Electrodeposition of thin films and nanowires Ni–Fe alloys, study of their magnetic susceptibility
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrodeposition of thin films and nanowires Ni–Fe alloys is presented. For the thin films, we have studied the impact of various electrolytic conditions (magnetic induction, pH, and substrate) on the composition and magnetic susceptibility. Whatever the electrolytic conditions, the evolution of the composition versus the polarization exhibited first a decrease of the Ni content within the deposit followed by an increase. However, at constant polarization, the obtained values were different. Concerning the evolution of the magnetic susceptibility versus the composition, it is known that it decreases with the enhancement of the Ni percentage. The reason is that the susceptibility of iron is higher than that of Ni. It can also observe a sharp rupture in the evolution of magnetic susceptibility, which appeared near the Invar composition (Ni36Fe64). Our results show that the electrolytic conditions do not affect the position of the rupture point for the thin films but modify the susceptibility values. For the nanowires, a polycarbonate membrane has been used as a template. The structural characteristics of wires were examined using X-ray diffraction. According to the composition and as described in the literature for the electrodeposited thin films, a change between the body-centered cubic structure and face-centered cubic structure was obtained for the nanowires. However, for the nanowires this modification appeared for a lower Ni content than for this in thin films. Finally, a comparison of their magnetic susceptibility with thin films exhibited a shift toward the lower Ni contents for the rupture point.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Wiess RJ (1963) Proc Phys Soc 82:28110.1088/0370-1328/82/2/314 ↗
2. Kondorsky EI, Sedov VL (1960) J Appl Phys 31:331S10.1063/1.1984733 ↗
3. Crangle J, Hallam GG (1963) Proc R Soc Lond 272:11910.1098/rspa.1963.0045 ↗
4. Kouvel JS, Wilson RH (1961) J Appl Phys 32:43510.1063/1.1736020 ↗
5. Ueda Y, Takahashi M (1980) J Phys Soc Jpn 49:47710.1143/JPSJ.49.477 ↗
6. Brenner A (1963) Electrodeposition of alloys, vol 2. Academic Press Inc, New York
7. Matlosz M (1993) J Electrochem Soc 140:227210.1149/1.2220807 ↗
8. Zech N, Podlaha EJ, Landolt D (1999) J Electrochem Soc 146:288610.1149/1.1392024 ↗
9. Krause T, Arulnayagam L, Pritzker M (1997) J Electrochem Soc 144:96010.1149/1.1837514 ↗
10. Afshar A, Dolati AG, Ghorbani M (2003) Mater Chem Phys 77:35210.1016/S0254-0584(02)00017-2 ↗
11. Vaes J, Fransaer J, Celis JP (2000) J Electrochem Soc 147:371810.1149/1.1393963 ↗
12. Lachenwitzer A, Magnussen OM (2000) J Phys Chem B 104:742410.1021/jp000503r ↗
13. Andricacos PC, Arana C, Tabib J, Dukovic J, Romankiw LT (1989) J Electrochem Soc 136:133610.1149/1.2096917 ↗
14. Karthik R, Raja RJ, Ramasamy M, Sheela G, Madhu S, Kennedy S, Ramakishan Rao CH, Pushpavanam M (2003) Trans Inst Met Finish 81:6810.1080/00202967.2003.11871492 ↗
15. Grimmett DL, Schwartz M, Nobe K (1998) Plat Surf Finish 75:94
16. Ramachandran A, Tharamani CN, Mayanna SM (2001) Trans Inst Met Finish 79:19510.1080/00202967.2001.11871393 ↗
17. Ebrahimi F, Ahmed Z (2003) J Appl Electrochem 33:73310.1023/A:1025049802635 ↗
18. Msellak K, Chopart JP, Jbara O, Aaboubi O, Amblard J (2004) J Magn Magn Mater 281:29510.1016/j.jmmm.2004.04.118 ↗
19. Tabakovic I, Riemer S, Vas’Ko V, Sapozhnikov V, Kief M (2003) J Electrochem Soc 150:C63510.1149/1.1598964 ↗
20. Rousse C, Msellak K, Fricoteaux P, Merienne E, Chopart JP (2006) Magnetohydrodynamics 42:37110.22364/mhd.42.4.3 ↗
21. Fricoteaux P, Rousse C (2008) J Electroanal Chem 612:910.1016/j.jelechem.2007.08.022 ↗
22. Cheung C, Djuanda F, Erb U, Palumbo G (1995) Nanostruct Mater 5:51310.1016/0965-9773(95)00264-F ↗
23. Ebrahimi F, Li H (2003) Rev Adv Mater Sci 5:134
24. Li H, Ebrahimi F (2003) Mat Sci Eng A347:9310.1016/S0921-5093(02)00586-5 ↗
25. Li H, Ebrahimi F, Choo H, Liaw Peter K (2006) J Mater Sci 41:7636. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0856-310.1007/s10853-006-0856-3 ↗
26. Lewis DB, Lehmberg CE, Marshall GW (2001) Trans IMF 79:17510.1080/00202967.2001.11871390 ↗
27. Sellmyer DJ, Zheng M, Skomski R (2001) J Phys Condens Matter 13:R44310.1088/0953-8984/13/25/201 ↗
28. MCGary PD, Tan L, Zou J, Stadler BJH, Downey PR, Flatau AB (2006) J Appl Phys 99:08B31010.1063/1.2167332 ↗
29. Yun M, Myuna NV, Vasquez RP, Wang J, Monbouquette H (2003) Nanofabr Technol Proc SPIE 5220:3710.1117/12.507189 ↗
30. Blondel A, Meier JP, Doudin B, Ansermet JPh (1994) Appl Phys Lett 65:301910.1063/1.112495 ↗
31. Chou S, Wei M, Krauss PR, Fischer PB (1994) J Vac Sci Technol B12:369510.1116/1.587642 ↗
32. Fert A, Piraux L (1999) J Magn Magn Mater 200:33810.1016/S0304-8853(99)00375-3 ↗
33. Ozin GA (1992) Adv Mater 4:61210.1002/adma.19920041003 ↗
34. Martin CR (1994) Science 266:196110.1126/science.266.5193.1961 ↗
35. Sugawara A, Streblechenko D, McCartney M, Scheinfein MR (1998) IEEE Trans Magn 34:108110.1109/20.706363 ↗
36. Aravamudhan S, Singleton J, Goddard PA, Bhansali S (2009) J Phys D Appl Phys 42:11500810.1088/0022-3727/42/11/115008 ↗
37. Roy E, Fricoteaux P, Yu-Zang K (2001) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 1:110.1166/jnn.2001.042 ↗
38. Motoyama M, Fukunaka Y, Sakka T, Ogata YH, Kikuchi S (2005) J Electroanal Chem 584:8410.1016/j.jelechem.2005.07.023 ↗
39. Grimmett DL, Schwartz M, Nobe K (1990) J Electrochem Soc 11:341410.1149/1.2086231 ↗
40. Leith SD, Ramli S, Schwartz DT (1999) J Electrochem Soc 146:143110.1149/1.1391781 ↗