theory, respectively. Good agreement between experimental and calculated TTT diagram is observed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Qu HL, Zhou YG, Zhou L, Zhao YQ, Zeng WD, Feng L, Yang YQ, Chen J, Yu HQ, Li H, Zhang YN, Guo HC (2005) Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 15:1120
2. Wang X, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Hou H, Zeng W (2010) J Alloys Compd 490:56210.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.081 ↗
3. Zhu Y, Zeng W, Sun Y, Feng F, Zhou Y (2011) Comp Mater Sci 50:178510.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.015 ↗
4. Zhu Y, Zeng W, Feng F, Sun Y, Han Y, Zhou Y (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 528:175710.1016/j.msea.2010.11.015 ↗
5. Wang Y, Kou H, Chang H, Zhu Z, Zhang F, Li J, Zhou L (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 508:7610.1016/j.msea.2008.12.019 ↗
6. Nag S, Banerjee R, Fraser H (2009) J Mater Sci 44:808. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3148-210.1007/s10853-008-3148-2 ↗
7. Nag S, Banerjee R, Stechschulte J, Fraser HL (2005) J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:67910.1007/s10856-005-2540-6 ↗
8. Tang X, Ahmed T, Rack HJ (2000) J Mater Sci 35:1805. doi: 10.1023/A:100479292215510.1023/A:1004792922155 ↗
9. Grujicic M, Zhang Y (2000) J Mater Sci 35:4635. doi: 10.1023/A:100482630128710.1023/A:1004826301287 ↗
10. Wyatt Z, Ankem S (2010) J Mater Sci 45:5022. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4178-010.1007/s10853-009-4178-0 ↗
11. Hao Y, Yang R, Niinomi M, Kuroda D, Zhou Y, Fukunaga K, Suzuki A (2002) Metall Mater Trans A 33:313710.1007/s11661-002-0299-7 ↗
12. Zhou YL, Niinomi M, Akahori T (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 384:9210.1016/j.msea.2004.05.084 ↗
13. Lee YT, Welsch G (1990) Mater Sci Eng A 128:7710.1016/0921-5093(90)90097-M ↗
14. Yang Y, Li GP, Cheng GM, Wang H, Zhang M, Xu F, Yang K (2008) Scr Mater 58:910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.010 ↗
15. Zhang XD, Wiezorek JMK, Baeslack WA, Evans DJ, Fraser HL (1998) Acta Mater 46:448510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00158-X ↗
16. Szkliniarz W, Smolka G (1995) J Mater Process Technol 53:41310.1016/0924-0136(95)01998-T ↗
17. Wang Y, Kou H, Chang H, Zhu Z, Su X, Li J, Zhou L (2009) J Alloys Comp 472:25210.1016/j.jallcom.2008.04.035 ↗
18. Johnson WA, Mehl RF (1939) Trans Am Inst Miner Metall Eng 135:416
19. Avrami M (1939) J Chem Phys 7:110310.1063/1.1750380 ↗
20. Avrami M (1940) J Chem Phys 8:21210.1063/1.1750631 ↗
21. Avrami M (1941) J Chem Phys 9:17710.1063/1.1750872 ↗
22. Christian JW (1975) The theory of transformations in metals and alloys. Pergamon Press, Oxford
23. Furlani AM, Stipcich M, Romero R (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 392:38610.1016/j.msea.2004.10.015 ↗
24. Bein S, Bechet J (1996) J Phys 6:99
25. Malinov S, Sha W, Markovsky P (2003) J Alloys Compd 348:11010.1016/S0925-8388(02)00804-6 ↗