Impact of heat treatment on the mechanical properties of AISI 304L austenitic stainless steel in high-pressure hydrogen gas
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogen environment embrittlement of metastable austenitic stainless steels is a well-known phenomenon partially related to the formation of strain-induced martensite. In the literature, hydrogen environment embrittlement is often discussed on the basis of nominal chemical compositions only and neglects effects of metallurgical production and processing. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the δ-ferrite volume fraction and grain size on the mechanical properties of a standard grade 1.4307 (AISI 304L) tested in high-pressure hydrogen gas. A negligible influence was found for δ-ferrite volume fractions between 2 and 10 %. This result is explained by the dominating influence of machining-induced α-martensite on the surface of the tensile samples. In contrast, the grain size was found to have a significant effect on hydrogen environment embrittlement. In particular, grain sizes smaller than 50 μm were found to have a higher ductility. The results are discussed with respect to stacking fault energy, formation of strain-induced α-martensite, trapping of hydrogen and microsegregations. The results are of particular interest for the materials selection and development of materials for hydrogen applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Brooks JA, West AJ (1981) Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 12(2):21310.1007/BF02655194 ↗
2. Borchers C, Michler T, Pundt A (2008) Adv Eng Mater 10(1–2):1110.1002/adem.200700252 ↗
3. Marchi CS, Somerday BP, Robinson SL (2007) Int J Hydrogen Energy 32(1):10010.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.05.008 ↗
4. Michler T, Lee Y, Gangloff RP, Naumann J (2009) Int J Hydrogen Energy 34(7):320110.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.015 ↗
5. Perng TP, Altstetter CJ (1986) Acta Metall 34(9):177110.1016/0001-6160(86)90123-9 ↗
6. Perng TP, Altstetter CJ (1987) Metall Mater Trans A-Phys Metall Mater Sci 18(1):12310.1007/BF02646229 ↗
7. Kundu A, Chakraborti PC (2010) J Mater Sci 45:5482. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4605-210.1007/s10853-010-4605-2 ↗
8. Kumar BR, Das SK, Mahato B, Ghosh RN (2010) J Mater Sci 45:911. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4020-810.1007/s10853-009-4020-8 ↗
9. Rozenak P, Eliezer D (1983) Mater Sci Eng 61:3110.1016/0025-5416(83)90123-4 ↗
10. Huang F, Li XG, Liu J, Qu YM, Jia J, Du CW (2011) J Mater Sci 46:715. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4799-310.1007/s10853-010-4799-3 ↗
11. Talonen J, Aspegren P, Hanninen H (2004) Mater Sci Technol 20(12):150610.1179/026708304X4367 ↗
12. Zhang L, Wen M, Imade M, Fukuyama S, Yokogawa K (2008) Acta Mater 56(14):341410.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.022 ↗
13. G142-98(2004) (2004) In: Standard test method for determination of susceptibility of metals to embrittlement in hydrogen containing environments at high pressure, high temperature, or both. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/G0142-98R0410.1520/G0142-98R04 ↗
14. Louthan MR, Caskey GR, Donovan JA, Rawl DE (1972) Mater Sci Eng 10(6):357–36810.1016/0025-5416(72)90109-7 ↗
15. Han G, He J, Fukuyama S (1998) Acta Mater 46(13):455910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00136-0 ↗
16. Thermo-Calc Software AB (2010) In: Thermo-calc user’s guide version S, Foundation of Computational Thermodynamics, Stockholm
17. Sundmann B, Shi P, Bratberg J (2008) In: TCFE6: TCS steels/Fe-alloys database version 6 (Juni 2008), Thermo-Calc Software AB, Stockholm
18. Martin M, Weber S, Izawa C, Wagner S, Pundt A, Theisen W (2011) Int J Hydrogen Energy 36(17):1119510.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.133 ↗
19. Olson G, Cohen M (1976) Metall Mater Trans A 7(11): 189710.1007/BF02654987 ↗
20. Olson GB, Cohen M (1981) Annu Rev Mater Sci 11:110.1146/annurev.ms.11.080181.000245 ↗
21. Tyson W (1984) Metall Trans A-Phys Metall Mater Sci 15(7):147510.1007/BF02648577 ↗
22. Buckley JR, Hardie D (1993) Corros Sci 34(1):9310.1016/0010-938X(93)90261-E ↗
23. Mine Y, Tachibana K, Horita Z (2011) Mater Sci Eng: A 528(28):810010.1016/j.msea.2011.07.031 ↗
24. Mine Y, Horita Z, Murakami Y (2010) Acta Mater 58:64910.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.043 ↗
25. Jun JH, Choi CS (1998) Mater Sci Eng A—Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Proc 257(2):35310.1016/S0921-5093(98)00994-0 ↗
26. Varma SK, Kalyanam J, Murr Le, Srinivas V (1994) J Mater Sci Lett 13:10710.1007/BF00416816 ↗
27. Nohara K, Ono Y, Ohashi N (1977) ISIJ Int 63(5):212
28. Ulvan E, Kousaris A (1988) Metall Trans A-Phys Metall Mater Sci 19(9):228710.1007/BF02645052 ↗
29. Borchers C, Michler T, Pundt A (2008) Adv Eng Mater 10:1110.1002/adem.200700252 ↗
30. Grabke HJ (1968) Ber Bunsenges phys Chem 72: 541. doi: 10.1002/bbpc.1968072041010.1002/bbpc.19680720410 ↗
31. Barthelemy H (2011) Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:275010.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.029 ↗
32. Weber S, Martin M, Theisen W (2010) HTM J Heat Treatm Mat 65(4):S. 23010.3139/105.110062 ↗
33. Weber S, Martin M, Theisen W (2011) Mater Sci Eng: A 528(25–26):768810.1016/j.msea.2011.06.049 ↗