journal article·2014-03

Thermo-mechanical properties of innovative microcrystalline cellulose filled composites for art protection and restoration

Annalisa Cataldi, Andrea Dorigato, Flavio Deflorian, Alessandro Pegoretti

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 49· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) powder was selected as a natural reinforcement for a commercial acrylic adhesive widely used in the field of art protection and restoration (Paraloid B72). In particular, various amounts (from 5 to 30 wt%) of MCC were melt compounded with Paraloid B72 to prepare new thermoplastic polymer composites for the cultural heritage conservation field. Scanning electron microscopy showed that MCC flakes are uniformly dispersed within the matrix at all the tested compositions, without preferential orientation. Thermogravimetric analysis evidenced an increase of thermal stability due to the MCC introduction, even at low filler amounts, while DSC measurements demonstrated that the glass transition temperature progressively increases with the MCC content. Interestingly, DMTA analysis revealed a stabilizing effect on the material produced by microcellulose addition, with an increase of the storage modulus and a decrease of the thermal expansion coefficient, in proportion to the filler loading. Moreover, MCC addition determined an increase of the elastic modulus and creep stability with respect to the neat resin, and an enhancement of fracture toughness (K IC).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Building materials and conservation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Mills JS, White R (1994) The organic chemistry of museum objects, 2nd edn. Butterworth, Oxford
2. Van Oosten T, Shashoua Y, Waentig F (2002) Plastics in arts: history, technology, preservation. Kölner Beiträge zur Restaurierung und Konservierung von Kunst- und Kulturgut Band 15. Siegl, Munich
3. Robson M (1992) Early advances in the use of acrylic resins for the conservation of antiquities. In: Allen NS, Edge M, Horie CV (eds) Polymers in conservation. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, p 184
4. Taylor TH (1984) In situ repair of architectural glass, adhesives and consolidants. International Institute for Conservation, London
5. Amoroso GG, Fassina V (1973) Stone decay and conservation. Elsevier, Amsterdam
6. Chiantore O, Lazzari M (2001) Photo-oxidative stability of paraloid acrylic protective polymers. Polymer 42(1):17–2710.1016/S0032-3861(00)00327-X ↗
7. Lazzari M, Chiantore O (2000) Thermal-ageing of paraloid acrylic protective polymers. Polymer 41(17):6447–645510.1016/S0032-3861(99)00877-0 ↗
8. Sale D (2011) Yellowing and appearance of conservation adhesives for poly(methyl methacrylate): a reappraisal of 20-year-old samples and test methods. In: Adhesives and consolidants for conservation, Ottawa
9. Chapman S, Mason D (2003) Literature review: the use of Paraloid B-72 as a surface consolidant for stained glass. J Am Inst Conserv 42(11):381–39210.1179/019713603806112813 ↗
10. Down JL, MacDonald MA, Tétreault J, Williams RS (1996) Adhesive testing at the Canadian Conservation Institute: an evaluation of selected poly(vinyl acetate) and acrylic adhesives. Stud Conserv 41(1):19–4410.2307/1506550 ↗
11. Hansen EF, Derrick MR, Schilling MR, Garcia R (1991) The effects of solution application on some mechanical and physical properties of thermoplastic amorphous polymers used in conservation: poly(vinyl acetate)s. J Am Inst Conserv 30(2):203–21310.2307/3179532 ↗
12. Keskkula H, Paul DR (1986) Miscibility of polyethyloxazoline with thermoplastic polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 31(5):1189–119710.1002/app.1986.070310504 ↗
13. Spoljaric S, Genovese A, Shanks RA (2009) Polypropylene–microcrystalline cellulose composites with enhanced compatibility and properties. Composites A 40(6–7):791–79910.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.011 ↗
14. Shanks RA, Hodzic A, Ridderhof D (2006) Composites of poly(lactic acid) with flax fibers modified by interstital polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 99(23):5–13
15. Gaonkar SM, Kulkarni PR (1989) Microcrystalline cellulose from coconut shells. Acta Polym 40(4):292–29410.1002/actp.1989.010400419 ↗
16. Padmadisastra Y, Gonda I (1989) Preliminary studies of the development of a direct compression cellulose excipient from bagasse. J Pharm Sci 78(6):508–51410.1002/jps.2600780619 ↗
17. Thummanukitcharoen P, Limpanart S, Srikulkit K (2011) Preparation of organosilane treated microcrystalline cellulose (SIMCC) and the polypropylene/SIMCC composite. In: 18th International conference on composite materials, Jeju Island
18. Chauhan YP, Sapkal RS, Sapkal VS, Zamre GS (2009) Microcrystalline cellulose from cotton rags (waste from garment and hosiery industries). Int J Chem Sci 7(2):681–688
19. Das K, Ray D, Bandyopadhyay NR, Sengupta S (2010) Study of the properties of microcrystalline cellulose particles from different renewable resources by XRD, FTIR, nanoindentation, TGA and SEM. J Polym Environ 18(3):355–36310.1007/s10924-010-0167-2 ↗
20. Qui W, Endo T, Hirotsu T (2006) Interfacial interaction, morphology and tensile properties of a composite of highly crystalline cellulose and maleated polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci 102(38):30–41
21. Dorigato A, D’Amato M, Pegoretti A (2012) Thermo-mechanical properties of high density polyethylene—fumed silica nanocomposites: effect of filler surface area and treatment. J Polym Res 19:9889–989910.1007/s10965-012-9889-2 ↗
22. Dorigato A, Pegoretti A, Quaresimin M (2011) Thermo-mechanical characterization of epoxy/clay nanocomposites as matrices for carbon/nanoclay/epoxy laminates. Mater Sci Eng A 528:6324–633310.1016/j.msea.2011.04.042 ↗
23. Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 24:221–27410.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5 ↗
24. Kalaitzidou K, Fukushima H, Drzal LT (2007) Mechanical properties and morphological characterization of exfoliated graphite–polypropylene nanocomposites. Composites A 38:1675–168210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.003 ↗
25. Dorigato A, Morandi S, Pegoretti A (2012) Effect of nanoclay addition on the fiber/matrix adhesion in epoxy/glass composites. J Compos Mater 46:1439–145110.1177/0021998311420311 ↗
26. Kiziltas A, Gardner DJ, Han Y, Yang HS (2011) Dynamic mechanical behavior and thermal properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)-filled nylon 6 composites. Thermochim Acta 519(1–2):38–4310.1016/j.tca.2011.02.026 ↗
27. Mathew AP, Oksman K, Sain MM (2005) Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites from poly lactic acid (PLA) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). J Appl Polym Sci 97:2014–202510.1002/app.21779 ↗
28. Lavengood RE, Goettler LA (1971) Stiffness of non-aligned fiber reinforced composites. US Government R&D Reports, vol AD886372. National Technical Information Service, Springfield10.21236/AD0886372 ↗
29. Halpin JC (1969) Stiffness and expansion estimates for oriented short fibre composites. J Compos Mater 3:732–73510.1177/002199836900300419 ↗
30. Hancock BC, Clas S-D, Christensen K (2000) Micro-scale measurement of the mechanical properties of compressed pharmaceutical powders. 1: the elasticity and fracture behavior of microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm 209(1–2):27–3510.1016/S0378-5173(00)00541-X ↗
31. Eichhorn SJ, Young RJ (2001) The young’s modulus of a microcrystalline cellulose. Cellulose 8:197–20710.1023/A:1013181804540 ↗