journal article·2009-03

Investigation on thermo-stabilization effect and nonisothermal degradation kinetics of the new compound additives on polyoxymethylene

Jian Shi, Bo Jing, Xiaoxuan Zou, Hongjun Luo, Wenli Dai

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

An increase in the thermal stability of several new additives on polyoxymethylene (POM) was attempted via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (static state) and balance torque testing (dynamic state), which truly reflected the processing in practice. The thermal stability of POM was improved by adding some of additives actually, especially for the compound stabilizer with oxidized polyethylene wax (OPE), low molecular weight polyamide 6 (LMWPA6) and triphenyl phosphate (TPP) from the static and dynamic data. Furthermore, the kinetic parameters for compound stabilizers of POM degradation were calculated from thermogravimetry (TG) curves by Coats-Redfernd method. The results reveal that the degradation temperatures of POM can be obviously raised by compound stabilizers OPE/LMWPA6/TPP. The long-term thermo-stability test of POM shows that POM with stabilizing system above has no obvious decrease in impact strength after storage duration of 15 days in an oven at 140 °C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Hasegawa S, Takeshita H, Yoshii F et al (2000) Polymer 41:11110.1016/S0032-3861(99)00131-7 ↗
2. Hisakatsu H, Kohji T (2003) Polymer 44:697310.1016/j.polymer.2003.08.019 ↗
3. Showaib EA, Wyzgoski MG (2002) J Mater Sci 37:1895. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101497192254710.1023/A:1014971922547 ↗
4. Pearson AWN, Groves GW (1976) J Polym Sci: Polym Phys Ed 14:903
5. Lüftl S, Archodoulaki VM, Seidler S (2006) Polym Degrad Stab 91:46410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.029 ↗
6. Stohler FR, Berger K (1990) Angew Makromol Chem 176/177(3074):32310.1002/apmc.1990.051760125 ↗
7. Moulinié P, Paroli RM, Wang ZY, Delgado AH (1996) Polym Test 15:7510.1016/0142-9418(95)00025-9 ↗
8. Archodoulaki VM, Lüftl S, Seidler S (2008) Polym Test 27:23610.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.11.001 ↗
9. Alsup et al (1961) United States Patent no. 2, 993, 025
10. Johnson R W (1978) United States Patent no. 4, 098, 843
11. Hu YL, Ye L (2006) Polymer 47:264910.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.050 ↗
12. Wagman M E et al (1987) United States Patent no. 4, 640, 949
13. Hu YL, Zheng X, Ye L (2005) J Appl Polym Sci 97:238710.1002/app.21865 ↗
14. Li X, Qu MJ (2007) Plastic Manuf (Chinese) 1/2(150):77
15. Coats AW, Redfern JP (1964) Nature 201(4914):6810.1038/201068a0 ↗
16. Yu J (2001) Appl Eng Plast Chinese 29(4):28
17. Chang FC, Yang MY (1990) Polym Eng Sci 30:54310.1002/pen.760300907 ↗
18. Kumar G, Mahesh L, Neelakantan NR, Subramanisn N (1993) Polym Int 31:289
19. Lüftl S, Archodoulaki VM, Koch T, Seidler S (2008) J Vinyl Addit Technol 10:2110.1002/vnl.20141 ↗
20. Kern W (1967) Chemiker-Ztg/Chem Apparatur 91(8):255
21. Archodoulaki VM, Lüftl S, Seidler S (2004) Polym Degrad Stab 86(1):7510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.03.011 ↗
22. Youliang Hu, Lin Ye, Xiaowen Zhao (2006) Polymer 47:2656