journal article·2008-08

Fatigue crack growth of filament wound GRP pipes with a surface crack under cyclic internal pressure

Ahmet Samanci, Ahmet Avci, Necmettin Tarakcioglu, Ömer Sinan Şahin

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, fatigue damage behavior of (±753) filament wound composite pipes with a surface crack under alternating internal pressure was investigated. The specimens were tested at room temperature and exposed to open ended fatigue tests in which the pipe can be deformed freely in the axial direction. The tests were carried out in accordance with the ASTM D-2992 standard. The alternating internal pressure was generated by conventional hydraulic oil. The low cycle tests were performed with 0.42 Hz frequency and R = 0.05 stress ratio. Glass reinforced polymer pipes (GRP) are made of E-glass/epoxy and have (±753) configuration. Surface cracks were machined in the axial direction of the pipes which have depth-to-thickness ratios a/t = 0.25–0.38–0.50 and depth to length ratio of a/c = 0.2. Tests were performed at three different loads of 50%, 40%, and 30% of ultimate hoop stress strength of unnotched pipes. The failure behavior of GRP pipes during the test was observed and fatigue test results were presented by means of (S–N) curves and delamination damage zone area-cycle (A–N) curves.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Philippidis TP, Anastasios P (2001) J Fatigue 24:813–82310.1016/S0142-1123(02)00003-8 ↗
2. Shan Y, Liao K (2002) J Fatigue 24:847–859
3. Vanpaepegem W, Degrieck J (2001) Compos Part A-Appl S 32:1433–144110.1016/S1359-835X(01)00042-2 ↗
4. Ellyin F, Martens M (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61:491–50210.1016/S0266-3538(00)00215-3 ↗
5. Martin RH, Murri GB (1990) Comp Mater Test Des 11:251–270
6. Richard F, Perreux D (2000) Reliab Eng Syst Safe 68:53–5910.1016/S0951-8320(00)00002-8 ↗
7. Tong J (2002) Int J Fatigue 24:291–29710.1016/S0142-1123(01)00084-6 ↗
8. Kaynak C, Mat O (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61:1833–1840. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00084-710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00084-7 ↗
9. Rousseau J, Perreux D, Verdiere N (1999) Compos Sci Technol 59:1439–144910.1016/S0266-3538(98)00184-5 ↗
10. Ferry L, Perreux D, Rousseau J, Richard F (1998) Compos Part B-Eng 29:715–72310.1016/S1359-8368(98)00030-4 ↗
11. Perreux D, Suri C (1997) Compos Sci Technol 57:1403–141310.1016/S0266-3538(97)00076-6 ↗
12. Joseph E, Perreux D (1994) Compos Sci Technol 52:469–48010.1016/0266-3538(94)90029-9 ↗
13. Perreux D, Joseph D (1997) Compos Sci Technol 57:353–36410.1016/S0266-3538(96)00155-8 ↗
14. Tarakçıoğlu N, Akdemir A, Avcı A (2001) Compos Part B-Eng 32:131–13810.1016/S1359-8368(00)00037-8 ↗
15. Tarakcioglu N, Gemi L, Yapici A (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:703–70810.1016/j.compscitech.2004.10.002 ↗
16. Tarakcioglu N, Samanci A, Arikan H, Akdemir A (2007) Compos Struct 80:207–21110.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.015 ↗
17. Avci A, Şahin ÖS, Tarakçioğlu N (2007) Compos Part A-Appl S 38:1192–119910.1016/j.compositesa.2006.04.011 ↗