Interlaminar fracture characterization for plain weave fabric composites
Source abstract
Abstract
For the analysis of laminated composite plates under transverse loading and drilling of composites, all the elastic, strength and fracture properties of the composite plates are essential. Interlaminar critical strain energy release rate properties in mode I, mode II, mixed mode I/II and mode III have been evaluated for two types of plain weave fabric E-glass/epoxy laminates. The double cantilever beam test and the end notch flexure test have been used for mode I and mode II loading. The mixed mode bending test and split cantilever beam test have been used for mixed mode I/II and mode III loading. It is observed that the plain weave fabric composite with lesser strand width has higher interlaminar fracture properties compared to the plain weave fabric composite with more strand width. Further, crack length versus crack growth resistance plots have been presented for mode III loading. In general, it is observed that total fracture resistance is significantly higher than the critical strain energy release rate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Engineering Applied Research · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. J. M. WHITNEY, I. M. DANIEL and R. B. PIPES, in “Experimental Mechanics of Fiber Reinforced Compoiste Materials” (The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Brookfield Center, Connecticut, 1984) p. 233.
2. S. L. DONALDSON, Composites Science and Technology 32 (1988) 225.10.1016/0266-3538(88)90022-X ↗
3. S. L. DONALDSON and S. MALL, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 8 (1989) 91.10.1177/073168448900800106 ↗
4. J. R. REEDER and J. H. CREWS, Jr., AIAA Journal 28 (1990) 1270.10.2514/3.25204 ↗
5. S. L. DONALDSON, S. MALL and C. LINGG, Journal of Composites Technology and Research 13 (1991) 41.10.1520/CTR10073J ↗
6. P. ROBINSON and D. Q. SONG, Composites Science and Technology 52 (1994) 217.10.1016/0266-3538(94)90207-0 ↗
7. M. L. BENZEGGAGH and M. KENANE, ibid. 56 (1996) 439.10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
8. J. LI and T. K. O'BRIEN, Journal of Composites Technology and Research 18 (1996) 96.10.1520/CTR10520J ↗
9. W. C. LIAO and C. T. SUN, Composites Science and Technology 56 (1996) 489.10.1016/0266-3538(96)00009-7 ↗
10. N. ALIF, L. A. CARLSSON and L. BOOGH, Composites B 29B (1998) 603.10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00014-6 ↗
11. K. N. SHIVA KUMAR, J. H. CREWS, Jr. and V. S. AVVA, Journal of Composite Materials 32 (1998) 804.10.1177/002199839803200901 ↗
12. A. P. MOURITZ, C. BAINI and I. HERSZBERG, CompositesA 30A (1999) 859.10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00197-3 ↗
13. N. K. NAIK, N. BULLI RAJU, P. DURGA PRASAD, SAILENDRA MEDURI, SK. N. M. AZAD, K. SATYANARAYANA REDDY and P. A. OGDE, in Proceeding of ICEM-IX(Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc., Bethal, Connecticut, 2000) p. 754.
14. E. E. GDOUTS, K. PILAKOUTAS and C. A. RODOPOULOS, in “Failure Analysis of Industrial Composite Materials” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000) p. 147.
15. J. W. GILLESPIE, Jr. and L. A. CARLSSON, in “Delaware Composites Design Encyclopedia,” Vol.6 (Techromic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, 1990) p. 113.
16. N. K. NAIK, Y. CHANDRA SEKHER and M. SAILENDRA, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 19 (2000) 912.10.1106/X80M-4UEF-CPPK-M15E ↗