journal article·2008-05

The effects of growth and storage conditions on dislocations in hemp fibres

Lisbeth G. Thygesen, Mohammad R. Asgharipour

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Natural fibres contain structural distortions known as dislocations. Dislocations have been found to negatively affect the properties of plant fibre-based materials. The present study concerned the effect of the growth conditions of hemp plants (Cannabis sativa L.) on the amount of dislocations within the fibres retrieved from the stems. Dislocations were found in fibres from plants grown under absolutely wind-free conditions, but both windy and dry conditions introduced significantly more dislocations. Furthermore their maximum size was larger and they were situated closer together within the fibres. The average ultimate tensile stress of fibre bundles from the windy and the dry growth regimes was lower than that of fibre bundles from plants grown under wind-free conditions. In a separate study it was found that plant stems that were dried after harvest and remoistened prior to analysis contained a lower amount of dislocations than plants analysed directly after harvest.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Bamboo properties and applications · Tree Root and Stability Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Davies GC, Bruce DM (1998) Tex Res J 68:62310.1177/004051759806800901 ↗
2. Hughes M, Sèbe G, Hague J, Hill C, Spear M, Mott L (2000) Compos Interface 7:13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/15685540030018355110.1163/156855400300183551 ↗
3. Bos HL, Van Den Oever MJA, Peters OCJJ (2002) J Mater Sci 37:1683. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101492562125210.1023/A:1014925621252 ↗
4. Lamy B, Pomel C (2002) J Mater Sci Lett 21:1211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101652461986710.1023/A:1016524619867 ↗
5. Baley C (2004) J Mater Sci 39:331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007768.63055.ae10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007768.63055.ae ↗
6. Thygesen LG, Eder M, Burgert I (2007) J Mater Sci 42:558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1113-510.1007/s10853-006-1113-5 ↗
7. Nyholm K, Ander P, Bardage S, Daniel G (2001) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 4:374
8. Terziev N, Daniel G, Marklund A (2005) Holzforschung 59:163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2005.02510.1515/HF.2005.025 ↗
9. Ander P, Marklund A (2003) WURC report no. 4. ISBN 91-576-6647-4, available from P. Ander, Department of Wood Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7008, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
10. Koch G, Bauch J, Dünisch O, Seehann G, Schmitt U (1996) Holz Roh Werkst 54:243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107005017510.1007/s001070050175 ↗
11. Burgert I, Keckes J, Frühmann K, Fratzl P, Tschegg SE (2002) Plant Biol 4:9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-2043010.1055/s-2002-20430 ↗
12. Hoffmeyer P (1990) Failure of wood as influenced by moisture and duration of load. PhD thesis, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, p 123
13. Thygesen LG, Ander P (2005) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 20:64. doi:https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2005-20-01-p064-07110.3183/npprj-2005-20-01-p064-071 ↗