journal article·2014-01

High strain recovery with improved mechanical properties of gelatin–silica aerogel composites post-binding treatment

Mahesh Sachithanadam, Sunil C. Joshi

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 49· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Silica aerogels are very light and highly porous materials that are intriguingly and complexly networked with large internal surface area, high hydrophobicity with extremely low density and thermal conductivity. These features make them ideal choice for applications as thermal and acoustics insulators or as optical, electrical, and energy storing devices. However, their exploitation for structural applications is primarily inhibited by their brittleness. The brittleness of the silica aerogels makes their processing and handling difficult. Volumetric shrinkage occurs, which becomes more apparent at elevated temperatures. While there are hybrid silica aerogels doped with materials such as polymer, ceramics, metals in the market, the improvements in the mechanical properties are compromised with tremendous increase in density and reduction in the insulation performance. Post-synthesis binding treatment of silica aerogels composites are not extensively explored due to the chemically inert trimethylsilyl (TMS) terminal groups on the surface of the hydrophobic silica aerogels. This paper discusses a unique fabrication method of developing a ductile silica aerogel composite solid via post-synthesis binding treatment. Gelatin–silica aerogel (GSA) and GSA–sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) composite blocks were produced by mixing hydrophobic aerogel granulates in a gelatin–SDS foamed solution by frothing method. The entire fabrication process and grounds for using a controlled % of gelatin as the main binder and SDS as an additive are explained. The compression testing of the blocks is presented. The associated strain recovery—an unusual phenomenon with brittle silica aerogels, observed upon unloading is highlighted and studied. The microstructure and surface characterization of these composites was examined via FESEM/EDX and XPS/ESCA, respectively. The dependency of process variables involved were analyzed through analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. Empirical models that relate the composition of gelatin, aerogel, and SDS to achieve the optimal strain recovery with the associated compressive modulus and strength and density are established. The transition from brittleness to ductility is measured in terms of compressive stress versus strain behavior for various mass fractions of gelatin and SDS. The test data presented indicate analogous behavior of these to creep-like behavior of a material typically identified as the primary, secondary, and tertiary stages. The rationale and mechanisms behind such creep-like three stages are explained using schematic diagrams.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Gesser HD, Goswami PC (1989) Chem Rev 89(4):765. doi: 10.1021/Cr00094a00310.1021/cr00094a003 ↗
2. Hunt AJ, Jantzen CA, Cao W (1991) Insulation materials: testing and applications. ASTM, Gatlinburg, p 455 ASTM Special Technical Publication10.1520/STP16363S ↗
3. Lee K-H, Kim S-Y, Yoo K-P (1995) J Non-Cryst Solids 186:18. doi: 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00066-610.1016/0022-3093(95)00066-6 ↗
4. Lee CJ, Kim GS, Hyun SH (2002) J Mater Sci 37(11):2237. doi: 10.1023/a:101530901454610.1023/A:1015309014546 ↗
5. Rao AP, Pajonk GM, Rao AV (2005) J Mater Sci 40(13):3481. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-2853-310.1007/s10853-005-2853-3 ↗
6. Bhagat SD, Kim Y-H, Ahn Y-S, Yeo J-G (2007) Appl Surf Sci 253(6):3231. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.01610.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.016 ↗
7. Soleimani Dorcheh A, Abbasi MH (2008) J Mater Process Technol 199(1–3):10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.06010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.060 ↗
8. Alnaief M, Smirnova I (2011) J Supercrit Fluids 55(3):1118. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2010.10.00610.1016/j.supflu.2010.10.006 ↗
9. Bhagat SD, Kim Y-H, Moon M-J, Ahn Y-S, Yeo J-G (2007) Solid State Sci 9(7):628. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2007.04.02010.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2007.04.020 ↗
10. Parmenter KE, Milstein F (1998) J Non-Cryst Solids 223(3):179. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3093(97)00430-410.1016/S0022-3093(97)00430-4 ↗
