Joining of tungsten carbide to nickel by direct diffusion bonding and using a Cu–Zn alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this work was to study various aspects of liquid and solid state diffusion bonding of cylindrical samples of WC (with 6% Co) and commercially pure nickel (99.5%) produced by direct bonding and brazing using a 25 μm thick 70Cu 30Zn (wt%) alloy as joining element. Joining experiments were carried out on WC/Ni and WC/Cu Zn/Ni combinations at temperature of 980 °C using 1, 15, 25 and 35 min holding times in argon (Ar). The results show that it is possible to create a successful joint at temperature and times used. Joining occurred by the formation of a diffusion zone. The joining interface is feasible because it presents a homogeneous interface with no several interfacial cracking and porosity. In both combinations, it can be observed a diffusion of cobalt decreasing in the direction of the metal, as well as, the diffusion of nickel decreasing in the direction of the ceramic.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Fernie JA, Sturgeon AJ (1992) Bonding & joining. Joining Ceramic Materials, USA
2. Nicholas MG (1998) Joining processes: introduction to brazing and diffusion bonding
3. Tomsia AP (1993) J Phys IV 3:1317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:1993720310.1051/jp4:19937203 ↗
4. Tinsley ND, Huddleston J, Lacey MR (1998) Mater Manuf Process 13:49110.1080/10426919808935271 ↗
5. Janickovic D, Sebo P, Duhaj P, Svec P (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 304–306:569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01536-710.1016/S0921-5093(00)01536-7 ↗
6. Carim AH, Mohr CH (1997) Mater Lett 33:195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(97)00098-010.1016/S0167-577X(97)00098-0 ↗
7. Wang L, Aldinger F (2002) Mater Lett 54:93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(01)00536-510.1016/S0167-577X(01)00536-5 ↗
8. Heikimheimo E, Isomaki I, Kodentsov AA, Van Loo FJJ (1997) J Eur Ceram Soc 17:25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(96)00082-910.1016/S0955-2219(96)00082-9 ↗
9. Locatelli MR, Dalgleish BJ, Nakashima K, Tomsia AP, Glaeser AM (1997) Ceram Int 23:313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-8842(96)00024-710.1016/S0272-8842(96)00024-7 ↗
10. Marks RA, Chapman DR, Danielson DT, Glaeser AM (2000) Acta Mater 48:4425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00229-910.1016/S1359-6454(00)00229-9 ↗
11. Lemus J, Drew RAL (2003) Mater Sci Eng A352–306:16910.1016/S0921-5093(02)00892-4 ↗
12. Jadoon AK, Ralph B, Hornsby PR (2004) J Mater Proc Tech 152:257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.005 ↗
13. Suganuma K (1993) Mater Res Soc Sym Proc 314:5110.1557/PROC-314-51 ↗
14. Anderson RM (1989) Adv Mater Proc 3:31
15. Richerson DW (1992) Modern ceramic engineering, 2nd edn. Marcel Decker, New York
16. Osendi MI, De Pablos A, Miranzo P (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 308:53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)02027-X10.1016/S0921-5093(00)02027-X ↗
17. Lemus-Ruiz J, León-Patiño CA, Drew RAL (2006) Metall Mater Trans A 37A:69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-0153-410.1007/s11661-006-0153-4 ↗