journal article·2011-08

Effect of solvents on the dynamic viscoelastic behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate) film prepared by solvent casting

Niranjan Patra, Marco Salerno, Alberto Diaspro, Athanassia Athanassiou

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Poly(methyl methacrylate) films were prepared by dissolving the polymer in chloroform, toluene and tetrahydrofuran, with identical concentrations of 200 mg/mL, and drop casting the solutions on Teflon surface at room temperature. The thermal, thermomechanical and structural properties have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical analyzer, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, respectively. The dynamic mechanical behavior of the films has been measured over a temperature range of 30–150 °C, using sinusoidal stress with a frequency of 2 Hz. The samples prepared from tetrahydrofuran showed the highest storage modulus, indicating a higher polymer chain entanglement in that solvent, whereas the samples prepared from chloroform showed the lowest storage modulus. The samples prepared from chloroform, which showed the weakest mechanical properties, also showed the lowest glass transition temperature, which is evidence of the plasticization and solvent retention mechanism of chloroform. The spectroscopic analysis confirmed the solvent-polymer interactions giving rise to the above mentioned effects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Haller I, Hatzakis M, Srinivasan R (1968) IBM J Res Develop 12:25110.1147/rd.123.0251 ↗
2. Burke B, Herlihy T Jr, Spisak A, Williams K (2008) Nanotechnology 19:21530110.1088/0957-4484/19/21/215301 ↗
3. Chou SY, Krauss PR, Renstrom PJ (1995) Appl Phys Lett 67:311410.1063/1.114851 ↗
4. D’Amore F, Lanata M, Pietralunga S, Gallazzi M, Zerbi G (2004) Opt Mater 24:66110.1016/S0925-3467(03)00181-2 ↗
5. Sciancalepore C, Cassano T, Curri M, Mecerreyes D, Valentini A, Agostiano A, Tommasi R, Striccoli M (2008) Nanotechnology 19:20570510.1088/0957-4484/19/20/205705 ↗
6. Bistac S, Schultz J (1997) Int J Adhesion Adhesives 17:19710.1016/S0143-7496(97)00001-8 ↗
7. Feng X, Weiwen F, Rongshi C (2006) Chem China 1:45
8. Hong PD, Huang HT, Chou CM (2000) Polym Int 49:40710.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(200004)49:4<407::AID-PI394>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
9. Bubb DM, Papantonakis M, Collins B, Brookes E, Wood J, Gurudas U (2007) Chem Phys Lett 448:19410.1016/j.cplett.2007.10.002 ↗
10. Kaczmarek H, Chaberska H (2008) Polym Testing 27:73610.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.05.005 ↗
11. Patra N, Barone AC, Salerno M (2011) Adv Polym Technol 30:1210.1002/adv.20203 ↗
12. Hansen C (2007) Hansen solubility parameters: a user’s handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL10.1201/9781420006834 ↗
13. Vien DL, Colthup NB, Fateley WG, Grasselli JG (1991) Infrared and Raman characteristic frequencies of organic molecules. Academic Press, New York
14. Brandrup J, Immergut EH (1999) Polymer handbook, 4th edn. Wiley Interscience, New York