journal article·2009-05

Wear characteristics of spray formed Al-alloys and their composites

V. C. Srivastava, G. B. Rudrakshi, V. Uhlenwinkel, S. N. Ojha

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

In the present investigation, different Al based alloys such as Al–Si–Pb, Al–Si, Al–Si–Fe and 2014Al + SiC composites have been produced by spray forming process. The microstructural features of monolithic alloys and composite materials have been examined and their wear characteristics have been evaluated at different loads and sliding velocities. The microstructural features invariably showed a significant refinement of the primary phases and also modification of secondary phases in Al-alloys. The Pb particles in Al–Si–Pb alloy were observed to be uniformly distributed in the matrix phase besides decorating the grain boundaries. The spray formed composites showed uniform distribution of SiC particles in the matrix. It was observed that wear resistance of Al–Si alloy increases with increase in Pb content; however, there is not much improvement after addition of Pb more than 20%. The coefficient of friction reduced to 0.2 for the alloy containing 20%Pb. A sliding velocity of 1 ms−1 was observed to be optimum for high wear resistance of these materials. Alloying elements such as Fe and Cu in Al–Si alloy lead to improved wear resistance compared to that of the base alloy. The addition of SiC in 2014Al alloy gave rise to considerable improvement in wear resistance but primarily in the low pressure regime. The wear rate seemed to decrease with increase in sliding velocity. The wear response of the materials has been discussed in light of their microstructural features and topographical observation of worn surfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Roberts EW (1990) Tribol Int 23:95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-679X(90)90042-N10.1016/0301-679X(90)90042-N ↗
2. Mohan S, Agarwala V, Ray S (1992) Wear 157:9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(92)90184-A10.1016/0043-1648(92)90184-A ↗
3. Alkemper J, Ratke L (1994) Z Metallk 85:365
4. Rudrakshi GB, Srivastava VC, Ojha SN (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 457:100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.02410.1016/j.msea.2006.12.024 ↗
5. Lloyd DJ (1994) Int Mater Rev 39:110.1179/imr.1994.39.1.1 ↗
6. Ratke L, Diefenbach S (1995) Mater Sci Eng Rep 15:1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-796X(95)00180-810.1016/0927-796X(95)00180-8 ↗
7. Al-Rubaie KS, Goldenstein H, De Mello JDB (1999) Wear 225–229:163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00009-510.1016/S0043-1648(99)00009-5 ↗
8. Bindumadhavan PN, Chia TK, Chandrasekaran M, Wah MK, Lam NK, Prabhakar O (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 315:21710.1016/S0921-5093(00)01989-4 ↗
9. Muratoglu M, Aksoy M (2006) J Mater Proc Tech 174:272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.01.01010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.01.010 ↗
10. Tenekedjiev N, Gruzleski JE (1990) Cast Metab 3:9610.1080/09534962.1990.11819026 ↗
11. Jorstad JL (1971) AFS Trans 79:85
12. Midling OT, Grong O (1995) Key Eng Mater 104–107:32910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.104-107.329 ↗
13. Srivastava VC, Mandal RK, Ojha SN (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 383:14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.03110.1016/j.msea.2004.02.031 ↗
14. Wu Y, Lavernia EJ (1992) Metab Mater Trans A 23:2923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0265177010.1007/BF02651770 ↗
15. Wu Y, Cassada WA, Lavernia EJ (1995) Metab Mater Trans A 26:1235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0267061810.1007/BF02670618 ↗
16. Chiang CH, Tsao CYA (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 396:263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.01.01710.1016/j.msea.2005.01.017 ↗
17. Srivastava VC, Schneider A, Uhlenwinkel V, Bauckhage K (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 412:1910.1016/j.msea.2005.09.002 ↗
18. Tham LM, Gupta M, Cheng L (1999) J Mater Process Technol 89–90:128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00002-310.1016/S0924-0136(99)00002-3 ↗
19. Zambon A, Badan B, Maddalena A (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 375–377:645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.22910.1016/j.msea.2003.10.229 ↗
20. Lavernia EJ, Wu Y (1996) Spray atomization and deposition. Wiley, West Sussex, England
21. Grant PS (1995) Prog Mater Sci 39:49710.1016/0079-6425(95)00004-6 ↗
22. Srivastava VC, Schneider A, Uhlenwinkel V, Ojha SN, Bauckhage K (2005) Trans Ind Inst Met 58:91
23. Ojha KV, Tomar A, Singh D, Kaushal GC (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 487:59110.1016/j.msea.2007.10.032 ↗
24. Lim SC, Gupta M, Leng YF, Lavernia EJ (1997) J Mater Proc Tech 63:86510.1016/S0924-0136(96)02740-9 ↗
25. Elmadagli M, Perry T, Alpas AT (2007) Wear 262:7910.1016/j.wear.2006.03.043 ↗
26. Srivastava VC, Ojha SN (2004) Mater Sci Tech 20:163210.1179/026708304X11305 ↗
27. Gouthama, Rudrakshi GB, Ojha SN (2007) J Mater Proc Tech 189:22410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.01.026 ↗
28. Chen Z, Teng J, Chen G, Fu D, Yan H (2007) Wear 262:36210.1016/j.wear.2006.05.019 ↗
29. Lim SC, Gupta M, Ren L, Kwok JKM (1999) J Mater Proc Tech 89–90:59110.1016/S0924-0136(99)00067-9 ↗
30. Schneider A, Srivastava VC, Uhlenwinkel V, Bauckhage K (2004) Z Metallk 95:76310.3139/146.018019 ↗
31. Srivastava VC, Mandal RK, Ojha SN, Venkateswarlu K (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 471:3810.1016/j.msea.2007.04.109 ↗
32. Srivastava VC, Ghoshal P, Ojha SN (2002) Mater Lett 56:79710.1016/S0167-577X(02)00616-X ↗
33. Hirst W, Lancaster JK (1956) J Appl Phys 27:105710.1063/1.1722541 ↗
34. Davis FA, Eyre TS (1994) Tribol Int 27:17110.1016/0301-679X(94)90042-6 ↗
35. Antoniou A, Boraland DW (1987) Mater Sci Eng A 93:5710.1016/0025-5416(87)90412-5 ↗
36. Amateau MF, Lee DS, Conway JC (1996) In: Wood JV (ed) Proc 3rd Int Conf ‘Spray forming’ (ICSF-3). Cardiff, UK, p 321
37. Gui M, Kang SB, Lee JM (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 293:14610.1016/S0921-5093(00)01052-2 ↗
38. Alpas AT, Zhang J (1999) Metall Mater Trans A 25:96910.1007/BF02652272 ↗