journal article·2011-05Open access

Characterization of fracture toughness (G c) of PVC and PES foams

Elio E. Saenz, Leif A. Carlsson, Anette Karlsson

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 9

Abstract

The fracture behavior of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethersulfone (PES) foams has been examined using the single-edge notch bend and the double cantilever beam (DCB) tests. PVC foam densities ranging from 45 to 100 kg/m3 and PES foam densities ranging from 60 to 130 kg/m3 were examined. The PVC foams failed in a linear elastic brittle manner, whereas the PES foams displayed much more ductility and substantially larger toughness at a comparable foam density. The cell wall thickness of the PES foams was almost twice the thickness of the PVC foams which may have contributed to the high fracture toughness here defined as critical energy release rate (Gc). The PES foam, further displayed low initiation toughness, due to the sharp artificial crack tip and large toughness corresponding to propagation from a natural crack. The results show that the ductile PES foams have toughness close to its solid counterpart whereas the toughness of the PVC foams falls substantially below its solid counterpart.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Zenkert D (1997) Handbook of sandwich construction. Engineering Materials Advisory Services Ltd, London, London
2. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1988) Cellular solids structure and properties, 1st edn. Pergamon Press, Cambridge
3. Maiti S, Ashby M, Gibson L (1984) Scripta Metall 18:21310.1016/0036-9748(84)90510-6 ↗
4. Zenkert D, Bäcklund J (1989) Compos Sci Technol 34(3):22510.1016/0266-3538(89)90030-4 ↗
5. Viana GM, Carlsson LA (2002) J Sandw Struct Mater 4(2):9910.1177/1099636202004002227 ↗
6. Shivakumar KN, Smith SA (2004) J Compos Mater 38(8):65510.1177/0021998304042392 ↗
7. DIAB products-Divinycell (2004) DIAB Group. http://www.diabgroup.com/americas/u_products/u_prods_2.html Accessed 2009
8. Ultrason 1010 PES: Product Information (2004) BASF. http://worldaccount.basf.com/wa/EU/Catalog/ePlastics/info/BASF/product/ultrason_e_1010 Accessed 2009
9. Torlon Polyamide-imide Design Guide (2009) Solvay Advanced Polymers. http://www.solvayadvancedpolymers.com/static/wma/pdf/9/9/7/Torlon_Design_Guide.pdf . Accessed 2009
10. ASTM D3576-04 Standard test method for cell size of rigid cellular plastics
11. ASTM D1622-03 Standard test method for apparent density of rigid cellular plastics
12. ASTM D5045-99 Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials
13. Zenkert D, Shipsha A, Burman M (2006) J Sandw Struct Mater 8(6):51710.1177/1099636206065886 ↗
14. ASTM D5528-01 Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites
15. Prasad S, Carlsson LA (1994) Eng Fract Mech 47(6):81310.1016/0013-7944(94)90061-2 ↗
16. Li X, Carlsson LA (1999) J Sandw Struct Mater 1(1):6010.1177/109963629900100104 ↗
17. Shivakumar KN, Chen H, Smith SA (2005) J Sandw Struct Mater 7(1):7710.1177/1099636205047085 ↗
18. Anderson T (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
19. Saenz E, Carlsson LA, Acha BA, Karlsson AM (2010) In: 9th international conference on sandwich structures, Pasadena