Polypropylene/SiO2 nanocomposites filled with different nanosilicas: thermal and mechanical properties, morphology and interphase characterization
Source abstract
Abstract
Untreated and surface-treated SiO2 nanoparticles with different alkyl chain length (described as C0, 3C1, C8 and C16 according to the number of carbon atoms) on particle surface were used as fillers for isotactic polypropylene (iPP). The iPP/SiO2 composites containing 2.3 vol% of nanoparticles were prepared by melt blending and injection moulding. The dispersion quality of nanoparticles in matrix was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The crystallization behaviour of iPP was examined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The mechanical properties of all samples were characterized by tensile test, compact tension (CT) test and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA). The particle–matrix interphase behaviour was also examined and discussed. SEM images show that different silicas show different dispersion quality in matrix due to different hydrophobicity. The crystallinity and spherulite size of matrix are overall decreased in composites. The tensile properties of iPP/SiO2 composites show clear relationship with alkyl chain length on particle surface, i.e. increasing alkyl chain length leads to decreased tensile modulus but increased tensile yield strength and strain, indicating increased interfacial interactions with increased alkyl chain length. The 3C1-composite shows the highest fracture toughness with an improvement by 9% compared to neat iPP, whereas the other composites show decreased values of fracture toughness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Streller RC, Thomann R, Torno O, Mülhaupt R (2008) Macromol Mater Eng 293:21810.1002/mame.200700354 ↗
2. Mittal V (2007) J Thermoplast Compos Mater 20:57510.1177/0892705707083636 ↗
3. Yuan Q, Wu DY, Gotama J, Bateman S (2008) J Thermoplast Compos Mater 21:19510.1177/0892705708089472 ↗
4. Liu XH, Wu QJ (2001) Polymer 42:1001310.1016/S0032-3861(01)00561-4 ↗
5. Nejad SJ, Ahmadi SJ, Abolghasemi H, Mohaddespour A (2007) J Appl Sci 7:248010.3923/jas.2007.2480.2484 ↗
6. Vu-Khanh T, Fisa B (1986) Polym Compos 7:37510.1002/pc.750070515 ↗
7. Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Zheng YX, Zeng HM, Freidrich K (2001) Polymer 42:330110.1016/S0032-3861(00)00741-2 ↗
8. Pustak A, Smit I, Svab I, Musil V (2007) Proceedings of conference microscopy-advanced tools for tomorrow’s materials, Berlin
9. Garcia M, Van Vliet G, Jain S, Schrauwen BAG, Sarkissov A, Van Zyl WE, Boukamp B (2004) Rev Adv Mater Sci 6:169
10. Huang L, Zhan RB, Lu YF (2009) J Reinf Plast Compos 25:100110.1177/0731684406065131 ↗
11. Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Zheng YX, Zeng HM, Walter R, Friedrich K (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19:115910.1023/A:1006711326705 ↗
12. Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Zheng YX, Zeng HM, Walter R, Friedrich K (2001) Polymer 42:16710.1016/S0032-3861(00)00325-6 ↗
13. Jancar J, Dibenedetto AT, Dianselmo A (1999) Polym Eng Sci 33:55910.1002/pen.760330908 ↗
14. Pukanszky B, Turcsanyi B, Tudos F (1988) In: Ishida H (ed) Interfaces in polymer. Elsevier, New York, p 467
15. Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Pan SL, Lehmann B, Friedrich K (2004) Polym Int 53:17610.1002/pi.1307 ↗
16. Sumita M, Tsukihi H, Miyasaka K, Ishikawa K (1984) J Appl Polym Sci 29:152310.1002/app.1984.070290506 ↗
17. Oelmüller R, Müller A, Meier K(1997) in Teilhydrophobe Fällungskieselsäuren, identification: DE19713316A1, Degussa AG, Germany
18. Bagwe RP, Hilliard LR, Tan WH (2006) Langmuir 22:435710.1021/la052797j ↗
19. Osman MA, Atallah A (2007) Macromol Chem Phys 208:8710.1002/macp.200600435 ↗
20. Paul SA, Sinturel C, Joseph K, Gem Mathew GD, Pothan LA, Thomas S (2010) Polym Eng Sci 50:38410.1002/pen.21522 ↗
21. Ciprari D, Jacob K, Tannenbaum R (2006) Macromolecules 39:656510.1021/ma0602270 ↗
22. Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Pan SL, Friedrich K (2004) J Polym Appl Sci 92:177110.1002/app.20139 ↗
23. Zhou JP, Qiu KQ, Fu LW (2005) J Compos Mater 39:193110.1177/0021998305051809 ↗
24. Arencon D, Velasco JI (2009) Materials 2:204610.3390/ma2042046 ↗
25. Pukánszky B, Vanes M, Maurer FHJ, Vörós G (1994) J Mater Sci 29:2350. doi: 10.1007/BF0036342610.1007/BF00363426 ↗
26. Zhuk AV, Knunyants NN, Oshmyan VG, Topolkaraev VA, Berlin AA (1993) J Mater Sci 28:4595. doi: 10.1007/BF0041424710.1007/BF00414247 ↗
27. Zhang H, Zhong Z, Yang JL, Friedrich K (2006) Polymer 47:67910.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.084 ↗
28. Yu JH, Wang GQ, Chen JF, Zeng XF, Wang WY (2007) Polym Eng Sci 47:20110.1002/pen.20480 ↗
29. Zhou RJ, Burkhart T (2010) J Thermoplast Compos Mater 23:48710.1177/0892705709353720 ↗
30. Way JL, Atkinson JR, Nutting J (1974) J Mater Sci 9:293. doi: 10.1007/BF0055095410.1007/BF00550954 ↗
31. Friedrich K (1983) Adv Polym Sci 52/53:22510.1007/BFb0024059 ↗
32. Ouederni M, Philips PJ (1996) J Eng Appl Sci 2:2312
33. Razavi-Nouri M, Ghorbanzadeh-Ahangari M, Fereidoon A, Jahanshahi M (2009) Polym Test 28:4610.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.10.001 ↗