journal article·2001-05

Effect of nucleating agents and cooling rate on the microstructure and properties of a rotational moulding grade of polypropylene

M. C. Cramez, M. J. Oliveira, R. J. Crawford

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 36· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Rotational moulding consists of coating the inside surface of a metal mould with a layer of plastic by rotating the mould, firstly in an oven and then in a cooling bay to induce solidification to the desired part shape. As the rotational speeds are slow (typically about 10 rev/min), the resulting hollow articles are practically stress free. The primary material used for rotationally moulded parts is polyethylene but there is an increasing interest in using polypropylene to provide stiffer, higher temperature products. Unfortunately the slow cooling combined with the slow crystallisation rate of polypropylene results in brittle mouldings with coarse spherulites. Since the inner surface of the plastic is in contact with air during moulding, degradation is also likely to occur. In order to improve the mechanical properties of the rotationally moulded polypropylene, α and β nucleating additives were added. The effect of using faster cooling rates was also studied. It was found that heterogeneous nucleation, both of β and α spherulites, did not improve the ductility of the samples. However, when fast cooling was used, the impact strength of the polypropylene improved markedly, independent of the presence of nucleating additives. In the rotationally moulded polypropylene parts, the fast cooling could only be applied to the outer surface of the mould, which led to asymmetric cooling. This resulted in severe warpage, and uneven morphology. This problem should be overcome by using fast cooling on both the inside and outside surfaces of the plastic.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. R. J. Crawford, “Rotational Moulding of Plastics,” 2nd edition (John Wiley andSons Inc., 1996).
2. M. J. Oliveira, M. C. Cramez and R. J. Crawford, J. Mater. Science 31(1996) 2227.10.1007/BF01152932 ↗
3. Idem., ibid. 33 (1998) 4869.10.1023/A:1004485825823 ↗
4. B. Lotz, J.C. Wittmann and A. J. Lovinger, Polymer 37 (1996) 4979.10.1016/0032-3861(96)00370-9 ↗
5. F. J. Padden Jr. and H. D. Keith, J. Appl. Phys. 30 (1959) 1479.10.1063/1.1734985 ↗
6. S. C. Tjong, J. S. Shen and R. K.Y. Li, Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 (1996) 100.10.1002/pen.10390 ↗
7. P. Jacoby, B. H. Bersted, W. J. Kisseland C. E. Smith, J. Polym. Sci.: Part B: Polym. Physics 24 (1986) 461.10.1002/polb.1986.090240301 ↗
8. P. Zipper, P.M. Abuja, A. JÁnosi, E. Wrentschur, W. Geymayer, E. Ingolic and W. Friesenbichler, Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 (1996) 467.10.1002/pen.10433 ↗
9. J. Karger-Kocsis, J. Varga and G. W. Ehrenstein, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 64 (1997) 2057.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970613)64:11<2057::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
10. K. Friedrich, Friedrich, Polymer Sci. 66 (1979) 299.
11. K. Friedrich, Kunststoffe 69 (1979)11, p. 786, engl. transl. p. 17.
12. J. L. Way, J. R. Atkinson and J. Nutting, J. Mater. Science 9 (1974) 293.10.1007/BF00550954 ↗
13. M. J. Oliveira, M. C. Cramez, R. J. Crawford and P. J. Nugent,in Proceedings of Europhysics Conference on Macromolecular Physics, Prague (Czech. Rep.) July 1995.
14. R.J. Crawford and P. J. Nugent, Plast. Rubb. and Comp. Proc. and Appl. 17 (1992) 31.
15. N.J. Mills, “Plastics, Microstructure, Properties and Applications” (Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd., London, 1986).
16. F. J. Padden Jr. and H. D. Keith, J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 4013.10.1063/1.1707968 ↗
17. V. A. GonzÁlez, G. VelÁsquez and J. L. SÁnchez, Polym. Deg. Stab. 60 (1998) 33.10.1016/S0141-3910(96)00233-9 ↗
18. R. Greco and F. Coppola, Plast. and Rubb. Proc. and Appl. 6(1986) 35.
19. K. Ple ßmann, G. Menges, M. Cremer, W. Fenske, W. Feser, C. Netze, H. Offergeld, G. PÖtsch and H. Stabrey, Kunststoffe 80 (1990) 2, p. 200, engl. transl. p. 26.
20. O. Mabrouk and P. J. Philips, J. Polym. Sci: Part B: Polymer Physics 33 (1995) 1313.10.1002/polb.1995.090330901 ↗
21. M. Avella, R. Dell'erba, E. Martuscelli and G. Ragosta,Polymer 34 (1993) 2951.10.1016/0032-3861(93)90620-P ↗
22. M. Al-Ghazawi and R. P. Sheldon, J. Pol. Sci.: Polym.Letters Ed. 21 (1983) 347.
23. H. N. Beck, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 11 (1967) 673.10.1002/app.1967.070110505 ↗
24. S. Vleeshouwers, Polymer 38 (1997) 3213.10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00894-4 ↗
25. S. Z. D. Cheng, J. J. Janimakand J. Rodriguez, in “Polypropylene Structure, Blends and Composites: Structure and Morphology,” edited by J. Karger-Kocsis, Vol. 1, Chap. 2 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995) p. 31.10.1007/978-94-011-0567-5_2 ↗
26. S. Bawiskarand J. L. White, Polym. Eng. Sci. 34 (1994) 815.10.1002/pen.760341006 ↗
27. S.-H. Liu and C.-Y. Ho, Adv.Polym. Tech. 18 (1999) 201.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199923)18:3<201::AID-ADV1>3.0.CO;2-N ↗