journal article·2008-12

Multiscale modeling of intergranular fracture in aluminum: constitutive relation for interface debonding

V. Yamakov, E. Saether, E. H. Glaessgen

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 23-24
Publisher page

Abstract

Intergranular fracture is a dominant mode of failure in ultrafine grained materials. In the present study, the atomistic mechanisms of grain-boundary debonding during intergranular fracture in aluminum are modeled using a coupled molecular dynamics—finite element simulation. Using a statistical mechanics approach, a cohesive-zone law in the form of a traction–displacement constitutive relationship, characterizing the load transfer across the plane of a growing edge crack, is extracted from atomistic simulations and then recast in a form suitable for inclusion within a continuum finite element model. The cohesive-zone law derived by the presented technique is free of finite size effects and is statistically representative for describing the interfacial debonding of a grain boundary (GB) interface examined at atomic length scales. By incorporating the cohesive-zone law in cohesive-zone finite elements, the debonding of a GB interface can be simulated in a coupled continuum–atomistic model, in which a crack starts in the continuum environment, smoothly penetrates the continuum–atomistic interface, and continues its propagation in the atomistic environment. This study is a step toward relating atomistically derived decohesion laws to macroscopic predictions of fracture and constructing multiscale models for nanocrystalline and ultrafine grained materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Yamakov V, Phillips DR, Saether E, Glaessgen EH (2007) In: Bozzolo GH, Noebe RD, Abel P (eds) Applied computational materials modeling: theory, experiment, and simulation. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-23117-4
2. Glaessgen E, Saether E, Phillips D, Yamakov V (2006) 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference and exhibit, Newport, RI, May 1–4, 2006
3. Dugdale DS (1960) J Mech Phys Solids 8:100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
4. Barenblatt GI (1962) Adv Appl Mech 7:5510.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
5. Yamakov V, Saether E, Phillips DR, Glaessgen EH (2006) J Mech Phys Solids 54:1899. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2006.03.00410.1016/j.jmps.2006.03.004 ↗
6. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1996) Int J Solids Struct 33:3297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00261-810.1016/0020-7683(95)00261-8 ↗
7. Beer G (1985) Int J Numer Methods Eng 21:585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162021040210.1002/nme.1620210402 ↗
8. Gall K, Horstemeyer MF, Van Schilfgaarde M, Baskes MI (2000) J Mech Phys Solids 48:2183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00086-110.1016/S0022-5096(99)00086-1 ↗
9. Komanduri R, Chandrasekaran N, Raff LM (2001) Int J Mech Sci 43:2237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00043-110.1016/S0020-7403(01)00043-1 ↗
10. Spearot D, Jacob KI, Mcdowell DL (2004) Mech Mater 36:82510.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.002 ↗
11. Raynolds JE, Smith JR, Zhao G-L, Srolovitz DJ (1996) Phys Rev B 53:13883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1388310.1103/PhysRevB.53.13883 ↗
12. Mishin Y, Farkas D, Mehl MJ, Papaconstantopoulos DA (1999) Phys Rev B 59:3393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.339310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
13. Saether E, Yamakov V, Glaessgen E (2007) 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference
14. Saether E, Yamakov V, Glaessgen E (submitted) Int J Numer Meth Eng
15. Cleri F (2001) Phys Rev B 65:014107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.01410710.1103/PhysRevB.65.014107 ↗
16. Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) J Appl Phys 52:7182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.32869310.1063/1.328693 ↗
17. Nose S (1984) J Chem Phys 81:511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.44733410.1063/1.447334 ↗
18. Yamakov V, Saether E, Phillips DR, Glaessgen EH (2007) J Mater Sci 42:1466. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1176-310.1007/s10853-006-1176-3 ↗
19. Yamakov V, Saether E, Phillips DR, Glaessgen EH (2005) Phys Rev Lett 95:015502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.01550210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.015502 ↗
20. Murakami Y (ed) (1988) Stress intensity factors handbook, vol 1. Pergamon Press, New York
21. Klimontovich YL (1995) Statistical theory of open systems, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands10.1007/978-94-011-0175-2 ↗