Solid–liquid structural break-up in M2 tool steel for semi-solid metal processing
Source abstract
Abstract
The success of semi-solid metal processing mostly depends on the formation of suitable starting microstructure, which must consist of solid metal spheroids in a liquid matrix. Various methods of obtaining this structure have been established; they include recrystallisation and partial melting (RAP), strain-induced melt-activated (SIMA), or simple mechanical stirring, to name a few. These methods, as widely discussed, have mostly been applied with light alloys, mainly aluminium based. This article discusses solid–liquid structural break-up in M2 tool steel subjected to a direct re-melting procedure from the as-annealed condition. The role of carbide dissolution in the grain boundary liquation of the steel is described. This leads to the production of near spheroidal solid grains in a liquid matrix, a microstructure suitable for the thixoforming process. Microstructural examination revealed that carbide particles contained in bands at 1220 °C slowly disappeared with temperature. At 1300 °C, the solid grains seemed to be free from carbides. Most of the carbides had now re-precipitated at the grain boundaries. Thixoforming carried out at 1340 and 1360 °C revealed the thixotropic properties of the semi-solid metal slurries. The results indicate a widening of the range of potential routes to thixoformable microstructures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Spencer DB, Mehrabian R, Flemings MC (1972) Metall Mater Trans 3A:192510.1007/BF02642580 ↗
2. Flemings MC (1991) Metall Trans A 22A:95710.1007/BF02661090 ↗
3. Kirkwood DH (1994) Int Mater Rev 39(5):17310.1179/imr.1994.39.5.173 ↗
4. Fan Z (2002) Int Mater Rev 47(2):4910.1179/095066001225001076 ↗
5. Legoretta EC, Atkinson HV, Jones H (2008) J Mater Sci 43:5456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2829-110.1007/s10853-008-2829-1 ↗
6. Nohn B, Morjan U, Hartmann D (2000) In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on semi-solid processing of alloys and composites, Turin, Italy. Edimet Spa, Brescia, pp 265–272
7. Omar MZ, Atkinson HV, Palmiere EJ, Howe AA, Kapranos P (2004) Steel Res Int 75(8/9):55210.1002/srin.200405810 ↗
8. Omar MZ, Palmiere EJ, Howe AA, Atkinson HV, Kapranos P (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 395:5310.1016/j.msea.2004.12.013 ↗
9. Puttgen W, Bleck W, Hirt G, Shimahara H (2007) Adv Eng Mater 9(4):23110.1002/adem.200700006 ↗
10. Kapranos P, Kirkwood DH, Sellars CM (1993) J Phys IV Colloque C7, Suppl J Phys III 3:835
11. Kapranos P, Kirkwood DH, Sellars CM (1996) In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on semi-solid processing of alloys and composites, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, pp 306–311
12. Kapranos P, Ward PJ, Atkinson HV, Kirkwood DH (2000) Mater Des 21:38710.1016/S0261-3069(99)00077-1 ↗
13. American Society for Testing and Materials (1996) ASTM E 112-96
14. American Society for Testing and Materials (1999) ASTM E 562-99
15. Roberts GA, Hamaker JC Jr, Johnson AR (1971) Tool steels, 3rd edn. American Society for Metals, Metals Park
16. Omar MZ, Palmiere EJ, Howe AA, Atkinson HV, Kapranos P (2004) In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on semi-solid processing of alloys and composites, Limassol, Cyprus. North American Die Casting Association, Wheeling
17. Honeycombe RWK, Bhadeshia HKDH (1995) Steels: microstructure and properties. Edward Arnold, UK
18. Meuser H, Bleck W (2001) Steel Res Int 72(7):27110.1002/srin.200100116 ↗
19. Meuser H, Bleck W (2002) In: 7th International conference on semisolid processing of alloys and composites, Tsukuba, Japan, pp 349–35410.1049/cp:20020306 ↗
20. Dienes GJ, Klemm HF (1946) J Appl Phys 17:45810.1063/1.1707739 ↗