Study of composite joint strength with carbon nanotube reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to strengthen the interface of a composite scarf joint, this study investigated the benefits of using locally applied carbon nanotubes to reinforce a carbon fiber composite scarf joint. The effect of carbon nanotubes on enhancing the fracture toughness and interface strength was investigated by performing Mode I and Mode II fracture tests with and without carbon nanotubes applied locally at the joint interface. Furthermore, the effects of seawater absorption and different carbon nanotube concentration values on Mode II fracture were investigated. Finally, a partial application of carbon nanotubes only near the crack tip area was considered. During the study, the image correlation technique was used to examine the fracture mechanisms altered by the introduction of carbon nanotubes. The experimental study showed that an optimal amount of carbon nanotubes could increase the fracture toughness of the composite joint interface significantly, especially for Mode II, including a physical change in the fracture mechanism.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Mouritz AP, Gellert E, Burchill P, Challis K (2001) Compos Struct 53:2110.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6 ↗
2. Jones B (2006) Introduction to navy joints design. NSWC Carderock Division
3. Ganesh VK, Choo TS (2002) J Compos Mater 36:175710.1177/0021998302036014172 ↗
4. William D, Callister Jr (2007) Materials science and engineering: an introduction, 7th edn. Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York
5. Thostenson ET, Ren Z, Chou T (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61:189910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X ↗
6. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Kopke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2004) Compos Sci Technol 64(15):236310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002 ↗
7. Xia Z, Curtin WA, Sheldon BW (2004) J Eng Mater Technol 126(3):23810.1115/1.1751179 ↗
8. Veedu VP, Cao A, Li X, Ma K, Soldano C, Kar S, Ajayan PM, Ghasemi-Nejhad MN (2006) Nat Mater 5:45710.1038/nmat1650 ↗
9. Cadek M, Coleman JN, Ran KP, Nicolose V, Bister G, Fonseca A, Nagy JB, Szostzk K, Beguin F, Blau WJ (2004) Nano Lett 4(2):35310.1021/nl035009o ↗
10. Wong M, Paramsothy M, Xu XJ, Ren Y, Li S, Liao K (2003) Polymer 44:775710.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.011 ↗
11. Wong M, Paramsothy M, Xu XJ, Ren Y, Li S, Liao K (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61(13):189910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X ↗
12. Mylvaganam K, Zhang LC (2004) J Phys Chem B 108:521710.1021/jp037619i ↗
13. Schadler LS, Giannaris SC, Ajayan PM (1998) Appl Phys Lett 73(26):384210.1063/1.122911 ↗
14. Qian D, Dickey EC, Andrews R, Rantell T (2000) Appl Phys Lett 76(20):286810.1063/1.126500 ↗
15. Liao K, Li S (2001) Appl Phys Lett 79(25):422510.1063/1.1428116 ↗
16. Kwon YW, Slaff R, Bartlett S, Greene T (2008) J Mater Sci 43:6695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2689-810.1007/s10853-008-2689-8 ↗
17. ASTM Standard D 5528-01, Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites, Mar 2002
18. Todo M, Nakamura T, Takahashi K (2000) J Compos Mater 34:63010.1177/002199830003400801 ↗
19. ASTM Standard D 1141-98, Standard practice for the preparation of substitute ocean water, Aug 2008