journal article·2009-10

Electromigration behaviors in Sb particle-reinforced composite eutectic SnAgCu solder joints

Fu Guo, Guangchen Xu, Hongwen He

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Due to the limited capacity of solder joints in microprocessors for the higher current density (usually 103–104 A/cm2), electromigration (EM), known as the mass movement resulting from imposition of high current density, has gained extensive attention during the last decades, specifically, the EM-induced damages in the eutectic 95.5Sn–3.8Ag–0.9Cu (e-SAC) that were heavily used in the electronic packaging industry. In order to conquer the instable physical properties of e-SAC in the severe service environment, composite approach was developed. One of the promising ways was intentionally incorporated metal-particles reinforcements. In this study, the e-SAC with 1 wt% Sb particles additive was investigated under the current density of 104 A/cm2 and 120 °C the ambient temperature. Unlike the non-composite solders that had obvious formation of hillock and valley at the anode side and cathode side, respectively. The crack initiated at the edge of the cathode interface and propagated to the center in the Sb particle-reinforced composite solder. The Sn–Sb phase, formed near the cathode interface after the first-reflow, blocked the movement of metal atoms/ions, but then induced the current crowding. In addition, synergistic influence of the compressive and tensile stress caused the fracturing of the Sn–Sb phase in the solder matrix due to its brittleness and immobility.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Puttlitz KJ, Galyon GT (2007) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 18:33110.1007/s10854-006-9023-5 ↗
2. Guo F, Lucas JP, Subramanian KN (2001) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 12:2710.1023/A:1011264527894 ↗
3. Guo F, Lee J, Choi S, Lucas JP, Bieler TR, Subramania KN (2001) J Electron Mater 30:107310.1007/s11664-001-0132-x ↗
4. Hao H, Shi Y, Xia Z, Lei Y, Guo F (2008) J Electron Mater 37:210.1007/s11664-007-0263-9 ↗
5. Cheng F, Nishikawa H, Takemoto T (2008) J Mater Sci 43:3643. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2580-710.1007/s10853-008-2580-7 ↗
6. Lin YC, Zhong J (2008) J Mater Sci 43:3072. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2320-410.1007/s10853-007-2320-4 ↗
7. Wu BY, Chan YC, Zhong HW, Alam MO (2007) J Mater Sci 42:7415. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-1836-y10.1007/s10853-007-1836-y ↗
8. Nah JW, Suh JO, Tu KN, Yoon SW, Rao VS, Vaidyanathan K, Hua F (2006) J Appl Phys 100:1235131
9. Chen CM, Huang CC, Liao CN, Liou KM (2007) J Electron Mater 36:76010.1007/s11664-007-0150-4 ↗
10. Chen CM, Huang CC (2008) J Alloys Compd 461:23510.1016/j.jallcom.2007.07.059 ↗
11. He HW, Xu GC, Guo F (2009) J Mater Sci 44:2089. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3276-310.1007/s10853-009-3276-3 ↗
12. Xu GC, He HW, Guo F (2009) J Electron Mater 38:27310.1007/s11664-008-0562-9 ↗
13. Xu GC, He HW, Guo F (2009) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 20:27610.1007/s10854-008-9720-3 ↗
14. Lee HT, Lin HS, Lee CS, Chen PW (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 407:3610.1016/j.msea.2005.07.049 ↗
15. Ren F, Nah JW, Tu KN, Xiong BS, Xu LH, Pang J (2006) Appl Phys Lett 89:14191410.1063/1.2358113 ↗
16. Nah JW, Ren F, Paik KW, Tu KN (2006) J Mater Res 21:69810.1557/jmr.2006.0086 ↗
17. Chen C, Liang SW (2007) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 18:25910.1007/s10854-006-9020-8 ↗