journal article·2009-09

Fatigue damage of low amplitude cycles in low carbon steel

Herwig Mayer

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

The influences of low load cycles on fatigue damage in 0.15% C steel (C15E, No. 1.1141) are investigated in the very high cycle fatigue regime using ultrasonic fatigue testing equipment. Constant amplitude (CA) endurance limits at limiting lifetime of 109 cycles are determined in cyclic tension–compression and cyclic torsion tests. Non-propagating fatigue cracks are found in specimens subjected to cyclic torsion loading at the endurance limit. The endurance limit is considered as maximum stress amplitude where possibly initiated fatigue cracks do not propagate to failure. Two-step variable amplitude (VA) tension–compression endurance tests are performed with repeat sequences consisting of high stress amplitudes above the endurance limit and far greater number of cycles below. The measured lifetimes are compared with linear damage accumulation calculations (Miner calculations). If the high stress amplitude is more than approximately 13% above the CA endurance limit, detrimental influences of low load cycles and failures at low damage sums are found. If the high stress is less than 13% above the CA endurance limit, numerous low load cycles cause prolonged fatigue lifetimes and specimens can sustain large damage sums without failure. Two-step VA fatigue crack growth investigations show that load cycles below the threshold stress intensity accelerate crack growth, if the high stress intensity is 18% or more above the CA threshold stress intensity. In repeat sequences with high stress intensities 14% above threshold stress intensity, low load cycles decelerated and stopped fatigue crack growth. Low load cycles can reduce or prolong fatigue lifetimes of low carbon steel and one reason is the accelerated or retarded fatigue crack growth due to numerous low amplitudes, and the maximum load amplitude of a VA load sequence determines whether detrimental or beneficial effects prevail.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fire effects on concrete materials · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Mayer H, Stich A (2002) Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 25:88710.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00570.x ↗
2. Zettl B, Mayer H, Ede C, Stanzl-Tschegg S (2006) Int J Fatigue 28(11):158310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.016 ↗
3. De Los Rios ER, Mohamed HJ, Miller KJ (1985) Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 8(1):4910.1111/j.1460-2695.1985.tb00419.x ↗
4. Miller KJ, Mohamed HJ, De Los Rios ER (1986) In: Miller KJ, De Los Rios ER (eds) The behaviour of short fatigue cracks. Mechanical Engineering Publications, London
5. Yakushiji T, Kage M, Nishitani H (2001) JSME Int J 44(1):13810.1299/jsmea.44.138 ↗
6. Chapetti MD, Katsura N, Tagawa T, Miyata T (2001) Int J Fatigue 23:20710.1016/S0142-1123(00)00093-1 ↗
7. Heuler P, Seeger T (1986) Int J Fatigue 8(4):22510.1016/0142-1123(86)90025-3 ↗
8. Marquis G (1996) Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19(6):73910.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb01319.x ↗
9. Zheng X (2001) Int J Fatigue 23:75110.1016/S0142-1123(01)00040-8 ↗
10. Yan JH, Zheng XL, Zhao K (2001) Int J Fatigue 23:40310.1016/S0142-1123(01)00005-6 ↗
11. Palmgren A (1924) VDI-Zeitschr 68(14):339
12. Miner MA (1945) J Appl Mech Trans ASME 12:15910.1115/1.4009458 ↗
13. Berger C, Eulitz KG, Heuler P, Kotte KL, Naundorf H, Schütz W, Sonsino CM, Wimmer A, Zenner H (2002) Int J Fatigue 24:60310.1016/S0142-1123(01)00180-3 ↗
14. Haibach E (1970) In: Technische Mitteilungen, vol LBF TM No 50/70. Laboratorium für Betriebsfestigkeit, Darmstadt
15. Zenner H, Lui J (1992) Konstruktion 44:9
16. Pöting S, Zenner H (2002) Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 25:87710.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00569.x ↗
17. Murakami Y, Matsuda K (1999) In: Ravichandran KS, Ritchie RO, Murakami Y (eds) Small fatigue cracks. Elsevier Sci. Ltd., Amsterdam
18. Koterzawa R, Mudjijana Y, Quinsheng Y, Tian-Jian W, Nosho T (1994) Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 17(9):103310.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00832.x ↗
19. Miller KJ, Zachariah KP (1977) J Strain Anal 12(4):26210.1243/03093247V124262 ↗
20. Hashin Z, Rotem A (1978) Mater Sci Eng 34:14710.1016/0025-5416(78)90045-9 ↗
21. Manson SS, Halford GR (1981) Int J Fract 17(2):16910.1007/BF00053519 ↗
22. Ahmadi A, Zenner H (2005) Int J Fatigue 27:85310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.02.005 ↗
23. Mayer H (2006) Int J Fatigue 28(11):144610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.020 ↗
24. Mayer H (1999) Int Mater Rev 44(1):110.1179/imr.1999.44.1.1 ↗
25. Papadopoulos I, Davoli P, Gorla C, Filippini M, Bernasconi A (1997) Int J Fatigue 19(3):21910.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-3 ↗
26. Davoli P, Bernasconi A, Filippini M, Foletti S, Papadopoulos I (2003) Int J Fatigue 25:47110.1016/S0142-1123(02)00174-3 ↗
27. Billaudeau T, Nadot Y, Bezine G (2004) Acta Mater 52:391110.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.006 ↗
28. Morel F, Flaceliere L (2005) Int J Fatigue 27:108910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.009 ↗
29. Ninic D (2006) Int J Fatigue 28:10310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.04.014 ↗
30. Akiniwa Y, Stanzl-Tschegg S, Mayer H, Wakita M, Tanaka K (2008) Int J Fatigue 30:205710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.07.004 ↗
31. Mayer H, Ede C, Allison JE (2005) Int J Fatigue 27(2):12910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.004 ↗
32. James NM, De Los Rios ER (1996) Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19(4):41310.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00978.x ↗