journal article·2006-11

Squeeze infiltration processing of nickel coated carbon fiber reinforced Al-2014 composite

Pradeep K. Rohatgi, Vindhya Tiwari, Nikhil Gupta

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 41· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

Ni-coated fibers are widely used to synthesize carbon fiber reinforces Al based composites. It is observed that during the pressure infiltration process, significant amount of damage takes place in the nickel (Ni) coating due to a difference in the thermal expansion coefficients of fibers and Ni-coating. A modified squeeze infiltration set up is studied in the present work to minimize the damage to the Ni-coating during the infiltration process. This process resulted in significant improvement in retention of the Ni-coating compared to the unmodified process. The solidification pattern in the matrix was established by Energy Dispersive Spectroscopic analysis, which suggests that solidification of primary α-Al started in the interfiber region. The Vickers hardness values for the unreinforced portion of the sample, the matrix regions within the fiber tows and at the fiber matrix interface were found to be 55, 72 and 87, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Clyne TW, Mason JF (1987) Metal Trans A 18A:151910.1007/BF02646664 ↗
2. Mortenson A, Cornie JA, Flemmings MC (1988) J Met 12–1910.1007/BF03258826 ↗
3. Yue M, Chadwick T (1996) J Mater Proc Technol 58:30210.1016/0924-0136(95)02148-5 ↗
4. Demir A, Altinkok N (2004) Compos Sci Technol 64(13–14):206710.1016/j.compscitech.2004.02.015 ↗
5. Lin RY (1995) Key Eng Mater 104–107:50710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.104-107.507 ↗
6. Degischer HP, Schulz P, Lacom W (1977) Key Eng Mater 127–131:99
7. Daoud A (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 391:114–12010.1016/j.msea.2004.08.075 ↗
8. Gupta M, Surappa MK (1995) Key Eng Mater 104–107:25910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.104-107.259 ↗
9. Rohatgi P, Asthana R, Das S (1986) Int Met Rev 31:11510.1179/imr.1986.31.1.115 ↗
10. Flemings MC (1990) In: Proc. Elliot Symposium (Iron and Steel Society). pp 216–235
11. Ghosh A (1990) Principles of secondary processing and casting of liquid steels, Chapter 6, 7, & 9. South Asia Books; New Delhi
12. Lacaze J, Lesoult G (1999) Iron Steel Inst Japan Intl 39:658
13. Flemings MC (1976) Solidification processing. McGraw Hill Publications, New York
14. Burton JA, Prim RC, Slichter WP (1953) J Chem Phys 21(11):1987–199610.1063/1.1698728 ↗
15. Ryu YM, Yoon EP, Rhee MH (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19(12):1103–10.1023/A:1006780212533 ↗
16. Mortensen A (2000) In: Kelly A, Zweben C (eds) Comprehensive composite materials, Metal matrix composites, vol 3. Elsevier Science, pp 521
17. Rohatgi PK, Narendranath CS, Ray S, Asthana R (1992) In: Rohatgi P (ed) Microstructure formation during solidification of metal matrix composites. TMS, p 1
18. Trespaille-Barran P, Suery M (1994) Mater Sci Technol 10(6):97
19. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf D, Makel DD, Sonergaard NA, Maribo DW (1988) In: Fishman SG, Dhingra AK (eds) Cast reinforced metal composite. ASM International, Materials Park, OH