Quantification of dislocations in hemp fibers using acid hydrolysis and fiber segment length distributions
Source abstract
Abstract
Natural fibers such as flax or hemp may be used in composite materials. However, their use for this purpose is hampered by the large natural variation in tensile strength and other quality parameters. The first step in managing these variations is to develop methods for fast and reliable determination of relevant parameters. One quality parameter of the fibers is the amount of structural distortions known as dislocations or kink bands. Here, a method developed for the quantification of dislocations in pulp fibers was adapted and tested successfully for hemp yarn segments. The method is based on acid hydrolysis and subsequent determination of the fiber segment length distribution. The premise of the method is that acid hydrolysis causes fibers to break in the dislocations rather than in other places. By use of polarized light microscopy and image analysis it was found that the premise was correct, and furthermore results showed that fibers broke more often in large dislocations than in small ones. However, it was also found that the hemp fiber segments did not break in all dislocations, and strict standardization of the procedure for acid hydrolysis is therefore necessary if results from different batches of fibers are to be compared.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Nyholm K, Ander P, Bardage S, Daniel G (2001) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 4:374
2. Terziev N, Daniel G, Marklund A (2005) Holzforschung 59:16310.1515/HF.2005.025 ↗
3. Davies GC, Bruce DM (1998) Tex Res J 68:62310.1177/004051759806800901 ↗
4. Hughes M, Sèbe G, Hague J, Hill C, Spear M, Mott L (2000) Compos Interface 7:1310.1163/156855400300183551 ↗
5. Bos HL, Van Den Oever MJA, Peters OCJJ (2002) J Mater Sci 37:1683. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101492562125210.1023/A:1014925621252 ↗
6. Lamy B, Pomel C (2002) J Mater Sci Lett 21:121110.1023/A:1016524619867 ↗
7. Baley C (2004) J Mater Sci 39:331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007768.63055.ae10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007768.63055.ae ↗
8. Thygesen LG, Eder M, Burgert I (2007) J Mater Sci 42:558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1113-510.1007/s10853-006-1113-5 ↗
9. Ander P, Marklund A, WURC report no. 4 (2003) ISBN 91-576-6647-4, available from P. Ander, Department of Wood Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7008, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
10. Ander P, Daniel G (2004) In: Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Gindl M, Sinn G (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on wood machining, Vienna, July 2004, BOKU, Vienna, p 247
11. Ander P, Daniel G (2004) In: Proceedings of the 8th European workshop on lignocellulosis and pulp, Riga, August 2004, Latvian Institute of Wood Chemistry, p 49
12. Ander P, Daniel G (2004) In: Schmitt U, Ander P, Barnett J, Emons AM, Jeronimidis G, Saranpää P, Tschegg S (eds) Wood fiber cell walls: methods to study their formation, structure and properties, SLU, Uppsala, p 203
13. Ander P, Daniel G, Garcia-Lindgren C, Marklund A (2005) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 20:8410.3183/npprj-2005-20-01-p115-121 ↗
14. Karlsson H, Franson P-I, Mohlin U-B (1999) In: Proceedings from the 6th International conference on new available technologies, Stockholm, 1999, SPCI, Stockholm, p 367
15. Thygesen LG, Ander P (2005) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 20:6410.3183/npprj-2005-20-01-p064-071 ↗