journal article·2007-05

Geopolymer matrices with improved hydrothermal corrosion resistance for high-temperature applications

B. G. Nair, Q. Zhao, R. F. Cooper

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Ceramic matrix composites have to overcome two major barriers for applications in aircraft and stationary turbines/engines. One is the unacceptably high processing cost to obtain sufficient mechanical properties and the other is their poor corrosion resistance under hydrothermal oxidizing conditions typical of engines and turbines. Functional geopolymer composites provide possible solutions to the above two problems since they can be formed by technologically simple processing routes and the hydrothermal corrosion resistance can be improved by tailoring material compositions. In this paper geopolymer matrix materials with superior hydrothermal corrosion resistance were processed from the selected geomimetic compositions. The effects of processing parameters, such as particle size, extent of dissolution, and firing temperature on the compressive strength and microstructures were examined and specimens with a compression strength as high as ∼99 MPa were fabricated. Hydrothermal test experiments on KOH-derived geopolymer specimens showed that all of potassium-bonded geopolymer specimens have minimal mass change or dimensional change during hydrothermal exposure in spite of the phase change.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Ohnabe H, Masaki S, Onuzuka M, Miyahara K, Sasa T (1999) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 30:48910.1016/S1359-835X(98)00139-0 ↗
2. Claussen N (1999) Br Ceram Trans 98:25610.1179/096797899680543 ↗
3. Spitsberg I, Steibel J (2004) Int J Appl Ceram Technol 1:29110.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00181.x ↗
4. Colomban P (1997) Mat Sci Forum 251–254:83310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.251-254.833 ↗
5. Davidovits J, Davidovics M (1991) In: 36th International SAMPE symposium, San Diego, p 1939
6. Davidovits J (1991) J Thermal Anal 37:163310.1007/BF01912193 ↗
7. Steveson M, Sagoe-Crentsil K (2005) J Mater Sci 40:202310.1007/s10853-005-1226-2 ↗
8. Xu H, van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2001) Ind Eng Chem Res 40:374910.1021/ie010042b ↗
9. Rahier H, Denayer JF, Van Mele B (2003) J Mater Sci 38:313110.1023/A:1024733431657 ↗
10. Barbosa VFF, MacKenzie KJD, Thaumaturgo C (2000) Int J Inorg Mater 2:30910.1016/S1466-6049(00)00041-6 ↗
11. van Jaarsveld JGS, van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2002) Chem Eng J 89:6310.1016/S1385-8947(02)00025-6 ↗
12. Bjorn Mysen O (1990) Phase diagrams for ceramists, 8, Fig. 07985-C, p 108