The variation in lateral and longitudinal stress gauge response within an RTM 6 epoxy resin under one-dimensional shock loading
Source abstract
Abstract
The dynamic response of a commercially important epoxy resin (RTM 6) has been studied using plate impact experiments in the impact velocity regime of 80–960 m/s. Both longitudinal and lateral manganin stress gauges were employed to study the development of orthogonal components of stress both during and after shock arrival. In light of recent work raising doubts about the interpretation of lateral gauge data, lateral response within the RTM 6 resin was also used to investigate the physical phenomena being measured by the embedded lateral gauges. US–uP and σX–uP Hugoniot relationships were in good agreement with data for similar polymer materials from the literature. Derivation of shear strength behaviour both during and after shock arrival showed evidence of strengthening behind the shock front, attributed to compression of the cross-linked epoxy resin polymer chains. Comparison of the change in lateral stress behind the shock to the behaviour of an epoxy resin possessing a similar US–uP Hugoniot from the literature showed a different response; likely attributable to enhanced cross-linking present in this second resin. This result suggests that the embedded lateral gauges were, at least in part, measuring a physical response behind the shock within the resin. A Hugoniot elastic limit of 0.88 ± 0.04 GPa was derived and found to be of the same order of magnitude as results found elsewhere for similar materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Meziere YJE, Vignjevic R, Lukyanov A (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:325310.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.034 ↗
2. Ryan S, Schfer F, Guyot M, Hiermaier S, Lambert M (2008) Int J Impact Eng 35:175610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.071 ↗
3. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley, New York10.1002/9780470172278 ↗
4. Field JE, Walley SM, Proud WG, Goldrein HT, Siviour CR (2004) Int J Impact Eng 30:72510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.03.005 ↗
5. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Gray GT III, Cooper G (2001) In: Furnish MD, Thadani NN, Horie Y (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter CP620. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, pp 131–134
6. Barker LM, Hollenbach RE (1970) J Appl Phys 41(10):420810.1063/1.1658439 ↗
7. Millett JCF, Bourne NK (2004) J Phys D Appl Phys 37:290110.1088/0022-3727/37/20/018 ↗
8. Hazell PJ, Edwards MR, Longstaff H, Erskine J (2009) Int J Impact Eng 36:14710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.12.009 ↗
9. Bourne NK, Millett JCF (2003) Proc R Soc Lond A 459:56710.1098/rspa.2002.1043 ↗
10. Marsh SP (1980) LASL Shock Hugoniot Data. University of California Press, Ltd, Los Angeles
11. Gerlach R, Siviour CR, Petrinic N, Wiegand J (2008) Polymer 49:272810.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.018 ↗
12. Hazell PJ, Stennett C, Cooper G (2009) Compos A 40:20410.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.002 ↗
13. Munson DE, May RP (1972) J Appl Phys 43(3):96210.1063/1.1661315 ↗
14. Hazell PJ, Stennett C, Cooper G (2008) Polym Compos 29(10):110610.1002/pc.20614 ↗
15. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Barnes NR (2002) J Appl Phys 92(11):659010.1063/1.1506389 ↗
16. Winter RE, Harris EJ (2008) J Phys D Appl Phys 41:03550310.1088/0022-3727/41/3/035503 ↗
17. Winter RE, Owen GD, Harris EJ (2008) J Phys D Appl Phys 41:20200610.1088/0022-3727/41/20/202006 ↗
18. Skordos AA, Karkanas PI, Partridge IK (2000) Meas Sci Technol 11:2510.1088/0957-0233/11/1/304 ↗
19. Aduriz XA, Lupi C, Boyard N, Bailleul J-L, Leduc D, Sobotka V, Lefèvre N, Chapeleau X, Boisrobert C, Delaunay D (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:319610.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.008 ↗
20. HexFlow® RTM 6 180 °C epoxy system for Resin Transfer Moulding monocomponent system: Product Data. Hexcel Composites, Duxford UK: https://doi.org/www.hexcel.com/Products/Downloads/RTM%20Data%20Sheets/
21. Saunders KJ (1988) Organic polymer chemistry, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London10.1007/978-94-009-1195-6 ↗
22. Safety Data Sheet RTM6. Hexcel Composites (Duxford UK)
23. Bourne NK (2003) Meas Sci Technol 14:27310.1088/0957-0233/14/3/304 ↗
24. Rosenburg Z, Partom Y (1985) J Appl Phys 58(8):307210.1063/1.335833 ↗
25. Rosenburg Z, Brar NS (1995) J Appl Phys 77(4):1143
26. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Rosenberg Z (1996) J Phys D Appl Phys 29:246610.1088/0022-3727/29/9/035 ↗
27. Appleby-Thomas GJ, Hazell PJ, Stennett C, Cooper G, Helaar K, Diederen AM (2009) J Appl Phys 106:064916-1-064916-9
28. Porter D, Gould PJ (2006) J Phys IV France 134:37310.1051/jp4:2006134057 ↗
29. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Dandekar DP (2004) J Appl Phys 96(7):372710.1063/1.1787617 ↗