Effect of superalloy substrate composition on the performance of a thermal barrier coating system
Source abstract
Abstract
An investigation was carried out to determine the performance of a thermal barrier coating system consisting of (ZrO2-8% Y2O3)/(Pt) on two single-crystal Ni-base superalloys. Coating/alloy behavior was studied with reference to: (i) initial microstructural features, (ii) oxidation properties, (iii) thermal stability characteristics, and (iv) failure mechanism. All thermal exposure tests were carried out at 1150°C in still air with a 24-h cycling period to room temperature. Failure of the coating system was indicated by macroscopic spallation of the ceramic top coat. Scanning electron microscopy combined with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy as well as X-ray diffraction were used to characterize the microstructure. Decohesion between the thermally grown oxide and bond coat was found to be the mode of failure of the coating system for both alloys. This was correlated with the formation of Ti-rich and/or Ti+Ta-rich oxide particles near the oxide-bond coat interface degrading the adherence of the thermally grown oxide. However, the thickening rate of the oxide had very little or no effect on the relative coating performance. It was concluded that the coating performance is critically dependent on alloy substrate composition particularly the concentration of elements, which could have adverse effects on oxidation resistance such as Ti.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. H. M. Tawancy, N. Sridhar, N. M. Abbasand D. S. Rickerby, J. Mater. Sci. 33(1998) 681.10.1023/A:1004333627312 ↗
2. U. Dietl, Surf. and Coat. Tech. 68/69(1994) 17.10.1016/0257-8972(94)90131-7 ↗
3. J. H. Sun, E. Chang, C. H. Chaoand M. Cheng, Oxid. Met. 40(5/6) (1993) 465.10.1007/BF00666387 ↗
4. S. M. Meier, D. M. Nissley, K. D. Shefflerand T. A. Cruse, Trans. ASME 114(1992) 258.
5. W. Lih, E. Chang, B. C. Wuand C. H. Chao, Oxid. Met. 36(3/4) (1991) 221.
6. R. M. Miller, J. Eng. for Gas Turbines and Power 111(1989) 301.10.1115/1.3240251 ↗
7. H. M. Tawancy, N. M. Abbasand T. N. Rhysjones, Surf. and Coat. Tech. 54/55(1992) 1.
8. H. M. Tawancy, N. Sridhar, N. M. Abbasand D. S. Rickerby, J. Mater. Sci. 35(2000) 3615.10.1023/A:1004825932601 ↗
9. U. Schulz, M. Menzebach, C. Leyensand Y. Q. Young, Surf. and Coat. Tech. 146/147(2001) 117.10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01481-5 ↗
10. H. M. Tawancy, N. Sridhar, N. M. Abbasand D. S. Rickerby, J. Mater. Sci. 35(2000) 3615.10.1023/A:1004825932601 ↗
11. J. L. Smialekand G. H. Meier, in “Superalloys II” edited by C. T. Sims, N. S. Stoloff and W. C. Hagel (Wilely-Interscience, New York, New York, 1987) p. 293.