journal article·2001-06

Fracture variability and R-curve behavior in yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics

D. Casellas, J. Alcalá, L. Llanes, M. Anglada

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 36· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

An assessment of fracture origins is conducted in yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics containing different grain sizes. As the microstructure coarsens due to the application of heat treatments, fracture origins change from single pores to transformed regions at the free surface which are induced by the applied stress. The observation of an increasing size of failure origins with microstructural coarsening lies as the underlying reason for the finding that specimens containing coarser microstructures and a more pronounced R-curve behavior do not fail at larger stresses. A fracture model is used to link the strength variability of a fully tetragonal zirconia containing a small grain size to its pore size distribution. The increased transformability of zirconia ceramics with coarser tetragonal grains is evaluated by means of quantitative phase analysis, characterizations of fracture surface morphology, and R-curve assessments. It is confirmed that tetragonal grains of up to 4 μm may not necessarily undergo a spontaneous t–m transformation upon cooling from sintering.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. B. Lawn, “Fracture of Brittle Solids,” 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1993).10.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
2. R. W. Rice, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 1673.10.1023/A:1018511613779 ↗
3. D. B. Marshall, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 69 (1986) 173.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb07402.x ↗
4. M. V. Swain and L. R. F. Rose, ibid. 69 (1986) 511.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb04785.x ↗
5. L. Ruiz and M. J. Readey, ibid. 79 (1996) 2331.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08980.x ↗
6. F. L. Cumbrera, F. SÁnchez-Bajo, R. FernÁndez and L. Llanes, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18 (1998) 2247.10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00112-5 ↗
7. D. R. Clarke and F. Adar, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 65 (1982) 284.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10445.x ↗
8. M. S. Kaliszewski, G. Behrens, A. H. Heuer, M. C. Shaw, D. B. Marshall, G. W. Dransmann, R. W. Steinbrech, A. Pajares, F. Guiberteau, F. L. Cumbrera and A. Domin-Guez, ibid. 77 (1994) 1185.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05391.x ↗
9. R. F. Cook, L. M. Braun and W. R. Cannon, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 2133.10.1007/BF01154691 ↗
10. J. AlcalÁ and M. Anglada, Mater. Sci. Eng. A245 (1998) 267.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00726-0 ↗
11. G. Quinn, J. KÜbler and R. Getting, VAMAS Report # 17, NIST, Gaithersburg MD, USA (1993).
12. R. F. Cook and B. R. Lawn, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 66 (1983) C–200.
13. J. C. Newman and I. S. Raju, Engng. Fract. Mech. 15 (1981) 185.10.1016/0013-7944(81)90116-8 ↗
14. A. G. Evans, “Advances in Ceramics: Science and Technology of Zirconia II,” edited by N. Claussen, M. Rühle and A. H. Heuer (Am. Ceram. Soc., Ohio, USA, 1980) p. 193.
15. R. K. Govila, J. Mater. Sci. 30 (1995) 2656.10.1007/BF00362149 ↗
16. J. AlcalÁ and M. Anglada, Mater. Sci. Eng. A232 (1997) 103.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00106-8 ↗
17. A. Zimmermann, M. Hoffman, B. D. Flinn, R. K. Bordia, T.-J. Chuang, E. R. Fuller and J. RÖdel, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 81 (1998) 2449.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02641.x ↗
18. R. W. Rice, J. Mater. Sci. 19 (1984) 895.10.1007/BF00540460 ↗
19. F. I. Baratta, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 64 (1981) C–3.
20. T. Fett, Int. J. Fract. 67 (1994) R–41.10.1007/BF00019608 ↗
21. R. Danzer and T. Lube, in “Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics 11,” edited by Bradt et al. (Plenum Press, NY, USA, 1996) p. 425.
22. P. Stanley, H. Fessler and A. D. Sivill, Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 22 (1973) 453.
23. Idem., Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. 190 (1976) 589.10.1243/PIME_PROC_1976_190_062_02 ↗