Sintering temperature, microstructure and resistivity of polycrystalline Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 as SOFC's electrolyte
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, near-completely soft-agglomerated Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 powders have been prepared. The pellets were formed and sintered at various sintering conditions of temperature and time. It was found that the sintering conditions have significant effects on the pellet resistivity. By the measurements with the DC four-probe method, it was found that the overall resistivity of the polycrystalline Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 material sintered at 1500°C increases linearly with the reciprocal of the average grain size. The AC impedance spectroscopy has been used to distinguish the grain resistivity and the apparent grain boundary resistivity. The “brick layer” microstructural model has been used to provide an estimate of the apparent grain boundary resistivity and to relate the electrical properties to the microstructural parameters. By lowering the sintering temperature to 1100–1200°C, the true grain boundary resistivity was nearly two orders lower than that sintered at 1500°C, and thus the overall resistivity decreases to about 31 ohm-cm at 700°C measurement. This makes the Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 material capable of working as SOFC's electrolyte at temperatures lower than 700°C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. H. Yahiro, T. Ohuchi, K. Eguchi and H. Arai, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 1036.10.1007/BF01154008 ↗
2. H. Arai, T. Kunisaki and Y. Shimizu, Solid State Ionics 20 (1986) 241.10.1016/0167-2738(86)90041-X ↗
3. C. Hatchwell, N. M. Sammes and I. W. M. Brown, ibid. 126 (1999) 201.10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00232-5 ↗
4. S. Dikmen, P. Shuk and M. Greenblatt, ibid. 126 (1999) 89.10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00146-0 ↗
5. D. Y. Wang, D. S. Park, J. Griffith and A. S. Nowick, ibid. 2 (1981) 95.10.1016/0167-2738(81)90005-9 ↗
6. S. J. Hong, K. Mehta and A. V. Virkar, J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (1998) 638.10.1149/1.1838316 ↗
7. I. Riess, D. Braunstein and D. S. Taunhauser, ibid. 64 (1981) 479.
8. A. V. Virkar, G. R. Miller and R. S. Gordon, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 61 (1978) 250.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1978.tb09292.x ↗
9. R. W. Powers and S. P. Mitoff, J. Electrochem. Soc. 122 (1975) 226.10.1149/1.2134183 ↗
10. G. B. Jung, T. J. Huang, M. H. Huang and C. L. Chang, J. Mater. Sci. 36 (2001) 5839.10.1023/A:1012964307388 ↗
11. J. E. Bauerle, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 30 (1969) 2657.10.1016/0022-3697(69)90039-0 ↗
12. P. L. Chen and I. W. Chen, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 69 (1996) 1793.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07997.x ↗
13. J. Frenkel, “Kinetic Theory of Liquids” (Oxford University Press, New York, 1946).
14. A. I. Ioffe, M. V. Inozemstsev, A. S. Lipilin, M. V. Perfilev and S. V. Karpachov, Phys. Status Solidi 30 (1975) 87.10.1002/pssa.2210300109 ↗
15. T. van Dijk and A. J. Burggraaf, ibid. 63 (1981) 229.10.1002/pssa.2210630131 ↗
16. M. H. Huang, Ph.D Thesis, Imperial College, London (1991).
17. M. Kleitz, L. Desseemond and M. C. Steil, Solid State Ionics 75 (1999) 107.10.1016/0167-2738(94)00143-G ↗
18. N. Bonanos, B. C. H. Steel, E. P. Butler, W. B. Johnson, W. L. Worrell and D. D. MacDonald, in “Impedance Spectroscopy,” edited by J. R. Macdonald (Wiley, New York, 1987) p. 191.
19. X. Guo, Solid State Ionics. 81 (1995) 235.10.1016/0167-2738(95)00180-E ↗
20. W. D. Kingery, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 57 (1974) 74.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb10818.x ↗
21. K. Lehovec, J. Chem. Phys. 21 (1953) 1123.10.1063/1.1699148 ↗
22. C. Tian and S. W. Chan, Solid State Ionics 134 (2000) 89.10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00717-7 ↗