journal article·2007-07

Effect of different polypropylenes and compatibilizers on the rheological, mechanical and morphological properties of nylon 6/PP blends

Pankaj Agrawal, Silvia I. Oliveira, E. M. Araújo, Tomas J. A. Melo

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, the rheological, mechanical and morphological properties of nylon 6/polypropylene compatibilized blends were investigated. Two types of polypropylene were used. One with MFI of 40 g/10 min (PP H103) and the other with MFI of 3.5 g/10 min (PP H503). The compatibilizers used were polypropylene grafted with 6% of acrylic acid (PPgAA) and polypropylene grafted with 1% of maleic anhydride (PPgMA). The blends composition was 80/20 (wt%) for the PA6/PP binary blends and 80/10/10(wt%) for the nylon 6/PPgAA/polypropylene and nylon 6/PPgMA/polypropylene ternary blends. Torque rheometry analysis showed that when PPgAA and PPgMA were added to nylon 6/polypropylene blends, there was an increase in the torque, indicating that reactive compatibilization has occurred. There is no influence of the polypropylene MFI on the mechanical properties of the uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends. The impact strength of the blends containing PPgMA were greater than those of the blends containing PPgAA. The blends containing PPgAA are unstable. SEM analysis showed that PPgMA improves considerably the adhesion between PA6/PP phases, leading to good mechanical properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Ebeling T, Norek S, Hasan A, Hiltner A, Baer E (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 71:146110.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990228)71:9<1461::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
2. Zhahoui L, Zhang X, Tasaka S, Inagaki N (2001) Mater Lett 48:8110.1016/S0167-577X(00)00283-4 ↗
3. Piglowski J, Gancarz I, Wlazlak M, Kammer HW (2000) Polymer 41:681310.1016/S0032-3861(00)00034-3 ↗
4. Campoy I, Arribas JM, Zaporta MAM, Marco C, Gómez MA, Fatou JG (1995) Eur Polym J 05:47510.1016/0014-3057(94)00185-5 ↗
5. Sacchi A, Di Landro L, Pegoraro M, Severine F (2004) Eur Polym J 40:170510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.03.025 ↗
6. Dagli SS, Xanthos M, Biesenberger JA (1994) Polym Eng Sci 34:172010.1002/pen.760342303 ↗
7. Roeder J, Oliveira RVB, Gonçalves MC, Soldi V, Pires ATN (2002) Polym Test 21:81510.1016/S0142-9418(02)00016-8 ↗
8. Xiaomin Z, Gang L, Dongmei W, Zhihui Y, Jinghua Y (1998) Polymer 39:1510.1016/S0032-3861(97)00251-6 ↗
9. Tedesco A, Barbosa RV, Nachtigall SMB, Mauler RS (2002) Polym Test 21:1110.1016/S0142-9418(01)00038-1 ↗
10. Tseng FP, Lin JJ, Tseng CR, Chang FC (2001) Polymer 42:71310.1016/S0032-3861(00)00400-6 ↗
11. Ohsson B, Hassander H, Törnell B (1998) Polymer 39:670510.1016/S0032-3861(97)10290-7 ↗
12. Araújo EM, Hage E Jr, Carvalho AJF (2003) J Mater Sci 38:351510.1023/A:1025648508152 ↗
13. Araújo EM, Hage E Jr, Carvalho AJF (2004) J Mater Sci 39:117310.1023/B:JMSC.0000013872.86575.36 ↗
14. Araújo EM, Hage E Jr, Carvalho AJF (2005) J Mater Sci 40:423910.1007/s10853-005-2842-6 ↗
15. Valenza A, Geuskens G, Spadaro G (1997) Eur Polym J 33:95710.1016/S0014-3057(96)00174-7 ↗
16. Meier-Haack J, Vako M, Lunkwitz K, Bleha M (2004) Desalination 163:21510.1016/S0011-9164(04)90192-0 ↗
17. Araújo WD, Araújo EM, Melo TJA (2004) In: Proceedings of Americas Regional Meeting. Florianópolis, November 2004, p 1
18. Agrawal P, Araújo WD, Araújo EM, Mélo TJA (2005) In: Proceedings of XX Brazilian Society of Microanalysis and Microscopy Congress. Águas de Lindóia, August 2005, p 1
19. Karmierczak T, Krasnikova NP, Galeski A, Pracella M (2000) Macro Symp 149:18510.1002/1521-3900(200001)149:1<185::AID-MASY185>3.0.CO;2-P ↗