The influence of starch swelling on the material properties of cooked potatoes
Source abstract
Abstract
Cooked potatoes have a wide range of food applications, but the mechanism by which softening occurs on heating is not clearly understood. Heating potato parenchyma tissue results in two independent, concurrent events; weakening of the binding between cells and swelling of intra-cellular starch. Potato plants containing starches with a range of high amylose contents and reduced swelling properties were available. This provided the opportunity to separate cooking effects of inter-cellular pectin from swelling of intra-cellular starch. Their individual contribution to the separation of cells and the softening of cooked potato tissue was established by studying the influence of heat on the material properties of a range of starch-modified potatoes. For all potato lines studied, the strength of the heated tissue decreased markedly following 30 minutes at 80degreesC or 5 minutes at 100degreesC. Microscopy of the line in which there was minimal starch swelling, indicated that the cells of the cooked tissue principally contained fluid, in contrast to the controls in which the cells were filled with swollen starch on cooking. Since all the lines followed the same trend with regard to the thermal weakening of the tissue, we conclude that weakening of potato tissue on cooking is primarily controlled by thermal degradation of the middle lamella. (C) 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Food composition and properties · Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. N. C. CARPITA and D. M. GIBEAUT, The Plant Journal 3 (1993) 1.10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.00999.x ↗
2. S. HILLER and G. JERONIMIDIS, J. Mater. Sci. 31 (1996) 2779.10.1007/BF00355984 ↗
3. L. C. GREVE, K. A. SHACKEL, H. AHMADI, R. N. MCARDLE, J. R. GOHLKE and J. M. LABAVITCH, 0J. Agric. Food Chem. 42 (1994) 2896.10.1021/jf00048a047 ↗
4. A. ANDERSON, V. GEKAS, I. LIND, F. OLIVEIRA and R. OSTE, CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 34 (1994) 229.10.1080/10408399409527662 ↗
5. K. W. WALDRON, A. C. SMITH, A. J. PARR, A. NG and M. L. PARKER, Trends in Food Sci. & Technol. 8 (1997) 213.10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01052-2 ↗
6. J. T. VAN MARLE, A. C. M. CLERKX and A. BOEKESTEIN, Food Structure 11 (1992) 209.
7. R. M. REEVE, Food Research 19 (1954) 323.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1954.tb17460.x ↗
8. S. BINNER, W. G. JARDINE, C. M. C. G. RENARD and M. C. JARVIS, J. Sci. Food Agric. 80 (2000) 216.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(20000115)80:2<216::AID-JSFA507>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
9. M. C. JARVIS, E. MACKENZIE and H. J. DUNCAN,Potato Research 35 (1992) 93.10.1007/BF02357730 ↗
10. D. S. WARREN and J. S. WOODMAN, J. Sci. Food Agric. 25 (1974) 129.10.1002/jsfa.2740250204 ↗
11. Y. S. KIM, D. P. WIESENBORN, P. H. ORR and L. A. GRANT, J. Food Sci. 60 (1995) 1060.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb06292.x ↗
12. G. P. SCHWALL, R. SAFFORD, R. J. WESTCOTT, R. JEFFCOAT, A. TAYAL, Y-C. SHI, M. J. GIDLEY and S. A. JOBLING, Nature Biotechnology 18 (2000) 551.10.1038/75427 ↗
13. D. FRENCH, in “Starch: Chemistry & Technology,” 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1984) p. 184.
14. R. SAFFORD et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 35 (1998) 155.10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00249-X ↗
15. S. A. JOBLING et al., The Plant Journal 18 (1999) 163.10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00441.x ↗
16. E. MAGEL, Starch/Starke 43 (1991) 384.10.1002/star.19910431003 ↗
17. A. EDWARDS, D. C. FULTON, C. M. HYLTON, S. A. JOBLING, M. J. GIDLEY, U. ROESSNER, C. MARTIN and A. M. SMITH, The Plant Journal 17 (1999) 251.10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00371.x ↗
18. M. DEBET, S. A. JOBLING and M. J. GIDLEY, unpublished data.
19. T. SAJJAANANTAKUL, J. P. VAN BUREN and D. L. DOWNING, J. Food Sci. 54 (1989) 1272.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb05972.x ↗
20. M. J. GIDLEY and A. P. ORMEROD (1998) EP 0850570.