journal article·2001-06

Establishing a protocol for measurements of fractal dimensions in brittle materials

T. J. Hill, A. Della Bona, J. J. Mecholsky

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 36· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Many techniques have been used to measure the fractal dimension of brittle fracture surfaces. The purpose of this study was to create a protocol for obtaining the fractal dimension using a simplified optical technique for comparison to reported procedures. Four classes of ceramic materials were used in this study: baria silicate (a glass-ceramic), silicon nitride (a fine grain polycrystalline ceramic), zinc selenide (a large grain polycrystalline ceramic), and silicon (a single crystal ceramic). Contours were produced in perpendicular and parallel planes to the fracture surface using three techniques: slit-island (parallel), profile technique (perpendicular), and crack indentation technique (perpendicular). These contours were then analyzed using a method first introduced by Richardson. The slit-island technique produced statistically greater fractal dimensional increments, ranging from 0.08 to 0.28 for all the materials, than either the profile technique (0.01 to 0.03) or the indentation technique (0.02–0.05). This difference is due in part to the fact that many brittle fracture surfaces are self-affine objects and not self-similar objects. A list of recommendations for a protocol and sources of error for this technique are presented in the appendices.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Theoretical and Computational Physics · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. J. P. Bouchaud, E. Bouchaud, G. Lapasset and J. Planes, Phys. Rev. Ltrs 71(4) (1993) 2240.10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2240 ↗
2. B. B. Mandelbrot, D. E. Passoja and Paulley, Nature 308 (1984) 721.10.1038/308721a0 ↗
3. J. C. Russ, “Fractal Surfaces” (Plenum Press, New York, 1994).10.1007/978-1-4899-2578-7 ↗
4. J. J. Mecholsky, D. E. Passoja and K. S. Feinberg-Ringel, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 72 (1989) 60.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb05954.x ↗
5. K. C. Clarke, Computers and Geosciences 122(5) (1986) 713.10.1016/0098-3004(86)90047-6 ↗
6. K. C. Clarke and D. M. Schweiser, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 18(1) (1991) 37.10.1559/152304091783805617 ↗
7. D. R. Denley, J. Vac. Sci. Techn. A8(101) (1990) 603.10.1116/1.576351 ↗
8. D. J. Alexander, “Quantitative Methods in Fractography, ASTM STP 1085” (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1990) p. 39.
9. M. Tanaka, J. Mater. Sci. 31 (1996) 749.10.1007/BF00367895 ↗
10. K. Banerji and E. E. Underwood, Advances Fracture Research (UK Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984) p. 1371.
11. E. E. Underwood and K. Banerji, Mater. Sci. Eng. 80 (1982) 1.10.1016/0025-5416(86)90297-1 ↗
12. L. F. Richardson, “General Systems Yearbook” Vol. 6, p. 139.
13. G. Pezzotti, K. Noda, Y. Okamoto and T. Nishida, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 3080.10.1007/BF00354714 ↗
14. G. Pezzotti, M. Sakai, Y. Okamoto and T. Nishida, Mater. Sci. Eng. A197 (1995) 109.10.1016/0921-5093(94)09758-5 ↗
15. J. Wasen, E. Heier and T. Hansson, Scripta Materialia 38(6) (1998) 953.10.1016/S1359-6462(97)00566-6 ↗
16. C. W. Lung, “Fractals in Physics” (Amsterdam, North Holland, 1985) p. 189.
17. C. W. Lung and Z. Q. Mu, Phys. Rev. B38 (1988) 11781.10.1103/PhysRevB.38.11781 ↗
18. Y. Fahmy, J. C. Russ and C. C. Koch, J. Mater. Sci. 6(9) (1991) 1856.
19. J. J. Mecholsky, Jr. and J. R. Plaia, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 146 (1992) 249.10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80498-3 ↗
20. J. J. Mecholsky, in “Fractography of Glasses and Ceramics III, ” Ceramic Transactions: Vol. 64, edited by J. R. Varner, V. D. Frechette and G. D. Quinn (1996) p. 385.
21. Z. Chen, J. J. Mecholsky, T. Joseph and C. L. Beatty, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 6317.10.1023/A:1018657731971 ↗
22. J. C. Hsiung and Y. T. Chou, J. Mater. Sci. 33 (1998) 2949.10.1023/A:1004302629826 ↗
23. C. S. Pande, L. E. Richards, N. Louat, B. D. Dempsey and A. J. Schwoeble, Acta Metall. 35(7) (1987) 1633.10.1016/0001-6160(87)90110-6 ↗
24. C. S. Pande, L.E. Richards and S. Smith, J. Mater. Sci. Let. 6 (1987) 295.10.1007/BF01729330 ↗
25. K. K. Ray and G. Mandal, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 40(3) (1992) 462.
26. S. W. Freiman, J. J. Mecholsky, R. W. Rice and J. C. Wurst, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 58(9–10) (1975) 406.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1975.tb19009.x ↗
27. Y. L. Tsai and J. J. Mecholsky, J. Mater. Res. 6(6) (1991) 1248.10.1557/JMR.1991.1248 ↗
28. T. J. Hill, J. J. Mecholsky and K. J. Anusavice, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 83(3) (2000) 545.10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01232.x ↗
29. A. Della Bona, T. J. Hill and J. J. Mecholsky, Jr., J. Mater. Sci. 36 (2001) 2645.10.1023/A:1017948409986 ↗
30. L. V. Meisel, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24 (1991) 942.10.1088/0022-3727/24/6/020 ↗
31. Q. Y. Long, L. Suqin and C. W. Lung, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24 (1991) 602.10.1088/0022-3727/24/4/011 ↗
32. Z. Chen, private communication, Auburn University (1997).