journal article·2006-08-29

Microspheres as building blocks for hydroxyapatite/polylactide biodegradable composites

J. Russias, E. Saiz, R. K. Nalla, A. P. Tomsia

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 41· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

A new generation of organic/inorganic composites is offering a promising approach for creating biocompatible and biodegradable materials with mechanical properties that match that of human bone better than traditional metallic implants. Here, we report a novel technique whereby hydroxyapatite powder is encapsulated in polylactide-based microspheres, processed by an emulsion-solvent evaporation method, and then used as the building blocks to produce dense, microstructurally-uniform composites through a hot pressing route. The mechanical properties of these composites––both ab initio and after in vitro degradation in a simulated environment- were subsequently characterized. Although despite in vitro degradation remains an issue, the Young’s modulus, bending strength and fracture resistance were higher than the corresponding minimum values for human cortical bone. These results suggest that the hot-pressing of hydroxyapatite/polylactide microspheres can be a viable route for the synthesis of load-bearing bone-replacement materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC (1988) J Clin Invest 81:180410.1172/JCI113523 ↗
2. Jennings AG, de Boer P (1999) Injury 30:16910.1016/S0020-1383(98)00249-6 ↗
3. Hall MJ, Owings MF (2000) National Hospital Discharge Survey. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, Vol. 329, 2002. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland
4. Biomaterials, Medical Implant Science: Present and Future Perspectives. A National Institutes of Health Workshop, October 16–17, 1995, Summary Report
5. NIH Technology Assessment Conference on Improving Medical Implants Performance through Retrieval Information: Challenges, Opportunities January 10–12, 2000
6. Biomimetics, Tissue Engineering, Biomaterials, National Institute of Dental Research Workshop, September 24–26, (1996)
7. Frontiers of Engineering (1999) National Academic Press, Washington DC
8. Brunski JB (1992) Clin Mater 10:15310.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-Y ↗
9. Black J (1999) Biological performance of materials fundamentals of biocompatibility, 3rd ed. Marcel Dekker. Xii, New York, p 463
10. Heimann RB (2002) CMU Journal 1:23
11. Rho J-Y, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P (1998) Med Eng Phys 20:9210.1016/S1350-4533(98)00007-1 ↗
12. Hench L.L (1991) J Am Ceram Soc 74:148710.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
13. Ambrose CG, Clanton TO (2004) Ann Biomed Eng 32:17110.1023/B:ABME.0000007802.59936.fc ↗
14. Kasuga T, Maeda H, Kato K, Nogami M, Hata K, Ueda M (2003) Biomaterials 24:324710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00190-X ↗
15. Ignjatovic N, Uskokovic D (2004) Appl Surf Sci 238:31410.1016/j.apsusc.2004.05.227 ↗
16. Ignjatovic N, Tomic S, Dakic M, Mijkovic M, Plavsic M, Uskokovic D (1999) Biomaterials 20:80910.1016/S0142-9612(98)00234-8 ↗
17. Zhang R, Ma PX (1999) Poly(alpha-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite porous composites for bone-tissue engineering. I. Preparation and morphology. J Biomed Mater Res 44:446–45510.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990315)44:4<446::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
18. Furukawa T, Matsusue Y, Yasunaga T, Shikinami Y, Okuna M, Nakamura T (2000) Biomaterials 21:88910.1016/S0142-9612(99)00232-X ↗
19. Kasuga T, Ota Y, Nogami M, Abe Y (2001) Biomaterials 22:1910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00091-0 ↗
20. Hile DD, Doherty SA, Trantolo DJ (2004) J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 71B:20110.1002/jbm.b.30091 ↗
21. McManus AJ, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R (2004) Evaluation of cytocompatibility and bending modulus of nanoceramic/polymer composites. J Biomed Mater Res 72A10.1002/jbm.a.30204 ↗
22. Russias J, Saiz E, Nalla RK, Gryn K, Ritchie RO, Tomsia AP (2005) Fabrication and mechanical properties of PLA/HA composites: a study of in vitro degradation. Mater Sci Eng: C Available online October 6, 2005
23. Tas AC (2001) J Am Ceram Soc 84:29510.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00653.x ↗
24. Van Wezel AL (1967) Nature 216:6410.1038/216064a0 ↗
25. Qiu Q-Q, Ducheyne P, Ayyaswamy PS (2000) J Biomed Mater Res 52:6610.1002/1097-4636(200010)52:1<66::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
26. Mathiowitz E, Saltzman WM, Domb A, Dor P, Langer R (1988) J Appl Polymer Sci 35:75510.1002/app.1988.070350316 ↗
27. Couvreur P, Puisieux F (1993) Adv Drug Delivery Rev 10:14110.1016/0169-409X(93)90046-7 ↗
28. O’Donnell P, McGinity JW (1997) Adv Drug Delivery Rev 28:57
29. Kinney JH, Nichols MC (1992) Annu Rev of Mater Sci 22:12110.1146/annurev.ms.22.080192.001005 ↗
30. Strojny A, Xia X, Tsou A, Gerberich WW (1998) J Adhes Sci Technol 12:129910.1163/156856198X00452 ↗
31. Sneddon IN (1965) Int J Eng Sci 3:4710.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
32. Pharr GM, Oliver WC, Brotzen FR (1992) J Mater Res 7:61310.1557/JMR.1992.0613 ↗
33. ASTM E399–90 (Reapproved 1997) In: Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 03.01: Metals-Mechanical Testing; Elevated and Low-temperature Tests; Metallography. 2002, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA
34. Currey JD (1998) Proc Instn Mech Engrs 212H:39910.1243/0954411981534178 ↗
35. Qing-Qing Qiu PD, Portonovo S (2000) J Biomed Mater Res 52:6610.1002/1097-4636(200010)52:1<66::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
36. Hench L.L. (1991) J Am Ceram Soc74:148710.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
37. Tsuji H, Miyauchi S (2001) Biomacromolecules 2:59710.1021/bm010048k ↗