11. Scherer GW, Smith DM, Qiu X, Anderson JM (1995) J Non-Cryst Solids 186:316. doi: 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00074-710.1016/0022-3093(95)00074-7 ↗
12. Moner-Girona M, Roig A, Molins E, Martinez E, Esteve J (1999) Appl Phys Lett 75(5):653. doi: 10.1063/1.12447110.1063/1.124471 ↗
13. Meador MAB, Fabrizio EF, Ilhan F, Dass A, Zhang G, Vassilaras P, Johnston JC, Leventis N (2005) Chem Mater 17(5):1085. doi: 10.1021/cm048063u10.1021/cm048063u ↗
14. Meador MAB, Weber AS, Hindi A, Naumenko M, McCorkle L, Quade D, Vivod SL, Gould GL, White S, Deshpande K (2009) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1(4):894. doi: 10.1021/am900014z10.1021/am900014z ↗
15. Katti A, Shimpi N, Roy S, Lu H, Fabrizio EF, Dass A, Capadona LA, Leventis N (2006) Chem Mater 18(2):285. doi: 10.1021/cm051384110.1021/cm0513841 ↗
16. Xu Z, Gan L, Jia Y, Hao Z, Liu M, Chen L (2007) J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 41(3):203. doi: 10.1007/s10971-006-1500-z10.1007/s10971-006-1500-z ↗
17. Ge DT, Yang LL, Li Y, Zhao JP (2009) J Non-Cryst Solids 355(52–54):2610. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.09.017
18. Gupta N, Ricci W (2008) J Mater Process Technol 198(1–3):178. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.08410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.084 ↗
19. Veronica V, Adrian T (2010) Water and life. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 235. doi: 10.1201/EBK1439803561-c16
20. Schweitzer PA (2006) Corrosion of polymers and elastomers. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 147. doi: 10.1201/9780849382468.ch310.1201/9780849382468.ch3 ↗
21. Chanda M, Roy SK (2008) Industrial polymers, specialty polymers, and their applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 1. doi: 10.1201/9781420080599.ch110.1201/9781420080599 ↗
22. Boris D, Anatoliy Z, Elena Y (2001) Smart Polymers. CRC Press, London. doi: 10.1201/NOE0415267984.ch10
23. Gary C, Mikhail F, Parminder S (2008) Technology of pressure-sensitive adhesives and products. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 71. doi: 10.1201/9781420059410.ch7
24. Frydrych M, Wan C, Stengler R, O’Kelly KU, Chen B (2011) J Mater Chem 21(25):9103. doi: 10.1039/C1jm10788g10.1039/c1jm10788g ↗
25. Aristippos G (2002) Protein-based films and coatings. CRC Press, Boca Raton. doi: 10.1201/9781420031980.ch16
26. Fidler C, Simonton TC (1996) Aerogel-in-foam thermal insulation and its preparation. US Patent, 5569513, 29 Oct 1996
27. Fidler C, Simonton TC (1996) Aerogel-in-foam thermal insulation and its preparation. US Patent, 6136216, 24 Oct 2000
28. Mo X, Sun X (2000) J Polym Environ 8(4):161. doi: 10.1023/a:101524160949710.1023/A:1015241609497 ↗
29. Ruiz CC, Díaz-López L, Aguiar J (2008) J Dispers Sci Technol 29(2):266. doi: 10.1080/0193269070170757110.1080/01932690701707571 ↗
30. Guo J, Nguyen BN, Li L, Meador MAB, Scheiman DA, Cakmak M (2013) J Mater Chem A 1(24):7211. doi: 10.1039/C3TA00439B10.1039/c3ta00439b ↗
31. Zhong Y-H, Zhou B, Gui J-Y, Li Y-N, Du A, Shen J, Wu G-M, Zhang Z-H (2011) At Energy Sci Technol 45(10):1170
32. Rao AV, Kulkarni MM, Pajonk GM, Amalnerkar DP, Seth T (2003) J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 27(2):103. doi: 10.1023/a:102376503098310.1023/A:1023765030983 ↗
33. Ashby MF, Gibson LJ (1997) Cellular solids-structure and properties. 2nd edn. Cambridge university Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
34. Moulder JF, Chastain J, King RC (1995) In: Chastain J, King RC Jr (eds) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a reference book of standard spectra for identification and interpretation of XPS data. Physical Electronics, Eden Prairie, MN
35. Wang S-J, Jin I-S, Park H-H (1998) Surf Coat Technol 100–101:59. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00588-410.1016/S0257-8972(97)00588-4 ↗
36. Yang H-S, Choi S-Y, Hyun S-H, Park C-G (1999) Thin Solid Films 348(1–2):69. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00016-410.1016/S0040-6090(99)00016-4 ↗
37. Jo M-H, Hong J-K, Park H–H, Kim J–J, Hyun S-H, Choi S-Y (1997) Thin Solid Films 308–309:490. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00437-910.1016/S0040-6090(97)00437-9 ↗
38. Mazur JH (1984) High resolution electron microscopy study of silica aerogel transparent insulation. In: Proceedings of SPIE vol 50210.1117/12.944795 ↗
39. Woignier T, Phalippou J, Vacher R (1989) J Mater Res 4(03):688. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1989.068810.1557/JMR.1989.0688 ↗