journal article·2008-03

Effect of montmorillonite modification on mechanical properties of vulcanized natural rubber composites

Jana Hrachová, Peter Komadel, Ivan Chodák

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Natural rubber-clay composites were prepared by direct polymer melt intercalation. Ca-montmorillonite Jelsový Potok (JP; Slovakia) and Na-montmorillonite Kunipia-F (KU; Japan) were ion exchanged with octadecyltrimethylammonium (ODTMA) bromide and were used as aluminosilicate fillers. Silica Ultrasil VN3 was used in amount of 15 phr as conventional filler. The effect of clay or organoclay loading from 1 up to 10 phr on the mechanical properties was evaluated from the tensile tests (stress at break, strain at break and modulus M100). Organic modification resulted in an increase of toluene uptake degree for both fillers. While an addition of unmodified KU had no effect on tensile strength and deformation at break, a reinforcing effect was observed for the mixture containing 10 phr of unmodified JP. Both ODTMA modified fillers (KU and JP) exhibited substantial increase in tensile strength and deformation at break; JP proved to be more effective compared to KU also if modified with ODTMA. The highest stress at break and strain at break values for natural rubber composites were obtained with 15 phr of SiO2 and 10 phr of montmorillonite; however, the effect of exchangeable cation was minor.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Alexandre M, Dubois P (2000) Mater Sci Eng R28:110.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7 ↗
2. Mohammad A, Simon GP (2006) In: Mai Y-W, Yu ZZ (eds) Polymer nanocomposites, chap 12. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 29710.1533/9781845691127.1.297 ↗
3. Sadhu S, Bhowmick AK (2005) J Mater Sci 40:163310.1007/s10853-005-0663-2 ↗
4. Kader MA, Kim K, Lee Y-S, Nah C (2006) J Mater Sci 41:734110.1007/s10853-006-0792-2 ↗
5. Cataldo F (2007) Macromol Symp 247:6710.1002/masy.200750109 ↗
6. Zhang L, Wang Y, Wang Y, Sui Y, Yu D (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 78:187310.1002/1097-4628(20001209)78:11<1873::AID-APP40>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
7. Arroyo M, Lopez-Machado MA, Herrero B (2003) Polymer 44:244710.1016/S0032-3861(03)00090-9 ↗
8. Nah C, Ryu HJ, Han SH, Rhee JM, Lee M-H (2001) Polym Int 50:126510.1002/pi.809 ↗
9. Ray SS, Okamoto M (2003) Prog Polym Sci 28:153910.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 ↗
10. Karger-Kocsis J, Wu CM (2004) Polym Eng Sci 44:108310.1002/pen.20101 ↗
11. Cataldo F (2005) Macromol Symp 228:9110.1002/masy.200551008 ↗
12. López-Manchado MA, Herrero B, Arroyo M (2003) Polym Int 52:107010.1002/pi.1161 ↗
13. Varghese S, Karger-Kocsis J (2003) Polymer 44:492110.1016/S0032-3861(03)00480-4 ↗
14. Zheng H, Zhang Y, Peng Z, Zhang Y (2004) Polym Test 23:21710.1016/S0142-9418(03)00097-7 ↗
15. Gatos KG, Thomann R, Karger-Kocsis J (2004) Polym Int 53:119110.1002/pi.1556 ↗
16. Sadhu S, Bhowmick AK (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 92:69810.1002/app.13673 ↗
17. Wang S, Long C, Wang X, Li Q, Qi Z (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 69:155710.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980822)69:8<1557::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
18. Wang Y, Zhang L, Tang C, Yu D (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 78:187910.1002/1097-4628(20001209)78:11<1879::AID-APP50>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
19. Wu YP, Jia Q-X, Yu D-S, Zhang L-Q (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 89:385510.1002/app.12568 ↗
20. Hrachová J, Chodák I, Komadel P (2007) Chem Papers (submitted)