journal article·2008-09

Joining of tungsten carbide to nickel by direct diffusion bonding and using a Cu–Zn alloy

José Lemus-Ruiz, Leonel Ceja-Cárdenas, J. A. Verduzco, Osvaldo Flores

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

The objective of this work was to study various aspects of liquid and solid state diffusion bonding of cylindrical samples of WC (with 6% Co) and commercially pure nickel (99.5%) produced by direct bonding and brazing using a 25 μm thick 70Cu 30Zn (wt%) alloy as joining element. Joining experiments were carried out on WC/Ni and WC/Cu Zn/Ni combinations at temperature of 980 °C using 1, 15, 25 and 35 min holding times in argon (Ar). The results show that it is possible to create a successful joint at temperature and times used. Joining occurred by the formation of a diffusion zone. The joining interface is feasible because it presents a homogeneous interface with no several interfacial cracking and porosity. In both combinations, it can be observed a diffusion of cobalt decreasing in the direction of the metal, as well as, the diffusion of nickel decreasing in the direction of the ceramic.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Fernie JA, Sturgeon AJ (1992) Bonding & joining. Joining Ceramic Materials, USA
2. Nicholas MG (1998) Joining processes: introduction to brazing and diffusion bonding
3. Tomsia AP (1993) J Phys IV 3:1317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:1993720310.1051/jp4:19937203 ↗
4. Tinsley ND, Huddleston J, Lacey MR (1998) Mater Manuf Process 13:49110.1080/10426919808935271 ↗
5. Janickovic D, Sebo P, Duhaj P, Svec P (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 304–306:569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01536-710.1016/S0921-5093(00)01536-7 ↗
6. Carim AH, Mohr CH (1997) Mater Lett 33:195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(97)00098-010.1016/S0167-577X(97)00098-0 ↗
7. Wang L, Aldinger F (2002) Mater Lett 54:93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(01)00536-510.1016/S0167-577X(01)00536-5 ↗
8. Heikimheimo E, Isomaki I, Kodentsov AA, Van Loo FJJ (1997) J Eur Ceram Soc 17:25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(96)00082-910.1016/S0955-2219(96)00082-9 ↗
9. Locatelli MR, Dalgleish BJ, Nakashima K, Tomsia AP, Glaeser AM (1997) Ceram Int 23:313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-8842(96)00024-710.1016/S0272-8842(96)00024-7 ↗
10. Marks RA, Chapman DR, Danielson DT, Glaeser AM (2000) Acta Mater 48:4425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00229-910.1016/S1359-6454(00)00229-9 ↗
11. Lemus J, Drew RAL (2003) Mater Sci Eng A352–306:16910.1016/S0921-5093(02)00892-4 ↗
12. Jadoon AK, Ralph B, Hornsby PR (2004) J Mater Proc Tech 152:257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.005 ↗
13. Suganuma K (1993) Mater Res Soc Sym Proc 314:5110.1557/PROC-314-51 ↗
14. Anderson RM (1989) Adv Mater Proc 3:31
15. Richerson DW (1992) Modern ceramic engineering, 2nd edn. Marcel Decker, New York
16. Osendi MI, De Pablos A, Miranzo P (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 308:53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)02027-X10.1016/S0921-5093(00)02027-X ↗
17. Lemus-Ruiz J, León-Patiño CA, Drew RAL (2006) Metall Mater Trans A 37A:69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-0153-410.1007/s11661-006-0153-4 ↗