Fabrication of SiC particles-reinforced magnesium matrix composite by ultrasonic vibration
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnesium matrix composites reinforced with two volume fractions (1 and 3%) of SiC particles (1 μm) were successfully fabricated by ultrasonic vibration. Compared with as-cast AZ91 alloy, with the addition of the SiC particles grain size of matrix decreased, while most of the phase Mg17Al12 varied from coarse plates to lamellar precipitates in the SiCp/AZ91 composites. With increasing volume fraction of the SiC particles, grains of matrix in the SiCp/AZ91 composites were gradually refined. The SiC particles were located mainly at grain boundaries in both 1 vol% SiCp/AZ91 composite and 3 vol% SiCp/AZ91 composite. SiC particles inside the particle clusters may be still separated by magnesium. The study of the interface between the SiC particle and the alloy matrix suggested that SiC particles bonded well with the alloy matrix without interfacial reaction. The ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation to fracture of the SiCp/AZ91 composites were simultaneously improved compared with that of the as-cast AZ91 alloy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang XJ, Wu K, Huang WX, Zhang HF, Zheng MY, Peng DL (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:225310.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.022 ↗
2. Ye HZ, Liu XY (2005) J Alloys Compd 402:16210.1016/j.jallcom.2005.04.175 ↗
3. Jiang QC, Li XL, Wang HY (2003) Scr Mater 48:71310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00551-1 ↗
4. Bochenek A, Braszczynska KN (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 290:12210.1016/S0921-5093(00)00926-6 ↗
5. Cai Y, Tan MJ, Shen GJ, Su HQ (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 282:23210.1016/S0921-5093(99)00707-8 ↗
6. Chen TJ, Ma Y, Lv WB, Li YD, Hao Y (2010) J Mater Sci 45:6732. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4767-y10.1007/s10853-010-4767-y ↗
7. Saravanan RA, Surappa MK (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 276:10810.1016/S0921-5093(99)00498-0 ↗
8. Wang XJ, Hu XS, Wu K, Zheng MY, Zheng L, Zhai QJ (2009) J Mater Sci 44:2759. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3360-810.1007/s10853-009-3360-8 ↗
9. Luo A (1995) Mater Trans A 26:244510.1007/BF02671259 ↗
10. Ferkel H, Mordike BL (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 298:19310.1016/S0921-5093(00)01283-1 ↗
11. Zheng MY, Wu K, Yao CK (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 318:5010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01338-7 ↗
12. Lan J, Yang Y, Li X (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 386:28410.1016/j.msea.2004.07.024 ↗
13. Li X, Yang Y, Cheng XD (2004) J Mater Sci 39:3211. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000025862.23609.6f10.1023/B:JMSC.0000025862.23609.6f ↗
14. Cao G, Konishi H, Li X (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 486:35710.1016/j.msea.2007.09.054 ↗
15. Choi H, Alba-Baena N, Nimityongskul S, Jones M, Wood T, Sahoo M, Lakes R, Kou S, Li X (2011) J Mater Sci 46:2991. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5176-y10.1007/s10853-010-5176-y ↗
16. Suslick KS (1999) Annu Rev Mater Sci 29:29510.1146/annurev.matsci.29.1.295 ↗
17. Liu X, Osawa Y, Takamori S, Mukai T (2008) Mater Lett 62:287210.1016/j.matlet.2008.01.063 ↗
18. Liu X, Osawa Y, Takamori S, Mukai T (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 487:12010.1016/j.msea.2007.09.071 ↗
19. Khosro Aghayani M, Niroumand B (2011) J Alloys Compd 509:11410.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.139 ↗
20. Ye HZ, Liu XY (2004) J Mater Sci 39:6153. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000043583.47148.3110.1023/B:JMSC.0000043583.47148.31 ↗